Monday, 22 May 2023

 

Using ‘he/him,’ ‘she/her’ in emails got 2 dorm directors fired at small New York Christian college

By BOBBY CAINA CALVAN yesterday



 

 

NEW YORK (AP) — Shua Wilmot and Raegan Zelaya, two former dorm directors at a small Christian university in western New York, acknowledge their names are unconventional, which explains why they attached gender identities to their work email signatures.

Wilmot uses “he/him.” Zelaya goes by “she/her.”

Their former employer, Houghton University, wanted them to drop the identifiers in line with a new policy for email formats implemented in September. Both refused and were fired.

 

“My name is Shua. It’s an unusual name. And it ends with a vowel, ‘a,’ that is traditionally feminine in many languages,” Wilmot said in a nearly one-hour video he and Zelaya posted on YouTube shortly after they were let go last month. “If you get an email from me and you don’t know who I am, you might not know how to gender me.”

Ongoing culture wars in the U.S. over sexual preferences, gender IDs and transgender rights have engulfed politics, school campuses and many other facets of public and private life. At least 17 Republican-led states have severely restricted gender affirming care. Debates continue to rage in some communities about school curricula mentioning sexual orientation or gender identity. And pickets have sprung up outside public libraries hosting “drag story hours.”

Meanwhile, controversies swirl at campuses with religious affiliations. The recent firings prompted more than 700 Houghton alumni to sign a petition in protest.

In the Northwest, 16 plaintiffs are suing Seattle Pacific University, a Christian liberal arts college, to challenge the school’s employment policy barring people in same-sex relationships from full-time jobs.

In New York City, LGBTQ students are challenging Yeshiva University’s decision to bar their student-run club from campus.

Paul Southwick, director of the Religious Exemption Accountability Project, a 2-year-old advocacy group for LGBTQ students at publicly funded religious colleges and universities, said actions such as these are cause for despair.

 “There’s a backlash against the rise of LGBTQ rights,” he said, and not just with “white evangelical Christianity in the South ... but in places like New York and Oregon that we wouldn’t think would be experiencing this backlash.”

Earlier this year, a federal judge in Oregon dismissed a lawsuit that LGBTQ students filed against the U.S. Department of Education claiming it didn’t protect them against discrimination at religiously affiliated universities receiving federal money.

Houghton University, an 800-student campus 60 miles (96 kilometers) southeast of Buffalo, says it offers a “Christ-centered education in the liberal arts and sciences.”

In a statement emailed to The Associated Press on Saturday, the university said it could not speak publicly about personnel matters, but it “has never terminated an employment relationship based solely on the use of pronouns in staff email signatures.”

The university said it had previously asked employees to remove “anything extraneous,” including Bible quotes, from email signatures.

The university also shared with the AP an email outlining its new policy sent to staff. The memo cautioned employees against using politically divisive and inflammatory speech in communications bearing the Houghton name. It also directed them to use standardized signature styles and forbade the use of pronouns.

Also attached to the statement was a copy of a letter university President Wayne D. Lewis Jr. sent to students.

“I would never ask you to agree with or support every decision I make,” Lewis wrote. “But I do humbly ask that you resist the temptation to reduce Houghton’s decision making to the simple and convenient political narratives of our time.”

Zelaya said she received an email in the fall from administrators saying the school was mandating changes in colors, fonts and other aspects of email to help the school maintain branding consistency.

She complied, she said, but retained her pronouns on her signature, calling it a “standard industry practice” to do so.

In the dismissal letters hand-delivered to Wilmot and Raegan Zelaya, copies of which they shared on social media, the university wrote that the firings were “a result of your refusal to remove pronouns in your email signatures in violation of institutional policy.”

In a video posted on Facebook, Zelaya said she already has another job lined up. In their joint YouTube video, she and Wilmot urged their supporters to push for change in policies, but constructively and with civility.

“As a result of this whole controversy, as a result of having my pronouns in my email signature,” Wilmot said, “it’s given me the opportunity to educate people on this topic.”

 

28 comments:

  1. Galatians 3:28 refers. Those who condemn homosexuality in the name Christ blaspheme his name and betray his sacrificial love.

    ReplyDelete
  2. "Galatians 3:28 refers. Those who condemn homosexuality in the name Christ blaspheme his name and betray his sacrificial love."

    What absolute bollocks!

    GENE

    ReplyDelete
  3. Only ever dismissal - never a reasoned argument - typical of a simpleton with a closed and empty mind. You poor sod.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Crude, ignorant and heartless. What an utter bastard you are.

    ReplyDelete
  5. The only reasoned argument here is 'absolute bollocks'. Read what the Church of England teaches:

    'Homosexual acts are incompatible with the Scriptures.'

    Gene

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. As usual, selective and dishonest quoting to bolster your untenable bigotry. As Cottrell and Welby said in February 2023 “For the first time same-sex couples will be welcomed joyfully and without reservation in our church”. Noted fuckwit Gene Vincent commented “Bollocks”. Gene, you are pissing into the wind as usual.

      Delete
  6. That does not give the green light to homosexual acts.

    Gene

    ReplyDelete
  7. Of course it does, you fuckwitted cockney ponce. Show me where the archbishops say “we welcome same sex couples into our church joyfully - but only if they are celibate”. You can’t because they don’t. This pronouncement obviously rescinds the previous teaching on homosexual sex.

    Just look at that - Gene Vincent once more covered in his own piss.

    Game, set and match to me yet again.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Oh! my God! You really have lost it! Now the C of E has given the okay to sodomy, the most vile, evil and immoral act imaginable!!!

    Well, much as I despise the C of E, it certainly has not done so. The C of E teaching is that homosexual acts are incompatible with the Scriptures.

    Check it out with Lambeth Palace.


    GENE

    ReplyDelete
  9. Gene, repeating a lie doesn’t turn it into the truth. Nor is cherry picking a single statement from a much longer document anything other than blatant dishonesty - and given that it is you, inept and blatant dishonesty. The Archbishops’ February 2023 statement obviously supersedes previous teachings on the subject. Your obsession with sodomy is simply a pathology.

    ReplyDelete
  10. [1] take that last comment down NOW or the Chancellor of the Grantham Diocese will be informed of your libellous claims about Bishop Nick Chamberlain. My family is OFF LIMITS to you, you nasty little creep. And DON'T piss me about with crap about "discussing it" with your sock puppets. ANY TIME IN THE NEXT NINETY MINUTES, OR ELSE.

    ReplyDelete
  11. [2] I get angry because of your hypocrisy - you claim to a Christian, but your relentless nastiness towards homosexuals betrays the love of Christ every time you open your dirty mouth.

    [3] My nephew is a fine man, and he doesn't owe you or anyone an explanation or an apology for his sexuality or how he expresses it.

    [4] As usual, when you run out of arguments, you resort to low minded and cruel attacks on my family, because you know it causes me pain. That is the action of a cruel and malignant sadist. So

    [5] take that last comment down NOW or the Chancellor of the Grantham Diocese will be informed of your libellous claims about Bishop Nick Chamberlain by email tomorrow morning. My family is OFF LIMITS to you, you nasty little creep. And DON'T piss me about with crap about "discussing it" with your sock puppets. ANY TIME IN THE NEXT NINETY MINUTES, OR ELSE.

    ReplyDelete
  12. ON SECOND THOUGHTS, DON'T BOTHER.

    I am going to email The Revd His Honour Judge Mark Bishop now at lincoln.registry@1thesanctuary.com as Bishop Nicholas's diocese is in the legal purview of the Diocese of Lincoln. I have an email already set up for the purpose [ironically called RobertWilloughby@gmx.co.uk] so I can do so anonymously. I will draw his attention to your posts about Bishop Nicholas, and And then God help you. Mark Bishop is well known as a merciless stickler for probity in social media, following a series of public scandals at Lincoln which made it a laughing stock in the Province.

    I have had enough of you, Gene, and I am going to see that you are stamped on like the poisonous reptile that you are. Every time I cut you a bit of slack you take advantage, because you are a fake, bogus all the way through, and I am tired of your taking advantage of my charity. Every time I show you any mercy you simply exploit it, and enough is enough.

    So take the post down, leave it up, do what the hell you like, but do it knowing that The Revd His Honour Judge Mark Bishop will be reading your libellous posts about Bishop Chamberlain by this time on Thursday.

    You might be wise to run for the hills and never come back, but I honestly don't give a shit either way. You are a malicious, malignant, vicious, spiteful apology for a Christian, and it is past time you were exposed as such.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Why do you keep on about Bishop Chamberlain? I did not libel him and indeed wrote quite complimentary things about him.

    GENE

    ReplyDelete
  14. Detterling my comment has been removed but given your support for all things gay why reference to your nephew being gay should cause you pain is a mystery.

    I have removed the comment because I'm a pretty decent guy and I don't wish to cause you pain.

    Re a change in the teaching of the C of E about homosexual acts - don't be absurd. The Catholic Church welcomes gays, couples singles whatever, but that does not mean that its teaching on homosexual acts being disordered and intrinsically morally evil does not apply.

    Gene

    ReplyDelete
  15. It is because I won’t have my nephew’s name soiled by your cheap and nasty jeering from your dirty mind and filthy mouth. It’s because his sexuality (which is only a part of who he is) is none of your fucking business. And it’s because you have been told that on this blog MY FAMILY IS OFF LIMITS. And I know that if I cut you the meagrest slack you will take advantage because your ethical code is that of sewer rat.

    But in any case it is all academic.

    This morning I showed the screenshots of your libellous posts about Bishop Nicholas to a former Chancellor of the Newcastle Diocese and his view is that they should be sent to Mark Bishop at Lincoln for his assessment. And before you start bleating about “exposure” and “free speech”, shut up and listen.

    I have no intention of revealing any details about you to the Chancellor at Lincoln. On the other hand should he investigate the matter (and my Newcastle diocesan friend said he would undoubtedly have done so in a matter of this kind when he was in office), then the investigation will begin by finding out who you are - you have been warned. Similarly, your right to free speech is not at hazard - simply whether or not you have abused that right to commit a libel.

    Mind you, there is no point in taking the offending posts down - my screenshots show very clearly your blog’s title, the dates of posting and selected comments from our subsequent set-to. The only way for you to be completely safe would be for you to close your blog, but, as a searingly honest proponent of free speech you will, I am confident, be content fearlessly to have your freedom of speech subjected to the scrutiny of law. You remain confident that you are in the right, so what have you got to lose?

    ReplyDelete
  16. You forget I know about the Law. I taught 'A' Level Law for several years.

    The is no way I have libeled Revd Chamberlain.

    Gene

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, and you once banged on about criminal libel, three years after the offence had been abolished.

      And if there is no way you have libelled [Sp] Bishop Chamberlain then you have no worries, do you?

      Delete
  17. And you can tell the Chancellor at Lincoln to kiss my ass. He has absolutely no right to investigate anything about me.

    Gene

    ReplyDelete
  18. Thanks for this interesting screenshot.

    The job of the Chancellor of a Diocese is to ensure that the law of the land and the law of the church work in sync and protect the interests of members. "Protecting the interests" of the clergy means investigating such things as possible libel uttered against
    Bishops. Far from "having no right" [your arrogance is as breathtaking as your ignorance] to investigate possible libel uttered by you against Bishop Nicholas, it is his DUTY, you clown. As to whether an action could lie is very much an open question - but having your blog investigated is not only in Bishop Nicholas's interest but also in the public interest, so stop whistling in the dark and pissing into the wind - you will end up deafened and covered in piss - again.

    Not quite "game, set and match", but definitely "Advantage....Detterling", wouldn't you say?

    ReplyDelete
  19. And you can once more tell the Chancellor at Lincoln to kiss my ass.

    If I have committed a libel let me be sued. No C of E prat has any right to interfere.

    Gene

    ReplyDelete
  20. Oh, stop it Gene - you are simply talking for the sake of talking. You are quite right that if you have libelled Bishop Nicholas you should be sued. And the person who will do that will be the Chancellor of the Lincoln Diocese, the the legal officer responsible for ensuring that church and civil law are properly observed both by the church and those who, like you, seek to denigrate it and attack its clergy - as witness your frequent assertion [also screenshot and dated every time it has appeared in the last twelve months] that the "Church of England is fucked". Your calling Revd His Honour Mark Bishop a prat who should kiss your arse is simply another piece of your shallow bravado - so why not shut up and stop making a tit of yourself?

    ReplyDelete
  21. Advantage.....Detterling!

    ReplyDelete
  22. What frightens me, Gene is your total failure to learn from experience because of your pathologically bloated self-importance. You still think that repeating a lie often enough will cause it to become true; that replying to a reasoned argument with “Bollocks!” somehow refutes the argument; and that if you have the last word in an argument - no matter how irrelevant or untrue - you have won it. You are the same shallow, dirty minded bigot that you were in 2004 on TES Opinion. You were full of shit then; and you are full of shit now. I would feel sorry for you did I not despise you so much.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Detterling any of my former Sixth Form 'A' Level Law students would tie you in knots for writing such bollocks. He/she would correctly spot that it's ludicrous to talk about a libel action here. Such a student would quickly tell the Chancellor of Lincoln Diocese to f**k off and tell you to get stuffed.


    GENE

    ReplyDelete
  24. Ah yes now we reach the bluster and piffling stage.

    You still don’t get it, you poor sad sod?

    I don’t care twopence whether or not you are sued for libel or, if you are, whether or not such a suit would lie.

    The point is that any investigation sponsored by a Diocesan Chancellor will be taken seriously - and will involve an official investigation of your blog and its authorship.

    If you are at ease with that, then you must even more stupid than I thought.

    Anyway: screenshots and a covering briefing to Lincoln tomorrow and we shall see what we shall see.

    ReplyDelete
  25. "The point is that any investigation sponsored by a Diocesan Chancellor will be taken seriously - and will involve an official investigation of your blog and its authorship."

    Ha! Ha! Ha! Taken seriously by who? Ha! Ha! Ha!

    GENE

    ReplyDelete
  26. We’ll see how well this bravado holds up if and when an investigation starts. You don’t seem to realise what that will entail - full disclosure of your identity for a start.

    ReplyDelete