The most popular Catholic outside the Vatican: Bishop Barron
Fox News Digital shadowed
Bishop Robert Barron for a day and spoke with him about the death of New
Atheism, partisan politics, stand-up comedy, and why he's not a fan of public
excommunications
By Timothy H.J. Nerozzi Fox News
Published May 12, 2024 8:00am EDT
Bishop Barron on the difficulties of evangelization
Bishop Robert Barron explains the need for a dynamic set of skills when
evangelizing in modern society.
It's
common knowledge that the most widely-followed Catholic prelate in the world
is Pope Francis —
Bishop of Rome, Prince of the Apostles and Supreme Pontiff of the Universal
Church.
But
less obvious is the runner-up — Robert Barron, bishop of
Winona-Rochester, online evangelist and founder of Word on Fire
Ministries. Barron doesn’t hold any special position in the
Catholic Church’s hierarchy. On paper, he’s the simple diocesean bishop of a
midsize Minnesota diocese. But through his internet presence and public
ministry, a religious revival of global proportions is underway.
The bishop has over 1 million
subscribers on YouTube, 3 million followers on Facebook and close to 500,000 on
Instagram. Barron has the ear of conservative intellectuals, elected officials,
Hollywood entertainers and political activists shaping modern society. He has
been invited to speak by executives at companies such as Google and Amazon, and
maintains a dizzying schedule that takes him from Washington, D.C., to Rome to
Prague to London and beyond.
BISHOP BARRON FIGHTS ‘WIDESPREAD SECULARIZATION,’ ‘DUMBED-DOWN’ FAITH WITH AGGRESSIVE PLAN
Fox News Digital traveled to the
Diocese of Winona-Rochester to follow Barron for a day in his ministry and get
a glimpse behind the scenes of Catholicism’s most successful modern evangelist.
He recalled that he was still just a
priest when he published his first YouTube video in 2007 — a review of the
Martin Scorscese film "The Departed." It got just over 100 views. At
the time, he was ecstatic about such success.
"I thought, 'Really? 100 people
watched it? Terrific!" he told Fox News Digital.
It was
from these humble beginnings that Barron’s evangelization grew, becoming one of
the first Catholic voices pushing
back against growing nihilism and anti-Christian rhetoric in American culture.
As the demand for more meaty explorations of the faith has risen, the bishop
has expanded into Bible studies, academic lectures, theological lessons and
historical documentaries about saints that helped shape the Christian religion.
The bishop speaks and carries himself
the same both on-camera and off. He speaks in a casual tone, but doesn't
attempt to dumb down theological language — Latin vocabulary is peppered
throughout his dialogues and his mind is a near-comprehensive reference catalog
for quoting Vatican II documents.
Speaking on controversial moral debates — abortion, gender ideology, IVF, the death penalty — he takes the tone of a sympathetic yet stern parent. There's not much scolding of the opposition, but even less negotiation on fundamental principles. This approachable — yet uncompromising — disposition may be the source of his ministry's wild success.
Barron is one of numerous faith
leaders sifting through the rubble left by the rise and rapid decline of a
particularly anti-religious movement in the previous decades.
"I think the ‘New Atheist’ wave
came and went. It left behind a lot of very unhappy and directionless
people," Barron told Fox News Digital.
The movement he referenced was a
short-lived phenomenon in the early 2000s led by the so-called "Four
Horsemen" of atheism — writer Christopher Hitchens, neuroscientist Sam
Harris, evolutionary biologist Richard Dawkins and cognitive scientist Daniel
Dennett.
More than a decade from the New Atheists’ peak in relevance, not much is left of their march against organized religion. This year, the number of religious "nones" (individuals without affiliation to an organized religion) dropped for the first time since 2016. Even individuals without formal religious affiliations more often self-describe themselves as "spiritual" or at least "agnostic" instead of outright "atheist."
Barron isn’t surprised New Atheism
failed to stick.
"I think our culture, which has
so emphasized the primacy of [one’s] own choice determining value, has left
behind a lot of broken people," Barron said. "And they're
looking."
Christianity
— and the Catholic Church in particular — has seen a dramatic re-entry into the public consciousness.
High-profile converts, including actors, politicians and even some former New
Atheists themselves, have brought traditional, apostolic Christianity to the
forefront of the culture war for the American mind.
In the face of wayward souls
searching for answers, Barron describes his job simply — "proclaiming the
Gospel." It's not an easy job.
"You have to have a lot of little medicines in the black bag," Barron said at his Word on Fire offices in Rochester, Minnesota. "When you're going to go deal with someone pastorally, you don't know where they're going to be, what their issues are, what their pathologies might be, what their hang-ups are. So you'd better have a lot of things in your bag."
He made the comment while reflecting
on the recent conversion of Ayaan Hirsi Ali, the Somali-born American writer
who became one of the loudest voices in the New Atheism movement.
Last
year, Ali renounced her past advocacy for religious skepticism and declared herself a Christian. She is in good company.
Celebrities who have recently declared a new Christian affiliation include
entertainer Russell Brand, artist Kat Von D, and rapper Daddy Yankee. OnlyFans model Nala Ray now claims to be seeking
salvation after abandoning her highly lucrative career in professional nudity.
High-profile
converts to the Catholic Church specifically have come from a variety of
cultural spheres as well — actors including Shia LaBeouf,
Rob Schneider, and Dasha Nekrasova have embraced the faith in recent
years. Porn star Bree Solstad renounced
her adult entertainment work last month and converted after a trip to Rome and
Assisi.
In the
political realm, recent public converts to the faith include Sen. JD Vance and
political pundit Candace Owens. Author and culture commentator Jordan Peterson
recently applauded his wife Tammy Peterson's entry into the Catholic Church
after a miraculous recovery from cancer.
Famous converts can be fickle and
prone to disappointing believers not long after their declaration of faith.
Kanye West declared himself "born again" in 2019 and has since
appeared to have abandoned the faith. Britney Spears similarly expressed
affiliation with the Catholic Church in 2021 before renouncing the religion
just a year later.
Regardless of which public
conversions endure, their increased prominence points to a larger social
consciousness about Christianity.
Even the world of stand-up comedy — for
decades a soapbox for militant, self-proclaimed atheists such as George Carlin
and Ricky Gervais — is now flush with personalities such as Shane Gillis and
Tim Dillon, self-professed "Irish-Catholics" who are far from
churchgoers, but talk about seeking spirituality amid sometimes barbed jokes
about their baptismal religion.
Barron baptized the son of comedian
John Mulaney (who often explores his complicated relationship with religion on
stage) while serving as a bishop in Los Angeles. He told Fox News Digital he
finds Mulaney's public wrestling match with Catholicism to be "very
interesting to watch as a comedian" and "very funny."
"I think what's happening — it's
not yet baptisms, marriages, confirmations. I think it's a broader, more
elemental thing going on now, an interest — people crossing a river, people
entering a door. They're coming toward it," Barron told Fox News Digital.
Specific
dioceses have reported entries into the Catholic Church are up by 50-70%, but Barron acknowledges that
big-picture statistics on church participation "haven't really turned
around yet." He instead sees conversions and renewed interest in Christianity
as the beginning of a cultural shift that will manifest more tangible fruit
down the road.
Modern Catholic converts frequently
point to the Church’s distinctive attributes as a major influence on their
decision to explore the faith — universal liturgy, firmly defined doctrine,
institutional hierarchy and a theological tradition that can be traced back to
the time of Jesus Christ.
"The mainstream Protestant
churches became so secularized. They became, in many cases, just an echo of the
left-wing secular culture," Barron said. "So they have very little to
offer."
"[Catholicism has] hung on to a
dogmatic tradition, a liturgical tradition. We take the saints seriously, we
take art and liturgy seriously. And all of that, I think, does attract people
intellectually," he added.
While
a bedrock level of faith is central to all denominations of Christianity, Catholicism embraces
a unique tradition of theological inquiry that encourages students to
interrogate their own beliefs and seek logical answers within a Biblical and
historical framework with the guidance of a millennia-old magisterium.
"The church has this very
articulate moral tradition, and there's a tendency in our country to subjectivize
this business," said Barron. "The fact that we have this rigorously
thought through, objective, intellectual tradition, I think is attractive and
that is one reason why people find Catholicism compelling. The idea is we keep
proclaiming it in season and out, whether it's popular or not."
This renewed cultural cache has
presented new problems for a Christian denomination that has always been a
foreign-coded minority in the United States. With all eyes on the Catholic
Church, the uninformed expect the institution to be dynamic and active about
public politics in a way it has never been.
Whether
it’s disagreements with Democrats about abortion or feuds with Republicans over the death
penalty, the Catholic Church’s moral teaching is too rigid to fit
snugly within either party — a departure from the left-right binary that
defines American politics.
Barron’s popularity and well-educated
perspective on the faith has led many Catholics and non-Catholics alike to look
to him as a political figurehead — a proposition Barron is unwilling to
entertain.
"The thing we can't do, and we
don't do, is partisan politics," he said. "We can't get in the
business of saying, 'Okay, don't vote for him, vote for this guy.' Bishops
don't do that and priests shouldn't do that."
Keeping out of partisan politics is
difficult for Catholic leaders when the President of the United States is a
pro-choice member of the church.
President
Biden has made his self-professed Catholic faith such
a cornerstone of his public image that he is frequently photographed gripping
rosary beads or making the Sign of the Cross. At the same time, he lobbies for
policies that directly contradict the core ethical teachings of the church.
Discontented laity and non-Catholics turn to the church hierarchy in search of catharsis — or more cynically, perhaps a chance to score political points against enemy politicians. The most hysterical culture warriors even demand Catholic prelates place censures and excommunications on elected officials as a show of force.
Political partisans have questioned
why Biden and other Catholic lawmakers haven't been excommunicated by the pope
or their local bishops. Some even write to Word on Fire demanding to know why
Barron himself hasn't placed an excommunication on the president — an action he
is incapable of taking and one he would not recommend regardless.
"It would be completely
counterproductive, something as dramatic as that," Barron said.
He continued, "The bishop can
and should speak, first of all, personally and privately with the guy and try
to convince him that there's a problem with this position. I think that's a
good opening move, prudentially."
"Now, what do you do if he stays
adamant in his position? I think it's okay then — even in a public way — to say
‘This is an inconsistent view.’ You know, excommunication is such a kind of
dramatic and final approach. So I understand the pope's reticence about that or
any bishop's reticence about that," Barron said. "But I think [it’s
good] to be publicly unambiguous about the church's view and how this
politician is out of line with it. And he shouldn't be, as a Catholic. I have
no problem with that."
Barron has made his frustration with
Biden’s inconsistencies in Catholicism and pro-choice politics well known.
"We certainly can talk about the
moral issues as they play themselves out in the political arena. I've done that
over and over again with abortion, euthanasia, all kinds of different
things," Barron said. "I criticized Biden for being a self-professing
Catholic at the same time advocating the most radical access to abortion
possible and pointing out how inconsistent that is."
Many other Catholic bishops have made
similar criticisms of the president, including Cardinal Wilton Gregory of
Washington and even Pope Francis himself.
"I
leave it to [President Biden's] conscience and
that he speaks to his bishop, his pastor, his parish priest about that
incoherence," the pope remarked in 2022.
To
Barron, the insistence that the Catholic Church has a special expectation to
manifest punishments against its disobedient laity is misguided: "Why
haven't Protestant leaders then excommunicated Bill Clinton?
I mean, he took the same radical position."
In a democratic nation, the onus of
responsibility for religious dysfunction in politics falls to the laity, he
argues.
"Cardinal [Francis] George, who
I admire very much — people would come to him and ask, 'Why aren't you doing
more about abortion and all this?' And he would say, ‘Look, you people run the
society. You elect these people,'" Barron recalled. "So, I'm here to
tell you what Catholic truth is and how to live. But now off you go. You
politicians and lawyers and scientists and activists — go, go, go."
Since the Second Vatican Council
concluded in 1965, the Catholic Church has urged the laity to participate more
fully in the works of the church by evangelizing in their own secular lives.
It is a key development that Barron
feels has been forgotten in the decades since. The bishop is quick to complain
that laity too often come to him asking for advice in fields they know far more
about than him.
"If I would bring in business
leaders, entrepreneurs, investors, and get them in a room and read the gospel
for the coming Sunday […] I'd say, ‘Okay, now all of you — see, judge, and
act," Barron said. "What do you see in your world? How do you judge
it in light of what I've just told you in light of the gospel? And now, what do
[you] do to Christify the world? Because I don't know. I'm not an investor, I
don't know that world. But they do."
With dogmatic atheism in the rearview
mirror, Barron’s most pressing concern for the future is the coming generations
of children who will grow up with neither religion nor rigorously considered
disbelief. Instead, they'll likely mature in a society lacking contemplation of
a transcendent dimension altogether — "the first generation to lose
that."
"If you've really lost a sense
of God, the importance of God — of religion, of ritual — you're going to live
in this very buffered space of the secular order. And that has never been the
case in human history," the bishop said. "There's always been the village
atheist, but the overwhelming majority of people have seen their happiness as a
function of a relationship to a highest good, to a transcendent good."
But Barron insists there is plenty of
hope. He believes it because he’s seen the seeds of his own efforts bud and
bloom in front of his own eyes in the most unexpected ways.
"There is a kind of awakening, a
kind of revival going on. And the very fact this thing that I started years ago
— so tiny and so experimental and insignificant — how it would develop and
grow. That's a good sign to me of that," Barron concluded.
"There's a yearning. There's an
openness to it. So I take hope in that."
I quite admired Bishop Barron once. Then I learned that he is always assisted by a team of bodybuilders. No time for bodybuilders.
ReplyDeleteBishop Barron is Gene “Fetherlite” Vincent’s favourite kind of bishop - a demagogue gobshite who saves Gene the trouble of thinking for himself and whose bigotry chimes with Gene’s own. Bellend speaks to bellend.
ReplyDeleteBut enough of this persiflage: let us return to the point at issue that Gene is frantically trying to push down the page on this awful blog.
ReplyDelete[1] "the pinko-liberal left" does not exist as a choate political entity with a unanimous opinion. A non existent body can neither condone nor condemn anything.
[2] You have been completely unable to prove that any body of left wing opinion such as the Parliamentary or National Labour party condoned the PIE. It is true that several left wing figures were simultaneously members of the Labour Party and the National Council for Civil Liberties. This does not mean that they condoned the PIE.
[3] The British left-wing did not condone the PIE, but even if they had, this would have had nothing to do with the fact that an American priest's abuse of children, which could have been prevented had Ratzinger unfrocked him when he was asked to in 1985, was allowed by this criminal dereliction to continue for another three years. This happened irrespective of any left wing viewpoints in another country. To suggest that there is a connection is demented. [4] The NCCL membership comprised all shades of political opinion, and despite being challenged to several times, you have offered no evidence for the political allegiances of its members.
"Compare this to the case of the PIE which advocated adults having sex with children and which was affiliated for almost ten years to the pinko/liberal extreme Left NCCL. Plus two future Labour Government ministers were involved up to their eyes. Plus a Labour Party parliamentary candidate, Peter Tatchell, advocating adult sex with children."
Simply repeating this pack of lies is yet another proof that you are barking mad. And as for this ridiculous allegation: "You and your ilk condoned all this Detterling", that is the kind of offensively moronic and cowardly filth to which you would not dare to sign your name, and I will not dignify it with a response.
I have neither bluffed, blustered or slithered in this matter. I have acknowledged what is true - that the PIE was affiliated to the NCCL what time three Labour politicians were also members of the NCCL, that Mr Tatchell also supported the PIE what time he was a Labour candidate - although in supporting the PIE he was speaking on his own behalf, not the Labour Party's. I have pointed out the falsities, fallacies, lies and smears involved in your nonsensical attempt to prove that a non-existent body of left wing opinion condoned or condones the PIE, as well as pointing out why you are doing it - your complete failure to defend Ratzinger.
FACT 1: In refusing to unfrock Stephen Keisle in 1985, citing "the good of the Catholic Church" and the necessity of avoiding "distress to the Catholic faithful" Ratzinger enabled him to go on abusing children for a further three years. This is simply stating a fact, and if it shows that Ratzinger behaved with a callous disregard for the welfare of Catholic children to avoid a public scandal, then that is his problem, not my responsibility.
FACT 2: This has fuck all to do with the left wing of political opinion in the UK, fuck all to do with the NCCL and the PIE, and everything to do with your desperation to conceal the criminal negligence of Joseph Ratzinger, who had the opportunity to prevent children being sexually abused but criminally failed to take it.
There is only one true thing in your farrago of nonsense - that I am a very old man, and that my lifetime achievements in four careers - teacher, counsellor, writer and musician - have been modest.
But at least they have been real: I feel no need to invent critical acclaim for a vanity publication like "Granny Barkes fell in Woolworths".