Saturday 25 August 2018

On this day, the day that Pope Francis visits Ireland shall we remember the never-to-be-forgotten fiasco of our New Atheist friends, Dawkins, Robertson, Fry, Goldacre et al coming a humiliating cropper when they threatened to have Pope Benedict arrested on his visit to Britain in 2010? Well, yes I think we shall.

On this day, the day that Pope Francis visits Ireland shall we remember  the never-to-be-forgotten fiasco of our New Atheist friends, Dawkins, Robertson, Fry, Goldacre et al coming a humiliating cropper when they threatened to have Pope Benedict arrested on his visit to Britain in 2010? Well, yes I think we shall.





How I loved that! What a humiliation! And Geoffrey Robertson just after he had received a papal blessing at a general audience with the Pope in St Peter's Square. How they fell on their faces. Their pathetic protest was brushed aside in the tide of affection and goodwill towards Pope Benedict. Wonderful days! They took it so badly. Dawkins went into a right sulk and blamed everybody but himself.


Richard Dawkins ... he went into a proper sulk


Geoffrey Robertson was just as bad. He went into a lot of twaddle about how he just happened to be in St Peter's Square and just happened to be there when the Pope arrived and just happened to be there when the Pope gave a blessing. Pathetic! He then denied that he had suggested having the Pope arrested - although he had stood shoulder to shoulder with Dawkins, Goldacre, Fry et al. Pathetic!
Image result for geoffrey robertson qc




Geoffrey Robertson ... Pathetic!

(Christopher Hitchens had also been campaigning with this lot, but I will pass over that as he has now gone to meet the God he claimed did not exist. I'm sure God will be merciful to him.)


Christopher Hitchens ... now gone to meet the God he claimed did not exist


I started a thread about this on the TES Opinion Forum. It ran to almost 2,000 posts. How I made the clique squirm! It was another episode of "C'mon clique. Make my day."

On the day on which Pope Francis begins his visit to Ireland let's remember this...

On the day on which Pope Francis begins his visit to Ireland let's remember this...


How Benedict XVI vanquished the New Atheists


Ten years ago today Benedict began his transformative papacy
Ten years ago today Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger was elected Pope, taking the name Benedict XVI. One surprise of the papacy that followed was that his visit to Britain was a such resounding success – so successful, in fact, that the benefits are still felt to this day.
In the months leading up to the papal visit in September 2010, we had militant atheists, campaigning secularists and many sections of the anti-Catholic lobby doing their worst to cast a shadow over the visit.
The National Secular Society launched its (grammatically suspect) “Protest the Pope” campaign, making known to anyone who would listen its beef that the taxpayer was footing some of the bill for the state visit. It ran an online petition, as well as printing T-shirts with the slogan, “Pope Nope”.
The human rights activist Peter Tatchell even threatened to arrest Benedict and put him on trial for “crimes against humanity”.
Then there was that leaked memo, exposed by the Telegraph, in which civil servants lampooned the Pope’s visit by suggesting he should open an abortion ward during his trip and launch a range of papal-branded condoms.
But the British public generally had little sympathy for the protesters. They felt they protested too much, and the Pope’s visit went swimmingly.
Perhaps the turning point was when a young Catholic, Paschal Uche, welcomed Pope Benedict on the steps of Westminster Cathedral. Paschal was training to be a pharmacist at the time, and is now a seminarian. The sight of eloquent and well-adjusted Catholics such as Paschal taking centre stage did a lot to strip away the anti-Catholic prejudice stirred up by the protesters.
Campaigning secularists and self-styled New Atheists lost a lot of credibility during the visit. The campaigners poured so much of their energy into trying to put Benedict on trial, as if he were some base criminal, that they acted as though the British public needed safeguarding from the grandfatherly, gentle man in white.
When Benedict arrived on our shores, the public saw through all the huffing and puffing. Parts of the mainstream media also looked rather silly. Before the visit they had given lots of ink and airtime to anyone with an anti-papal axe to grind.
The fruits of the visit are still being enjoyed today. The profile of Catholics in Britain has been raised and anti-Catholic bigotry has lessened. That explains why Pope Francis’s detractors don’t enjoy much of an audience among ordinary Britons nowadays. And New Atheists have never quite been given the same platform as they were before Benedict’s visit.

Thursday 23 August 2018

FROM THE ASCENDED MASTERS ON THE SEVENTH PLANE...

FROM THE ASCENDED MASTERS ON THE SEVENTH PLANE...

I was just drifting off to sleep last night when my bedroom filled with a strange, ethereal light. I raised my head from the pillow to look out the window thinking that maybe something supernatural had engulfed Uxbridge. But no... it was a visit from Doris Stokes.  She stood by the bottom of the bed. The conversation went like this:

DORIS: Greetings Gene. I bring you a message from the Ascended Masters on the Seventh Plane.

GENE: Fire away Doris. I'm listening.

DORIS; The Ascended Masters feel you are neglecting your old friend Detterling and they request you put this right forthwith.

GENE: But Doris, Detterling on 29th December 2017 wrote me the most  abusive message imaginable and ended our friendship. As you know I did everything possible to be friendly with the old boy - even offering to act as an emissary in bringing about reconciliation between the aging pseud and his estranged nephew.

DORIS: Nevertheless Gene that is the message from the Ascended Masters. See what you can do to bring Detters back to your acquaintance.

GENE: Fine Doris. However I feel that the old boy may now have developed Alzheimer's.
He  may not know who Gene is anymore.

DORIS: You will have eternal reward if you bring him back.

GENE: Okay Doris. Let the Ascended Masters know that I will do my best to take care of the pompous windbag. I will also take care of Delia. Fellini will see to that! Tee! Hee! Hee! Hee!

DORIS: Now Gene, behave. We'll have none of that. Bye Gene.

GENE: Bye Doris.

Image result for Doris Stokes
DORIS STOKES




Wednesday 22 August 2018

St Mary’s (where Gene did his PGCE) shows a Catholic university can flourish in Britain



St Mary’s (where Gene did his PGCE) shows a Catholic university can flourish in Britain



Higher education is a ruthlessly competitive business, but St Mary's shows Catholicism and higher education go hand in hand
There is a heatwave, and it is clear that Victorian buildings, however beautiful, are not ideal places in which to work in such weather. The marked absence of neckwear among the senior management team suggests that even the more conservative among us have decided to accommodate ourselves to the times.
If only it were that easy on the political front. With threats from Brexit and Trump on the international front, and from Corbyn and the least competent government since Lord North on the home front, it is hard to feel that things can only get better. As a deep-dyed conservative, this is what I expect. That anti-Semitism has made a comeback is deeply depressing. These are times to try the spirit.
As colleagues pack themselves off for exotic (or not so exotic) destinations, and the thoughts of others turn to the holidays, those of this pro-vice-chancellor turn to something most academics scorn: league tables.
It is almost obligatory to play them down. Like any measurement of performance that is not purely financial, the university league table metrics have their weaknesses. But the days when universities could grandly refuse any form of assessment other than their own are, thankfully, long dead.
Our students here at St Mary’s University, Twickenham, pay £9,250 a year for their tuition. If you add on living costs, their total bill across three years is in the region of £50k. They have the right to know that what they are getting is the first-rate education that we, along with all other universities, claim to be offering.
So it was a delight when the National Student Survey figures recently came through to see that we have risen 56 places and, at 88 per cent student satisfaction overall, have the most satisfied students in London.
I am delighted that the efforts of our own students’ union presidents, Conal Baxter last year and Natalie Hobkirk this year, have been rewarded, and that the great work put in by all teaching and support staff is thought by our students to be of such a high standard. Our rise in the table to 80th nationally prompts a smile, much needed after a year in which we have reorganised St Mary’s.
A former vice-chancellor under whom I served elsewhere once described a reorganisation as the “last refuge of the intellectually bankrupt vice-chancellor”, before going on, 18 months later, to launch one. Times change, and if we do not change with them we risk finding ourselves on the wrong side of what Harold Macmillan once reputedly called “Events, dear boy.”
I came to St Mary’s two years ago, attracted by the prospect of helping to create a genuinely Catholic university. With Francis Campbell as vice-chancellor and Ruth Kelly as one of my fellow pro-vice-chancellors, a formidable team was gathering. But we knew that the inheritance would not be an easy one to take forward.
Higher education in Britain is a ruthlessly competitive market, with universities able to take as many students as they can attract. When I read that the Department for Education is surprised that so many universities are making unconditional offers, I wonder whether ministers realise that their actions have consequences, rather than believing that their responsibilities are confined to their time in office.
At an educational institution founded in 1850 by the Catholic Church, we have to think in rather longer terms. We are creating a place that will show that Catholicism and higher education go hand in hand – after all, the first universities in this country were religious foundations, and this conservative is delighted to revive that link.
Which is where those league tables come in. As a grammar school boy from a working-class background, I am competitive. If tables exist, I’d rather be high up them than low down. To see St Mary’s rising up the league is satisfying, but it is only an incentive to do better.
We are fortunate in having recruited two excellent new deans, Symeon Dagkas and Adam Longcroft. Along with Karen Sanders, they represent a formidable array of talent. Adam remarked that between the four of us we had more than a century of experience of higher education. I suppose I have been around a long time (40 years now in universities), and look like it.
This is not the university as I knew it back then – and thank God. We look to the future with confidence.
Professor John Charmley is pro-vice-chancellor for academic strategy at St Mary’s University, Twickenham

Image result for st mary's twickenham university

Oprah Winfrey Promotes “Shout Your Abortion” Movement Where Women Brag About Their Abortions

Oprah Winfrey Promotes “Shout Your Abortion” Movement Where Women Brag About Their Abortions

National   Micaiah Bilger   Aug 20, 2018   |   5:38PM    Washington, DC

Oprah Winfrey waded deeper into political waters this summer by promoting the “Shout Your Abortion” movement and its attempts to normalize the killing of unborn babies.
The July issue of her “O” magazine featured “Shout Your Abortion” founder Amelia Bonow in its “Inspiration” section, CNS News reports.
Bonow, who began the campaign to urge women to brag about aborting their unborn babies, soon will be coming out with a new book by the same title, according to the report.
She told the magazine how it all began in 2015: “[W]hen I found out that the House of Representatives had voted to defund Planned Parenthood. I kind of unraveled.
“I opened Facebook and, without thinking, wrote, ‘Like a year ago, I had an abortion at Planned Parenthood…and I remember this experience with a nearly inexpressible level of gratitude.’ I hit Post 153 words later, and everything changed,” she continued.
Bonow said the campaign really took off when a friend shared her post on Twitter with the hashtag #ShoutYourAbortion.
“On some level, I’d internalized the stigma—though I honestly wasn’t ashamed. Then why hide? It wasn’t out of character for me to disclose something so personal online. What was out of character was my silence,” she said.
She blamed the pro-life movement for trying to silence women who have had abortions, saying: “The anti- choice movement wants it to be terrifying to speak the truth, because we can’t advocate for something we can’t say out loud. But the more of us who speak out, the clearer it becomes that all sorts of people have abortions, including people you love.”
But it really is her own movement, the pro-abortion movement, that silences women whose abortion stories do not fit their narrative. Bonow’s pro-abortion campaign is not the first abortion story-telling movement either.
Long ago, pro-life advocates recognized the power of individual people and their stories in the abortion debate. The Silent No More Awareness campaign is just one example of the many pro-life storytelling outreaches. It encourages people who experienced pain and regret after their abortions to share their stories publicly, and its website documents thousands of stories of mothers, fathers, grandparents and others who experienced deep pain and remorse because of unborn babies’ abortion deaths.
“O” magazine is doing a disservice to its readers by promoting the “Shout Your Abortion” campaign. Bonow’s movement gives the impression that women are glad they aborted their unborn babies. The truth is that some women regret their abortions and others do not, but no matter what the women’s feelings, their abortions destroyed another human being, their own child’s chance to ever have a story.

Margaret Thatcher’s Christian values are all too often forgotten

Margaret Thatcher’s Christian values are all too often forgotten

No politician today would dare voice Thatcher's views on the family
Reading People Like Us by Caroline Slocock (Biteback Publishing) was an unusual exercise. The author, who became the first ever female private secretary at No 10 during the final 18 months of Margaret Thatcher’s premiership was, by her own admission, a left-wing feminist. Thatcher’s political views were naturally very different and she heartily disliked the label “feminist”; she had reached the pinnacle of politics on her own merits and felt that other women should do the same.
Nonetheless, Slocock, looking back after nearly 30 years, provides a sympathetic, sensitive and generous portrait of this formidable woman, admitting her initial prejudices and confessing to being “shocked to discover [Thatcher’s] empathy, her charm and her underlying vulnerability as well as her inner reserves of strength.”
At her job interview, having been warned that Thatcher would never appoint a woman to the post, she noticed the Prime Minister’s “spontaneity and grace.” She was neither “Boudicca or a witch” but a woman “who listened, was interested in other people, showed a natural ability to put herself in others’ shoes and cared about the emotional…side of things.”
Slocock does not pick up on Thatcher’s strong Christian views, shaped by the Methodism of her childhood, and is dismissive of state occasions like Trooping the Colour (which Thatcher thought of as “what we do best”), revealing her own preferences for “the Beatles, the Rolling Stones, Henry Moore, David Hockney and Terence Conran – future-focused creativity…not backward-looking regimental pomp.” What she does not see is that Thatcher was formed by the grocery shop, the War, listening to Churchill’s speeches, and that “regimental pomp” simply meant the premier’s belief in tradition, monarchy and attending to history – all staunchly conservative values.
Slocock’s most telling recollection is not when Thatcher breaks down in her final Cabinet meeting as she reads her resignation speech, causing the author and several of the men present to weep alongside her; it is when Slocock is helping the premier to prepare a speech on family values. Thatcher tells the author firmly that “Children need security and must be brought up in a stable, loving environment in which parents offer time, affection and guidance. These things are most likely when the parents are married – and stay married.” It goes without saying that Thatcher assumed marriage to be between a man and woman and instinctively recoiled from divorce because of its effect on the children. In this she simply reflects her generation, her upbringing and her beliefs.
No prime minister today could ever voice such things; it would be almost enough to bring down a government. Some people consider this progress. Thatcher would not have thought so.

Monday 20 August 2018

Weinstein accuser Asia Argento made deal to pay her own sexual assault accuser, bombshell report says


Asia Argento, sexual assault accuser and accused: One #MeToo story doesn’t cancel out the other

 

Weinstein accuser Asia Argento made deal to pay her own sexual assault accuser, bombshell report says


Actress Asia Argento, one of the first prominent women to accuse disgraced movie mogul Harvey Weinstein of sexual assault, agreed to pay $380,000 to an actor who accused her of sexually assaulting him when he was 17 years old, The New York Times reported Sunday night.
The actor claimed that the assault took place in a California hotel room in 2013, according to the report. The age of consent in California is 18.
Neither Argento's representatives nor the actor's attorney immediately responded to Fox News' request for comment.
The newspaper obtained documents sent between lawyers for Argento and the accuser that laid out a payment schedule. The paper also obtained a photograph dated May 9, 2013 that showed the two lying in a bed together.
On that date, according to a notice of intent to sue document sent to Argento's then-lawyer in November, Argento met the actor at the Ritz-Carlton hotel in Marina del Rey, Calif. After giving him alcohol, Argento kissed him and performed oral sex on him before the two had sexual intercourse, the report said.
The notice of intent asked for $3.5 million in damages. The Times reported that the final agreement was reached in April of this year.
Argento, now 42, played a prominent role in the downfall of Weinstein, the former head of Miramax. In October of last year, The New Yorker published allegations by Argento that Weinstein forcibly performed oral sex on her in 1997.
"I was not willing,” she told journalist Ronan Farrow at the time. "I said, 'No, no, no.' ... It's twisted. A big fat man wanting to eat you. It's a scary fairy tale."
Argento added that she occasionally had consensual sexual encounters with Weinstein over the years, because she felt she "had to" and "didn't want to anger him."
The allegations against Weinstein by Argento and other actresses -- including Ashley Judd, Gwenyth Paltrow, Angelina Jolie and Rose McGowan -- gave rise to the global "MeToo" movement and prompted a re-examination of the behavior of prominent men in other industries, most notably media and entertainment.
Weinstein has since been charged in New York with first- and third-degree rape and first-degree commission of a criminal sex act. He faces up to 37 years in prison if convicted.
As of Sunday evening, the pinned tweet on Argento's Twitter account referenced a speech she gave at May's Cannes Film Festival in France, an event she described as Weinstein's "hunting ground."
"For all the brave women who came forward denouncing their predators, and for all the brave women who will come forward in the future," she wrote. "We got the power."