Wednesday 31 May 2023

 ORIGINAL SIN



Article nine from The Anglican Thirty-nine Articles


9. Original or Birth-sin 

Original sin is not found merely in the following of Adam's example (as the Pelagians foolishly say). It is rather to be seen in the fault and corruption which is found in the nature of every person who is naturally descended from Adam. The consequence of this is that man is far gone from his original state of righteousness. In his own nature he is predisposed to evil, the sinful nature in man always desiring to behave in a manner contrary to the Spirit. In every person born into this world there is fund this predisposition which rightly deserves God's anger and condemnation. This infection within man's nature persists even within those who are regenerate. This desire of the sinful nature, which in Greek is called fronema sarkos and is variously translated the wisdom or sensuality or affection or desire of the sinful nature, is not under control of God's law. Although there is no condemnation for those that believe and are baptized, nevertheless the apostle states that any such desire is sinful.


It follows the expressing that God given nature in action cannot be sinful 

If homosexuality is God given, how can expressing that sexuality consensually be sinful?

DETTERLING


Well Detterling? I'm afraid the Anglican Thirty-nine Articles, which accept Original Sin, blows your heretical theory out of the water.

Another lesson for you here: Don't tangle with Gene on Theological/Philosophical issues or on questions of Logic. Gene read Logic and Epistemology as part of the Philosophy component of his degree.



And in any case, the Article about Original Sin is invalidated by Article 20, as follows:


20. The Authority of the Church
The church has authority to decree forms of worship and ceremonies and to decide in controversies concerning the faith. However, it is not lawful for the church to order anything contrary to God's written Word. Nor may it expound one passage of Scripture so that it contradicts another passage. So, although the church is a witness and guardian to Holy Scripture, it must not decree anything contrary to Scripture, nor is it to enforce belief in anything additional to Scripture as essential to salvation.

DETTERLING


Ha! Ha! Ha! You are really floundering now Detterling. Even you don't see that as coming near or anywhere near rescuing your position.

Yesterday you were crowing that only the Catholic Church had the doctrine of Original sin. Article 9 of the Anglican Thirty-nine Articles has torpedoed that claim!


Ergo your absurd contention 'If homosexuality is God given, how can expressing that sexuality consensually be sinful?' is completely untenable. Total Pelagianism.


I said yesterday that the Catholic church had quietly let lapse the doctrine of original sin.

DETTERLING


No. The Catholic Church teaches the Doctrine of Original sin. It has never been let lapse.

The Church of England teaches the Doctrine of Original sin - as per the 39 Articles.


Detterling when one has been defeated as comprehensively as you have been, the best thing to do is make a quiet exit from the fray. Trying to rescue yourself makes you look so undignified and pitiable.


If homosexuality is God given, how can expressing that sexuality consensually be sinful?

DETTERLING

See how wrong you were?

No sodomites shall ever enter the Kingdom of God. Got that?


[1] I said yesterday that the Catholic church had quietly let lapse the doctrine of original sin lapse quietly

DETTERLING

No. The Catholic Church has not let lapse the Doctrine of Original sin.

[2] And the C of E's proclamation of original sin as an article of faith is negated by article 20

DETTERLING

So why do the 39 Articles still contain Article 9?

Detterling you have been destroyed. You have no credibility left in this discussion. And you know it.


If homosexuality is God given, how can expressing that sexuality consensually be sinful?

DETTERLING

It is quite astonishing, even allowing for your impaired intellectual condition, that you could come out with a statement like this.



Diving Deeper into the Seven Deadly Sins

snake, serpent, apple, deception

Most Catholics are familiar with the Seven Deadly Sins, also known as the Seven Capital Sins. These are those sins that engender all other sins, hence why they are called the capital sins — because they are at the head of all other sins. You can read more in my article HERE.

Much spiritual direction, writing, and discussion have surrounded how to combat these sins, and what virtues we ought to strive after that most oppose these sins. For example, those who struggle with pride ought to pray for the grace of humility and take steps to better live out this virtue.

At some point in one’s spiritual journey, as we seek to draw ever closer to the Lord, there will come a point where we recognize that, even if we have truly done battle with our sins, there is still deep, spiritual healing that must take place to thoroughly purify of us of the seven deadly sins.

The Doctor of the Church, St. John of the Cross, explains that there is a deeply spiritual component to these sins, that they can often hide in spiritual guises, and to move further along in the spiritual life, healing is required in these areas.

I want to do a quick survey, following St. John, diving deeper into these deadly sins to suggest where we might need to seek further healing and transformation from the Lord. All quotes from St. John of the Cross come from his work The Dark Night of the Soul as quoted in Ralph Martin’s excellent work, The Fulfillment of All Desire.

Pride

Pride is not simply having a bloated sense of self or putting oneself in the place of God. Even our desire for holiness and perfection can become a source of pride. Jesus tells us to be perfect (Mt. 5:48) and in striving after perfection, we might be tempted to discouragement when we fail to be perfect as our Father is perfect.

St. John writes,

Sometimes they minimize their faults, and at other times they become discouraged by them, since they felt they were already saints and they become impatient and angry with themselves, which is yet another fault.

While we must strive after moral perfection, our reason must be purely to please God. It is possible, however, that our desire for perfection and sanctity is more self-indulgent than it is a desire for the Lord.

St. John continues,

They are often extremely anxious that God remove their faults and imperfections, but their motive is personal peace rather than God. They fail to realize that were God to remove their faults they might very well become more proud and presumptuous.

We ought to consider the question, ‘Why do we want to be perfect?’ If for the sake of God and not for our own sake, then we ought to be humble in the face of our imperfections, patiently awaiting the Lord’s healing.

Envy

The sin of envy, for many, connotes an extreme form of greed — it is a desire for something that someone else has. While envy does include this, a more exact understanding of envy is sorrow at someone else’s good. Envy isn’t wanting your neighbor’s car; envy is being upset or frustrated that your neighbor has a car that you don’t have.

St John of the Cross shows that envy can exist in the spiritual life as well. He writes:

In regard to envy, many of them feel sad about the spiritual good of others and experience sensible grief in noting that their neighbor is ahead of them on the road to perfection, and they do not want to hear others praised. Learning of the virtues of others makes them sad. They cannot bear to hear others being praised without contradicting and undoing these compliments as much as possible.

These scathing words surely ring true. It really can hurt to see when someone else is closer to God, more spiritually mature, and receiving more praise for their goodness and success in the spiritual life. This hurt, despair, and frustration at another’s spiritual good is envy.

To combat this, we must be grateful for the spiritual blessings the Lord has bestowed upon us. We must also pray for the grace to see that another person’s spiritual good does not hurt us or take away from us, rather, it helps build up the Body of Christ and in so doing benefits us.

Avarice

Whereas envy tends to focus on the person who has something we wish we had, avarice or greed focuses on the coveting of that good itself. It might come as a surprise, but it is indeed possible to be greedy of spiritual goods as well.

Whether is always seeking more spiritual advice, or the newest edition of a theological tome, or perhaps simply another icon to place in a room — spiritual avarice is an inordinate desire for spiritual goods and the seeking of spiritual consolation in these things rather than in God.

St. John of the Cross writes of those enraptured by spiritual avarice, “They weigh themselves down with over-decorated images and rosaries… they prefer one cross to another because of its elaborateness.”

I, for one, can see this sinful inclination in my own life and recognize how tempting it is because these prayerful and holy objects are in fact good and helpful. Having good books and holy items is of course good (and sometimes necessary) for growth in the spiritual life. The temperate possession and desire for these items are not being discouraged, rather, St. John is pointing out that we can make idols out of anything, even holy things.

St. John explains that “true devotion comes from the heart and looks only to the truth and substance represented by spiritual objects” and we must remind ourselves of this frequently. The goal is not more images and rosaries, the goal is God. We do not need more spiritual things, we need more of Him.

Wrath

Just as it is easy to lose our tempers and become angry in sensible ways, such as being cut off in traffic, or when someone makes a mistake that causes us trouble, it is possible to become angry in our spiritual lives.

St. John of the Cross points out two main ways this can happen. We can become angry with others when we see them sinning and falling short of spiritual perfection. St. John says these people are “setting themselves up as lords of virtue” and much opposed the virtue of meekness.

Another way that the deadly sin of anger can take root in the spiritual life is in anger with ourselves. St. John writes,

Others in becoming aware of their own imperfections grow angry with themselves in an unhumble impatience… They want to become saints in a day… They make numerous plans and great resolutions, but since they are not humble and have no distrust of themselves, the more resolves they make the more they break, and the greater becomes their anger. They do not have the patience to wait until God gives them what they need, when he so desires.

Like in the antidote to pride, we must ask the Lord to give us patience as we strive for perfection in his holy time. Our moral perfection is for Him and not for our own peace or satisfaction. Anger in the face of our imperfections only further distances us from the Lord.

Lust

Even those who have mastered the virtue of chastity can still suffer from temptations to lust and sins of the flesh. In fact, St. John of the Cross points out that, though surprising, lustful temptations can commonly appear during prayer and spiritual exercises.

The reason for this can perhaps be seen in the strong connection between the spiritual and the sensory. We often experience joy and consolation in our spiritual practices in a sensible and emotional way. For those who don’t have strong enough control over the sensible reactions in the spiritual life, there is a greater possibility of experiencing these lustful desires and temptations.

St. John also points out that this is a tactic of the devil, to lead people away from prayer: “To make them cowardly and afraid, he brings vividly to their minds foul and impure thoughts…the devil excites these feelings while souls are at prayer, instead of when they are engaged in other works so that they might abandon prayer.”

Of course, it is necessary to resist the devil and be persistent in our prayers, precisely in the face of these temptations. The Lord will continue to purify these desires and raise them up to the pure charity that is of him.

Gluttony

Gluttony involves the excessive desire and consumption of food and drink. In the spiritual life, there can also be an overemphasis on the feelings that come from our prayer to the extent that the feelings, and not God, become our focus. Spiritual gluttony is the excessive desire for spiritual feelings rather than God himself. It is possible that our spiritual readings, prayer, fasting, almsgiving, and ministry activity become more about making us feel good than being about the Lord and his will.

Of spiritual gluttons, St. John says, “Their only yearning and satisfaction is to do what they feel inclined to do… They think that gratifying and satisfying themselves is serving and satisfying God.”

It is very dangerous to assume that the pious and holy things we want for ourselves are the same things the Lord wants for us. Are we setting aside an hour of spiritual reading in the morning because the Lord is calling us to do it, or because it feels good to us and is easier than starting the work of the day? Are we fasting three times a week because we’ve discerned the Lord is asking these sacrifices of us or because we like the physical benefits of fasting?

The best and most effective prayers and devotions will always be the specific ones the Lord is inviting us to do. The danger of spiritual gluttony is a good reminder to constantly and consistently ask God to confirm our spiritual practices are in alignment with his will.

Sloth

Sloth is often equated with laziness but can be even better defined as sorrow in the face of good. Just as laziness can be extremely tempting and prevalent in our sensible lives so too in our spiritual lives. Spiritual sloth, or a deep sorrow in the face of spiritual goods, can become quite tempting as the Lord withholds some of the feelings and consolations in prayer that he might have previously given.

St. John explains,

Regarding spiritual sloth, those beginners usually become weary in exercises that are more spiritual and flee from them since these exercises are contrary to sensory satisfaction. Since they are so used to finding delight in spiritual practices, they become bored when they do not find it… They either give up prayer or go to it begrudgingly.

Like spiritual gluttony, spiritual sloth can stem from the desire for the feelings and consolation associated with prayer rather than for the Lord. This is precisely why God will at times remove these feelings and consolations, not as a punishment, but to purify our hearts and remind us why we are praying in the first place.

Again, we must ask the Lord to purify our hearts, for a deep purification is the only way to heal these spiritual deadly sins. When we recognize more aridity in our prayer, we must remind ourselves that this is when we are closer to God, we must embrace the dry wood of the cross that we are carrying, knowing the Lord is permitting this for our good.


Tuesday 30 May 2023

 

What did Saint Paul have to say about the Arsenokoitai? Quite a bit actually...


Romans 1:26-27

New International Version

26 Because of this, God gave them over to shameful lusts. Even their women exchanged natural sexual relations for unnatural ones. 27 In the same way the men also abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust for one another. Men committed shameful acts with other men, and received in themselves the due penalty for their error.

 

1 Corinthians 6:9-10.

New Revised Standard Version.

Do you not know that wrongdoers will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived! Fornicators, idolaters, adulterers, male prostitutes, sodomites, thieves, the greedy, drunkards, revilers, robbers—none of these will inherit the kingdom of God.

 

1 Timothy 1:8-11

...we know that the Law is good, if one uses it lawfully, understanding this, that the Law is not laid down for the just but for the lawless and disobedient, for the ungodly and sinners, for the unholy and profane, for those who strike their fathers and mothers, for murderers, the sexually immoral, men who practice homosexuality [arsenokoitai], enslavers, liars, perjurers, and whatever else is contrary to sound doctrine, in accordance with the gospel of the glory of the blessed God with which I have been entrusted.




 

Corporate America Has Launched A Religious War. It’s Time To Choose Your Side

BY: JOHN DANIEL DAVIDSON

MAY 26, 2023


In this war there are only two sides: the Tao and the Machine, God or Satan. You have to choose, but choose wisely.


Bud Light enlists a trans ladyface minstrel to sell beer. Target hires a trans Satanist to design LGBT clothes for kids and starts selling “binding” and “tucking” swimwear. North Face launches a marketing campaign featuring a creepy drag performer hocking LGBT gear to children ages 2 to 7. The Los Angeles Dodgers gives an award to a demonic hate group whose sole purpose is to blaspheme and profane the Catholic faith.

All this, and June “pride month” hasn’t even begun.

What’s happening? Why did so many major corporate brands decide to go all-in on promoting an aggressive, radical LGBT agenda that just a few years ago would have been considered totally unacceptable in civil society? Is this a psy-op? Is it real? What happens next?

The short answer to these questions is that we’ve entered a new phase of the culture war, and in some ways have transcended “the culture war” completely. What we’re in now is better described as a religious war — one that’s been launched by corporate America against all of us, and therefore demands we all choose sides.

Choosing sides in a religious war means you have to choose your religion. And in this particular religious war, there are only two sides. On one side is what C.S. Lewis called the Tao, which was his ecumenical shorthand for objective moral truth. “The Tao, which others may call Natural Law or Traditional Morality or the First Principles of Practical Reason or the First Platitudes, is not one among a series of possible systems of value,” Lewis wrote in The Abolition of Man. “It is the sole source of all value judgments. If it is rejected, all value is rejected. If any value is retained, it is retained.”

In America and in the West generally, the side of the Tao is the side of faithful Christians and Jews, as well as those atheists who, for practical reasons, cling to Judeo-Christian morality as the survivors of a shipwreck might cling to a lifeboat. It is the side that sees Target’s transing of kids as an intolerable moral evil, affirms the givenness of our nature and the created order, and recognizes not only that man isn’t God, but that man’s destiny is communion with God in a redeemed creation.

On the other side is what the writer Paul Kingsnorth, among others, has called the Machine, which at its root is a Nietzschean rebellion against God that turns out also to be “a rebellion against everything: roots, culture, community, families, biology itself.” Like the Tao, the religion of the Machine, of progress and technology and will to power, has a very long pedigree. It goes back to the Garden of Eden, where the serpent assured Eve, “You will not surely die,” that if she ate of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, she would become like God.

That was the first rebellion; we have been reenacting it ever since. It is perhaps easier to see in our own time how every rebellion against God, from the Garden to now, is also an attempt to overthrow Him, to become like God. Indeed, the desire to play God is the dark heart of both transgenderism and its close cousin, transhumanism. Like other evils of our age — abortion and euthanasia, to name the obvious ones — these are, at their roots, extremely candid manifestations of pride, the source of all sin.

The Machine is a religion that makes a claim over and against reality and the created order, which are denied and disfigured in man’s attempt to arrogate the power to recreate himself according to his own desires. In our day, he seeks to do so using new technologies, but that he would desire to do so is merely the latest iteration of the rebellion that began in the Garden. This is what J.R.R. Tolkien meant when he said “all stories are ultimately about the fall.” Tolkien also referred to the Machine at times when discussing his legendarium, often describing it as the urge to amass power and dominate, “bulldozing the real world, or coercing other wills” — a tyranny exercised over creation with the object of overcoming mortality. 

This is just what we see in the twin trans movements: a desire to overcome sex and a desire to overcome death. The transhumanists are as explicit about their desire to cheat death and attain godlike immortality as transgenders are about their desire to become the opposite sex. The latter appear to believe, like rebellious pagans of past ages, that children have an important role to play in the achievement of this desire. The Machine devoured children by fire on the altars of Moloch and Baal; it devours them now in the black mirrors of the internet and social media.

The temptation here is to dismiss this reading of our situation as hyperbole. Surely it isn’t as bad as all that, we want to say. But it really is. What’s happening now isn’t about corporate brands embracing “pride month,” as The New York Times recently framed it, or even about promoting tolerance in a diverse society. If Target were just selling T-shirts that said “fabulous” in rainbow letters no one would care. This is about transing kids. Everyone knows it, but no one wants to say so out loud. Corporations are the tip of the spear, pushing this stuff out and then letting the media turn around and accuse the right of being violent bigots for objecting.

We err, too, in thinking of all this as just a really bad case of “the culture war” that breaks along the familiar lines of left and right, blue and red. It’s partly that, but at its deepest level it’s a religious war, a spiritual struggle between light and darkness, good and evil, the Tao and the Machine.

All of which is to say that as this war develops, we should try not to get too caught up in how much Target stocks plummet or how low the price of Bud Light gets ($0, as of this writing). “Go woke, go broke” is — pardon the rhyme — a cope. That’s not to say we shouldn’t boycott these companies, even if it means financial hardship or inconvenience. Boycotting them is part of what we have to do in this religious war, but it’s not sufficient.

Corporate America is not going to stop, even if some corporations do go broke. What will be required of those who resist them is a deep religious commitment, a radical new way of living in the modern, digital age. If you’re a Jew, be deeply serious about your Judaism. If you’re a Christian, make the practice of your faith the central organizing fact of your life, not just something you do on Sundays. If you’re an atheist, pray that God gives you faith.

For adherents of the Tao, fighting this religious war is going to mean not just boycotting corporate brands but reorganizing your personal and professional life. It might mean quitting your job, or moving, or giving up certain things. It will require sacrifice. Perhaps great sacrifice.

And rest assured that every person in America is going to have to pick a side. If you don’t pick a side then your side will by default be that of the Machine, which dominates the heights of our post-Christian culture and economy. Whatever your opinion of transgenderism or identity politics, the Machine will suck you in and ensnare you unless you make a conscious choice to stand against it. So choose, and choose wisely. Your country — and, more importantly, your soul — depends on it.


 

 

GAY EX-ANGLICAN CLERIC TO BE CATHOLIC PRIEST

NEWS: WORLD NEWS

Allen Hall admits former openly homosexual, Church of England minister


WESTMINSTER, England (ChurchMilitant.com) - England's top cardinal is authorizing an openly homosexual former Anglican priest to be trained for the Catholic priesthood in his archdiocese despite Vatican directives cautioning against ordaining homosexuals to the priesthood.  

Image
David Cherry at the Westminster University LGBT event 

Cardinal Vincent Nichols, archbishop of Westminster and president of the Catholic Bishops' Conference of England and Wales (CBCEW) has endorsed the admission of David Cherry for priestly formation at Allen Hall Seminary, London. 

"I started formation in Allen Hall last September, two years after being received into the Catholic Church," Cherry wrote in the 2021 Easter edition of the seminary's newsletter.

Cherry said he "found the courage to take this great leap of faith" through his "involvement in Ignatian spirituality and discernment" and "with the patience and love of friends."

In September 2018, Cherry was received into full communion with the Catholic Church in the Parish of the Most Precious Blood — an Anglican ordinariate parish in the archdiocese of Southwark.

Sources at Allen Hall told Church Militant that Cherry no longer has a homosexual partner.

Cherry's Gay Pride

Seminarians stumbled on Cherry's involvement in gay activism on the internet when they found a flyer advertising "LGBT History Month" at the University of Westminster. 

It is a terrible thing to grow up with a secret that who you are must be kept a secret and must stay hidden.GabTweet

Cherry was billed as a "gay Anglican minister" on a panel discussion titled "How Faith and Sexuality Can go Hand in Hand," along with Stonewall policy advisor Alice Ashworth and other homosexuals from different religious backgrounds.  

Cherry said at the event:

It is a terrible thing not to be known and to have to keep a secret … It is a terrible thing to grow up with a secret that who you are must be kept a secret and must stay hidden; that some vital aspect of yourself must not be spoken of.

Some of you and especially some of us older people would have experienced what that was like, and now times are changing, and I'm sure, they need to change some more.

We become who we are by being seen and by having the freedom to express who we are. And this I take in Christian theological terms to be of the nature of God.  

The ex-Anglican cleric, originally from South Africa, spent over 25 years pastoring five parishes including St. Mary's Bourne Street — one of the most famous churches in the Anglo-Catholic tradition, and St. Barnabas Pimlico near Sloane Square, London. 

Cherry was also lead chaplain to Westminster University and coordinating chaplain to Greenwich University — where he was known by staff and students to be openly gay. 

Cardinal's Defense

Church Militant contacted Cdl. Nichols to ask if Cherry had publicly repented and changed his position on homosexuality both in lifestyle and theology. 

Is Cherry in "full agreement with the Catechism of the Catholic Church on human sexuality and willing to preach it and condemn the sin of homogenital practice publicly, including from the pulpit?" Church Militant queried. 

And during the controversies over the notorious Soho Masses, Cdl. Nichols' statements never once mentioned the necessity of chastity.GabTweet

Cardinal Nichols' officer responded: 

All those accepted for formation for the priesthood in the diocese of Westminster undergo a lengthy and thorough selection process. This process requires, on the part of all applicants, complete transparency, commitment to ongoing conversion of life as well as adherence to the Church's teaching on faith and morals. 

Candidates will have been expected to live the Church's teaching for a period of time. Once admitted to seminary, their capacity to live fruitfully the life that will be demanded of them as Catholic priests is constantly and carefully discerned by various means throughout their spiritual, human, pastoral and intellectual formation. 

Prior to admittance to Holy Orders all candidates make their profession of faith and take the Oath of Fidelity. These are a public witness to the candidates' firm acceptance of and readiness to "hold each and everything definitively proposed by the Church regarding teaching on faith and morals."

Image
Nichols ordains Alexander Balzanella at Westminster Cathedral

Church Militant also wrote to Cherry and to Allen Hall rector Canon John O'Leary but received no response. 

Ex-Gay? Dubious, Says Deacon

Speaking to Church Militant, popular British writer and deacon Nick Donnelly said he doesn't "discount the possibility of personal conversion, but there are reasons to doubt that Westminster archdiocese would insist strongly on candidates to the seminary upholding the Church's teaching on homosexuality." 

Donnelly elaborated: 

For example, Martin Pendergast and Terence Weldon, who are openly homosexual, admit that when they negotiated with Westminster archdiocese to establish the pro-LGBT Soho Masses, Bp. Longley — on behalf of Cdl. Cormac Murphy-O'Connor — at no time expressed any demand that they "remain celibate or agree with Church teaching." 

And during the controversies over the notorious Soho Masses, Cdl. Nichols' statements never once mentioned the necessity of chastity. This calls into question the reassurance of the Westminster archdiocese that all seminary candidates are required, in any meaningful way, to uphold the teachings of the Church on this matter.

In July, Bp. Marcus Stock ordained Christopher William Butler in Leeds Cathedral. Butler earlier bragged on social media about his same-sex civil partnership. 

One must in no way overlook the negative consequences that can derive from the ordination of persons with deep-seated homosexual tendencies.GabTweet

Church Militant reported in January 2020 that Butler and his former homosexual civil partner Alan Sumner had entered into a registered same-sex civil partnership before same-sex "marriage" was legalized in Britain.

Earlier in September 2020, Cdl. Nichols ordained Fr. Alexander Balzanella in Westminster Cathedral despite complaints that the ordinand had supported sodomy on social media — including Pride marches, queer events, gay nightclubs and same-sex "marriage."

Image
Fr. Christopher William Butler (right)

In June, Cdl. Nichols pulled Fr. Philip Dyer-Perry's appointment as pastoral director of Allen Hall after Church Militant exposed the priest's pro-abortion and pro-LGBT positions. 

Church Teaching

In 2005, Pope Benedict XVI approved the Instruction Concerning the Criteria for the Discernment of Vocations with regard to Persons with Homosexual Tendencies in view of their Admission to the Seminary and to Holy Orders. It addresses "whether to admit to the seminary and to Holy Orders candidates who have deep-seated homosexual tendencies."

The directive said it was "necessary to state clearly that the Church, while profoundly respecting the persons in question, cannot admit to the seminary or to Holy Orders those who practice homosexuality, present deep-seated homosexual tendencies or support the so-called gay culture."

"One must in no way overlook the negative consequences that can derive from the ordination of persons with deep-seated homosexual tendencies," it added.

It clarified that "homosexual tendencies that were only the expression of a transitory problem — for example, that of an adolescence not yet su