Sunday 5 June 2022

 

The Whitsun Weddings

That Whitsun, I was late getting away:
    Not till about
One-twenty on the sunlit Saturday
Did my three-quarters-empty train pull out,
All windows down, all cushions hot, all sense   
Of being in a hurry gone. We ran
Behind the backs of houses, crossed a street
Of blinding windscreens, smelt the fish-dock; thence   
The river’s level drifting breadth began,
Where sky and Lincolnshire and water meet.

All afternoon, through the tall heat that slept   
    For miles inland,
A slow and stopping curve southwards we kept.   
Wide farms went by, short-shadowed cattle, and   
Canals with floatings of industrial froth;   
A hothouse flashed uniquely: hedges dipped   
And rose: and now and then a smell of grass   
Displaced the reek of buttoned carriage-cloth   
Until the next town, new and nondescript,   
Approached with acres of dismantled cars.

At first, I didn’t notice what a noise
    The weddings made
Each station that we stopped at: sun destroys   
The interest of what’s happening in the shade,
And down the long cool platforms whoops and skirls   
I took for porters larking with the mails,   
And went on reading. Once we started, though,   
We passed them, grinning and pomaded, girls   
In parodies of fashion, heels and veils,   
All posed irresolutely, watching us go,

As if out on the end of an event
    Waving goodbye
To something that survived it. Struck, I leant   
More promptly out next time, more curiously,   
And saw it all again in different terms:   
The fathers with broad belts under their suits   
And seamy foreheads; mothers loud and fat;   
An uncle shouting smut; and then the perms,   
The nylon gloves and jewellery-substitutes,   
The lemons, mauves, and olive-ochres that

Marked off the girls unreally from the rest.   
    Yes, from cafés
And banquet-halls up yards, and bunting-dressed   
Coach-party annexes, the wedding-days   
Were coming to an end. All down the line
Fresh couples climbed aboard: the rest stood round;
The last confetti and advice were thrown,
And, as we moved, each face seemed to define   
Just what it saw departing: children frowned   
At something dull; fathers had never known

Success so huge and wholly farcical;
    The women shared
The secret like a happy funeral;
While girls, gripping their handbags tighter, stared   
At a religious wounding. Free at last,
And loaded with the sum of all they saw,
We hurried towards London, shuffling gouts of steam.   
Now fields were building-plots, and poplars cast   
Long shadows over major roads, and for
Some fifty minutes, that in time would seem

Just long enough to settle hats and say
    I nearly died,
A dozen marriages got under way.
They watched the landscape, sitting side by side
—An Odeon went past, a cooling tower,   
And someone running up to bowl—and none   
Thought of the others they would never meet   
Or how their lives would all contain this hour.   
I thought of London spread out in the sun,   
Its postal districts packed like squares of wheat:

There we were aimed. And as we raced across   
    Bright knots of rail
Past standing Pullmans, walls of blackened moss   
Came close, and it was nearly done, this frail   
Travelling coincidence; and what it held   
Stood ready to be loosed with all the power   
That being changed can give. We slowed again,
And as the tightened brakes took hold, there swelled
A sense of falling, like an arrow-shower   
Sent out of sight, somewhere becoming rain.

3 comments:

  1. Anonymous4 June 2022 at 12:43
    BUT NEVER MIND ALL THAT, GENE, WE HAVE BUSINESS TO TRANSACT...

    Gene, you need to look up the word negotiation and see what it actually means - it means two people of equal standing solving a problem between them to their mutual benefit, neither of which criteria apply to us.

    We do not enjoy equal standing: thanks to the your nastiness and malice, the perverted filth and the dirty minded nonsense you have published about me and mine over the years, I am in a position to ruin your standing among the Catholic community of Uxbridge and the Westminster Diocese, and I will not hesitate to do so.

    You have no such power with regard to me, and hence you are in no position to negotiate, hence the bluster, and this nonsensical business about "Mary Winterbourne" - don't insult my intelligence.

    You wish to benefit by continuing your blog, and I am prepared to allow this if you fulfil the conditions below to the letter during a time scale to be mutually agreed - I suggest Midsummer's Day:

    [1] that all references of any kind on this blog to my wife, my son, any members of my family and myself are removed forthwith - this includes all such references made at any time in the last eleven years.

    [2] that all references to TES Opinion, my role on TES Opinion and "the clique" on this blog are removed forthwith - this includes all such references made at any time in the last eleven years.

    [3] that no references of any kind, overt or covert, to the subjects listed at [1] and [2] above are made on this blog ever again. The term "references" must include written posts or pictures - photographs, cartoons, paintings, drawing - which purport to portray my wife, my son, my family and myself.

    Finally, you will post a withdrawal of the accusation that "Myrtle Thornberry" committed suicide after being persecuted by "The Clique", and make an unconditional apology for having both made, and persisted in, that accusation.

    For my part I undertake never to post on your blog ever again unless you breach any of the conditions outlined at [1], [2] and [3] above.

    Those are my terms for a truce, and they are not negotiable.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Detterling I am probably speaking out of turn as I have not yet discussed this with Gene. Would it be possible that this matter could be resolved without negotiations if Gene was to agree that for a period of six months he does not mention on his blog you, Delia, Sebastian or your gay nephew?

    Kind regards,

    Mary Winterbourne

    ReplyDelete
  3. Gene, every time you post as "Mary Winterbourne" you harden my resolve finally to end this demented nonsense with no warning. You don't seem to realise that I am actually cutting you some slack by offering you terms on which your blog can continue. If this ridiculous "Mary Winterbourne" charade extends to ONE MORE POST then I shall write to Fr Nicholas Schofield without. My approach will be that one of his parishioners, or at least one of prominent Catholics in his area is exhibiting symptoms of a serious pyschosis, and that it is his priestly duty to come to your aid as soon as possible. No priest could ignore such a warning or even see it as malicious, given that the evidence I shall furnish him will document the progression of your fugue.

    Gene, I am getting mightily pissed off with your puerile and intelligence-insulting attempts to delay the inevitable, and the moment will soon come when I stop attempting to give you a chance to get off the hook and simply go for your jugular.

    In the meantime I am prepared to alter NOT ONE SYLLABLE of the terms on which I am prepared to agree to a truce: once again, Gene.

    You have until Midsummer's Day to comply.

    Gene, you need to look up the word negotiation and see what it actually means - it means two people of equal standing solving a problem between them to their mutual benefit, neither of which criteria apply to us.

    We do not enjoy equal standing: thanks to the your nastiness and malice, the perverted filth and the dirty minded nonsense you have published about me and mine over the years, I am in a position to ruin your standing among the Catholic community of Uxbridge and the Westminster Diocese, and I will not hesitate to do so.

    You have no such power with regard to me, and hence you are in no position to negotiate, hence the bluster, and this nonsensical business about "Mary Winterbourne" - don't insult my intelligence.

    You wish to benefit by continuing your blog, and I am prepared to allow this if you fulfil the conditions below to the letter during a time scale to be mutually agreed - I suggest Midsummer's Day:

    [1] that all references of any kind on this blog to my wife, my son, any members of my family and myself are removed forthwith - this includes all such references made at any time in the last eleven years.

    [2] that all references to TES Opinion, my role on TES Opinion and "the clique" on this blog are removed forthwith - this includes all such references made at any time in the last eleven years.

    [3] that no references of any kind, overt or covert, to the subjects listed at [1] and [2] above are made on this blog ever again. The term "references" must include written posts or pictures - photographs, cartoons, paintings, drawing - which purport to portray my wife, my son, my family and myself.

    Finally, you will post a withdrawal of the accusation that "Myrtle Thornberry" committed suicide after being persecuted by "The Clique", and make an unconditional apology for having both made, and persisted in, that accusation.

    For my part I undertake never to post on your blog ever again unless you breach any of the conditions outlined at [1], [2] and [3] above.

    Those are my terms for a truce, and they are not negotiable.

    ReplyDelete