Thursday, 27 March 2025

 PROOF THAT GOD EXISTS...


GOD


I have a friend, an elderly lady now, who many years ago one night as she was getting into bed distinctly heard a voice say, "Go down to the public toilets and meditate."

I once lost my phone charger. I got in a bit of a panic. Then the forceful thought came into my head, 'Check the bottom drawer in the white wardrobe in Marianne's bedroom'. I did and lo and behold there was my phone charger.

Some time back I dreamt one night about venison. The next morning I had to visit a friend in ITU in Harefield Hospital. I decided to have lunch in the hospital canteen. On the menu would you believe it was venison pie!


These occurrences leave no doubt in my mind that God exists.


GENE



9 comments:

  1. Question: was Gene 'Gary' Vincent pissed when he wrote the above?
    Answer: very probably; it was past midday GMT when he posted it, so he was probably well into his second bottle of Aldi Chianti Equinadefraticus by then.
    Question: all the same, he usually makes a bit more sense than this, even when he's pissed. Are you sure he hasn't finally gone off his rocker?
    Answer: again, very probably: no-one with their head on straight would imagine that God has time to send old maiden ladies cottaging in the middle of the night, even wearing their comfortable shoes [Gene's fictional Uncle Nancy we might believe], or look for lost phone chargers, or check the menus in fictional hospital canteens. Barmy, or what?
    Question: so Gene 'Gary' Vincent really does think that the drivelling and pointless anecdotage above actually does confirm the existence of God?
    Answer: again, very probably: but you have to remember that Gene doesn't just look like a fake, sound like a fake and behave like a fake: he IS a fake, all the way through: fake Christian, fake Catholic, fake teacher, fake writer, fake husband and parent. Which means that he is stupid enough to believe any thing. What else do you want to know?
    Question: Who campaigned against the P.I.E.?
    Answer: Gene 'Gary' Vincent did - or at least he says he did, but we have to remember he is an inveterate liar, and getting off his arse and actually doing something [as opposed to lying about doing stuff on here] is not what he is famous for.
    Question: Who did not campaign against the P.I.E.?
    Answer: Detterling did not, although only a nasty-minded and outrageously stupid person would claim that this meant he had any time for it.
    Question: and what difference did Gene 'Gary' Vincent's claimed demonstrating against the P. I. E. make to the price of fish?
    Answer: Bugger all.
    Question: On the other hand, who, while claiming to have campaigned against the P.I.E. may have given away more than he meant to about himself when he perved on his own blog over a photograph of a young girl only 11 years old who was wearing a skimpy bikini?
    Answer: Gary “Glitter” Vincent, writing in that instance as Gary Bandall, one of Gary "Glitter" Vincent's sweaty and rancid drawerful of sock puppets.
    Question: Is there any way Gary "Glitter" Vincent can wriggle out of that catastrophic revelation?
    Answer: not so long as I have my strength, he won't.

    ReplyDelete
  2. "a photograph of a young girl only 11 years old who was wearing a skimpy bikini?"

    No such photograph ever appeared on my blog.

    GENE

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You really think that you can get away with this Gene? Still pissed and off your head, I assume.

      On your purported letter from my nephew about your ridiculous "olive branch", you printed a photograph you claimed to be of my grand-daughters. When I later posted the reactions of my actual grand-daughters [aged 20 and 17], you claimed that I was lying, and that my grand-daughters are actually aged 17 and 11. It follows therefore you claimed that the younger of the two girls on that picture was my 11 year grand-daughter in a bikini.

      This was the picture that you, in your Gary Bandall identity perved over, describing a pre-pubertal eleven year old as a "corker".

      If that is not paedophilia, then what is it?

      Well, we'll see what Fr Nicholas and Angela Atkins make of it, shall we?

      Delete
  3. Methinks the only pervert here is you Detterling. As Gene says, no such photograph has ever appeared on his blog.

    Tony of the Big Saloon

    ReplyDelete
  4. You are accusing me of being a sexual pervert, Gene.

    And outstandingly silly thing to do for a man in your position.

    You will regret it.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Detterling you should be ashamed inventing perverted lies. There is no such photograph.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. On your purported letter from my nephew about your ridiculous "olive branch", you printed a photograph you claimed to be of my grand-daughters. When I later posted the reactions of my actual grand-daughters [aged 20 and 17], you claimed that I was lying, and that my grand-daughters are actually aged 17 and 11. It follows therefore you claimed that the younger of the two girls on that picture was my 11 year grand-daughter in a bikini.

      This was the picture that you, in your Gary Bandall identity perved over, describing a pre-pubertal eleven year old as a "corker".

      If that is not paedophilia, then what is it?

      Well, we'll see what Fr Nicholas and Angela Atkins make of it, shall we?

      Delete
  6. "Well, we'll see what Fr Nicholas and Angela Atkins make of it, shall we?"

    Words cannot express my contempt for a man who would threaten this. You do know that by this you would ruin Gene's life and the life of his family? Such malice.

    Has Gene ever threatened to expose you? Never. Why can't you fight your own battles you yellow-bellied bottlejob?

    Mary Winterbourne

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. A stop whingeing, you preposterous little shit. You have had DOZENS of chances to stop writing filth, nastiness and lies about me and mine. But no, the rules don't apply to Gene "Gary Glitter" Vincent, fake writer, fake teacher, fake Christian, fake Catholic, fake husband, fake father.

      So you are going to be taught the rules the hard way - you have asked for it, Gary, and very much I hope you enjoy it.

      All you have to do is to promise - and to keep that promise - never to refer to my family again on your blog and you can be off the hook - provided that you keep the promise indefinitely. You can write what you like about me, Gary, your puny invective bounces off; but I WILL NOT HAVE you soil my beloved wife, son, children and grandchildren subject to what amounts to sexual abuse in every sense of that phrase.

      A simple choice, Gene, and you had better stop whingeing and make the right choice NOW. I am leaving home next Tuesday for an indefinite period [where and why is none of your business] and if I have your promise by then, I will suspend all action in the matter of your exposure.

      If not, then not.

      And if you make that promise and break it whilst I am still alive, then you will wish you were dead - no mercy, and no notice, either.

      Piss or get off the pot, Gary.

      Delete