Thursday, 16 April 2026

 

Trump Posts New Jesus Image

President Donald Trump posted an image of Jesus embracing him on his Truth Social account Wednesday, just days after widespread backlash over a similar image

From The Independent:

President Donald Trump has posted an image of Jesus embracing him to his Truth Social account just days after widespread backlash over an image he shared depicting himself as the Messiah. The new image, which appears to be AI-generated and was originally posted on X by a Trump supporter, depicts Jesus with an arm around the president’s shoulder and one hand on his chest in front of a halo of light and an American flag. Their heads are leaning against each other and both have their eyes closed.

Trump posted the picture Wednesday morning with the message: “The Radical Left Lunatics might not like this, but I think it is quite nice!!! President DJT.”

[For Full Story]

15 comments:

  1. YOU WILL ALWAYS FIND GENE "GROPER" VINCENT ON THE MORAL HIGH GROUND...IT'S THE BEST VANTAGE POINT FOR LOOKING DOWN WOMEN'S CLEAVAGES.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I have warned what would happen if you continue to associate the word 'groper' with my name. Fasten your seatbelt you bastard. You are in for a bumpy ride.

    GENE

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No one is associating the word “Groper” with your name, Groper.

      This is because Gene Vincent isn’t your name, is it? And they believed you at school before when you denied authorship of this blog, didn’t they? And there’s no reason to think you won’t get away with it again, is there?

      So what remains of your good name, Groper, remains and will remain intact.

      Besides, as you pointed out once before - perhaps when you boasted about buggering Detterling’s wife, or that Detterling supported the Nazi practice of murdering the physically and mentally handicapped, or maybe when you claimed that Detterling hated homosexuals, one of those - anyway you said that neither you nor Detterling actually existed except on the internet, so that there could be no harm at all in exchanging robust language in a good humoured spirit of to and fro.

      But of course all that no longer applies when you are on the receiving end of what you dish out with such relish, and with no thought at all for the pain inflicted by your rancid malice and grubby nastiness. Those who dish it out need to learn to take it, don’t they, Groper?

      Delete
    2. Ps: there is a way to make this stop, Groper. I may get around to telling you what it is soon.

      Or not.

      Delete
  3. Pull the other one, Groper. It’s got bells on.

    ReplyDelete
  4. "when you boasted about buggering Detterling’s wife"

    Never happened.

    And on that subject you should concern yourself with matters closer to home: your nephew Cuthbert being sodomised every night by his live-in partner Julian.

    GENE

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Of course it didn’t, Groper, you stupid bugger. Are you really so thick as not to see that Detterling is simply dishing out to you some of the nasty, lying and vicious insults you have been assaulting him for twenty years. You will be accused of buggering Detterling’s wife for as long as it rattles your cage, Grope, you pathetic cretin.

      You did bigger Detterling’s wife, and the Good Yarn collective of drunks did congratulate you on having ficked her, and that’s a fact. It takes a mind as twisted as it is vile to boast of having fucked someone else’s wife but draw the line at the accusation of having buggered her, wouldn’t you say, Groper?

      Let all that alone, you have published several admissions of and justifications for your serial groping of defenceless young women during your teaching career and you may be sure, Groper, that that story will run and run and run…

      How frustrating it must be that the only person you can grope now is yourself…once a groper always a groper, eh, Groper?

      Delete
    2. And what about your nephew Cuthbert? Yes, I know. Too dreadful to contemplate such depravity.

      GENE

      Delete
  5. Groper, the sexual habits and practices of Detterling’s relations are their business and no one else’s, provided that they are legal and consensual - and they are. There is no argument to be had there so far as Detterling is concerned. On the other hand, Groper, your obsession with anal sexual intercourse probably expresses some unfulfilled subliminal sexual desires that in the past found partial expression in your groping of young women’s bottoms.

    You know this perfectly well, Groper, and the only reason for your bringing the matter up is in a feeble attempt to distract attention from your long and deplorable track record as a serial groper of defenceless young women in empty classrooms and deserted corridors.

    And drawing attention to the practice of anal sexual intercourse, Groper, merely reminds everyone of the occasion when you boasted about buggering Detterling’s wife. Do you think that’s wise, Groper?

    ReplyDelete
  6. That's it. You have asked for it. I will not be falsely labelled a groper.

    You'll be hearing from me Detterling. Watch this space.

    GENE

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You are not being falsely labelled a groper, Groper. You are being accurately labelled a groper, Groper. You have boasted of having fondled the bottoms of young women, and to embracing them without their consent, both actions, by your own telling, being motivated sexually. That’s a textbook definition of groping.

      Would you like the proof of the above to be posted? Nothing easier…

      There is, however something you can do to make it stop.

      Would you like to know what it is?

      Delete
  7. Oh no. Groper!! Not Swashbuckling Mulligan and another ordeal by laboured piffle and badly written horseshit, Groper. Spare us, Groper, please.

    ReplyDelete
  8. "Not Swashbuckling Mulligan and another ordeal..."

    Well, I can understand your pleading for mercy. You are quaking in your boots. Swashbuckling Mulligan is formidable - your bete noir.

    GENE

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Groper - can you possibly be this colossally stupid? or has being outed as a serial groper finally un-hinged you?

      "Pleading for mercy" my arse, Groper: "quaking in your boots" - what the actual fuck, Groper?

      Groper, your sock-puppet Swashbuckling Mulligan's writing is as formidable as the skin on cold custard.

      Your last effort in nomen Swashbuckling Mulligan, Groper, the preposterous garbage about Detterling dying of shock at finding out that his son is gay [as if Detterling would care two straws if he is], was painfully and relentlessly terrible, the literary equivalent of finger-painting. It made Detterling laugh so hard that he had a nose bleed.

      Mistaking

      "Not Swashbuckling Mulligan and another ordeal by laboured piffle and badly written horseshit, Groper. Spare us, Groper, please"

      as a plea for mercy is the riposte of a man as bankrupt of ideas as he is of talent.

      Stick to groping, Groper, it's what you do best.

      Delete
  9. Creeping Jesus, arse-crawling soft soaper,
    pretentious and giftless no hoper;
    unrefined, indiscrimate toper:
    meet Gene Vincent, the Hillingdon Groper.

    ReplyDelete