I DON'T KNOW IF YOU HAVE SEEN THIS SIR HENRY...
Detterling is now claiming that that it is he who is faking your comments on here.
I think he is quaking in his open-toed sandals about more archive material being posted by you.
Excellent.
The more tendentious shite you can dredge up from the past, the better, so far as I am concerned. You seem to think that you have some kind of advantage over me - by all means go on thinking that.
"Should Mr Detterling forget his place" - you do realise, I hope, what a precise image of pompous self-regard this projects?
I didn't think that Gene would fall for this one, but he has. I always said that he was as thick as he was nasty.
'I didn't think that Gene would fall for this one, but he has. I always said that he was as thick as he was nasty.'
And what exactly has Gene fallen for? Not for the first time you are being incoherent Detterling.- Anonymous14 February 2022 at 01:49
"And what exactly has Gene fallen for?"
Do you SERIOUSLY imagine that I am going to tell you? let us just say that for the past ten years Gene has fallen, every time, for all the hoaxes I have pulled on him, including the one that kept this gruesome blog off the air for a year and a half. And this one is proving to be no different.
As for you, I commend to you the answer given by H H Asquith to a series of parliamentary questions on Monday 4th April 1910. The Sir Henry pose will get caught up in it, but I can live with that. I just hope you can.
Good afternoon Mr Vincent. The more I read from Mr Anonymous, the more troubled I feel. I have read through the entire blog (and am certain that more comments were present when I last looked, (a good 6 years ago). Nevertheless, the vehemence of his comments on this blog, and that along with his self-evident addiction to you is most unsettling.
ReplyDeleteIt is, nevertheless, a pattern that I have noticed going back 17 years; a pattern of repeat name-calling, goading and a corrosive dependency maintaining this dialogue with you, and the burning desire for one-upmanship.
Perhaps it is better we steer the conversation to other matters. What do you think?
"Detterling is now claiming that that it is he who is faking your comments on here."
ReplyDeleteAs I said, Gene, thick as well as nasty. You have edited the comments you posted as Sir Henry so that they now appear to come from you. Did you seriously imagine that I wouldn't notice?
Not only thick and nasty but dazzlingly incompetent. You often tried to conduct conversations between two identities in the old days on TES and invariably you ballsed it up because you can't even construct a convincing deceit.
So you have now gone back to claiming that it is me who posts as Sir H.
ReplyDeleteDETTERLING IT IS ALL GETTING TO MUCH FOR YOU.
NURSE! TIME FOR DETTERLING'S MEDICATION.
So you have now gone back to claiming that it is me who posts as Sir H.
ReplyDeleteDETTERLING IT IS ALL GETTING TOO MUCH FOR YOU.
NURSE! TIME FOR DETTERLING'S MEDICATION.
Tedious and incompetent. Gene, you are pathetic.
ReplyDeleteTime to apply the coup de grace I think.