Wednesday, 23 February 2022

 


Detterling on this blessed Feast Day of Saint Polycarp I offer you the following olive branch: I hereby offer to remove from this blog all posts relating to Myrtle Thornberry R.I.P. on the condition that you post on here a full and unequivocal apology for all the hurt caused to so many by The Clique.

I can't be fairer tan that.

Let's put all animosity behind us. I wish to get back to the good old days of 2005 and all that banter and badinage and rip-roaring, rollicking good fun.


GENE

27 comments:

  1. I wouldn't expect anything amounting for an apology from anyone on the Woke Left, Mr Vincent. I suspect that Mr Anonymous has crawled off back to Miss Strange's private members' club.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Gene, your narcissism and psychosis deepen by the day.

    You offer to remove all references on your blog to a filthy and scurrilous lie about a non-existent suicide in exchange for an apology for imaginary pain inflicted by a clique which existed only in the deranged minds of yourself and the egregious Rawlinson, respectively the Alan Partridge and the Christine Hamilton of the internet. I reject your offer and you with contempt. And in any case, removing all the references to "Myrtle Thornberry" will make no difference in the long run. All the evidence is preserved in screen shots, and when I get around to contacting the West Sussex Coroners' Office [which I will do once my lengthy to do list becomes more manageable] that will more than suffice to disprove your libellous filth.

    You are demented, Gene, and the sooner you seek help the better. With Lent coming up you should probably knock off the drink for a start. Two bottles of Aldi claret a day is not a good habit to maintain.

    And Rawlinson, yes I am of the Left but despise the woke posture as much as I despise your flimsy and incompetent Colonel Blimp impersonation and shallow sneering.

    And if I have joined the Staffroom forum, just what makes you it's anyone's business but mine? One of the refreshing things about it is the absence of people sneering at "dainty boys wearing open-toed sandals", "simpering Nancy Boys", or starting viciously unpleasant threads about same sex couples adopting chilren or getting married, the kind of nasty, dirty-minded scoffing with which you and Vincent stank the place out so thoroughly and so often on TES Opinion.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. What username are you using on Staffroom Detters?

      Don't be surprised if Gene turns up on that forum.

      Delete
    2. You don't read very well, do you Gene?

      "And if I have joined the Staffroom forum, just what makes you it's anyone's business but mine?"

      Think it through.

      Delete
    3. I didn't say it was anyone's business but your own.
      I asked what your username on this Staffroom was. Plus, I gave notice that you can expect Gene to appear on this forum soon.

      That news will have the Woke brigade quaking in their boots.

      Delete
    4. Still as thick as mince, Gene. I haven't said that I have joined the Staffroom forum - the operative word is IF, you stupid bugger.

      And still as narcissistic as ever, Gene. Your accessing the Staffroom forum will be greeted with indifference, because you are a meaningless little man.


      Delete
    5. "And still as narcissistic as ever, Gene. Your accessing the Staffroom forum will be greeted with indifference, because you are a meaningless little man."

      Feeble words from the new Woke clique forum fuhrer.

      Delete
    6. Gene is deleting my replies to your comments, Rawlinson. Why is that? Is he against free speech? Does he believe in cancel culture? Is he a hypocrite as well as a coward.
      Of course the answer to all three of these questions is "yes".

      Delete
    7. If he is, Mr Anonymous, the answer to your question is that this is his platform, over which he is free to exercise control, just as the moderators on any open forums can do. You are quite free to walk to Speakers Corner in order to avoid this difficulty. Alternatively, you are free to add comments on Sir Henry at Horringer Court. Kindest regards, Sir Henry.

      Delete
    8. I used to think that you had a spark of decency in you. If you can support an unscrupulous shit like Gene Vincent then clearly you haven't. Let me ask you this:

      Was there such a person as Myrtle Thornberry?

      Did she commit suicide?

      And if so, was this as a result of anything that was said to her on TES Opinion?

      Amd if so, what proof can you offer to the answers to any or all of these questions?

      No, I thought not.

      Delete
    9. Anonymous25 February 2022 at 12:50
      "Gene is deleting my replies to your comments, Rawlinson. Why is that? Is he against free speech? Does he believe in cancel culture? Is he a hypocrite as well as a coward."

      NO! Gene is not deleting replies. You are a bare-faced liar Detterling.

      Delete
    10. And that, I think, is the truth of the matter. Well said Mr. Vincent.

      Delete
    11. Never mind that,Rawlinson: how about direct Yes/No responses to these questions?

      Was there such a person as Myrtle Thornberry?

      Did she commit suicide?

      And was this alleged suicide a result of anything that was said to her on TES Opinion?

      And if it was, do you have documentary evidence - either from the TES forum or outwith it, for what was said?

      No, thought not.

      Delete
  3. I do believe that Mr Anonymous is wearing sparking clogs this evening.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Gene, you deleted two of my posts yesterday, Friday 25th February, and one the day before. Standard Gene Vincent hypocrisy compounded by standard Gene Vincent deceit. Gene Vincent's family motto: Fallo et amitto.

    Now: date, time and verdict of the "Myrtle Thornberry" inquest please.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. When you can learn to answer questions I put to you more than 2 weeks ago Mr Anonymous, I might consider returning the favour. Good afternoon.

      Delete
    2. "Gene, you deleted two of my posts yesterday, Friday 25th February."

      YOU LYING SO-AND-SO DETTERLING.

      Delete
    3. "When you can learn to answer questions I put to you more than 2 weeks ago Mr Anonymous, I might consider returning the favour. Good afternoon."

      That's inept footwork, even for a drunken old sod like you. You are as bogus as a seven pound note.

      "YOU LYING SO-AND-SO DETTERLING."

      YOU accuse ME of lying? when you invent filth about buggering my wife? fathering my son? shagging my wife who is "a gorgeous bit of stuff"? about leading a clique on TES Opinion? about causing someone to commit suicide?

      You impertinent sod.

      And you do realise that you admitted to deleting one on February 24th?!! Fallo et amitto.

      Now: date, time and verdict of the Myrtle Thornberry inquest, please.

      Delete
    4. Take some Eno salts and relax that bile of yours Mr.Anonymous. There's a good fellow.

      Delete
    5. It is genuinely painful to realise that you have lived so long and learned so little about yourself. You don't so much strike an attitude as waft a limp wrist at it.

      Delete
  5. And you do realise that you admitted to deleting one on February 24th?!! Fallo et amitto

    I admit nothing of the sort. This is where you really show your self as the liar you are.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. YOU accuse ME of lying? when you invent filth about buggering my wife? fathering my son? shagging my wife who is "a gorgeous bit of stuff"? about leading a clique on TES Opinion? about causing someone to commit suicide?

      You impertinent sod.

      And you do realise that you admitted to deleting one on February 24th?!! Fallo et amitto.

      Now: date, place and verdict of the Myrtle Thornberry inquest, please.

      Delete
  6. Replies
    1. Do me a favour, you silly old fart.

      Tomorrow morning, get out of bed, remove your nightshirt, squat with your knees spread, bend your head forward and kiss your arse goodbye.

      It'll make a change from kissing Gene Vincent's arse at least.

      Delete
  7. "Now: date, time and verdict of the Myrtle Thornberry inquest, please."

    You already have been given that information.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No I haven't - not least because it doesn't exist.

      Nonetheless I shall continue to plague you with this entirely reasonable request, given that you have in effect accused me of manslaughter if not murder.

      DATE, PLACE AND VERDICT OF THE "MYRTLE THORNBERRY" INQUEST, PLEASE.

      Delete
  8. FAO RAWLINSON OF BELLEND:

    DETTERLING WROTE:
    Rawlinson: how about direct Yes/No responses to these questions?

    Was there such a person as Myrtle Thornberry?
    Did she commit suicide?
    And was this alleged suicide a result of anything that was said to her on TES Opinion?
    And if it was, do you have documentary evidence - either from the TES forum or outwith it, for what was said?

    RAWLINSON REPLIED:
    When you can learn to answer questions I put to you more than 2 weeks ago Mr Anonymous, I might consider returning the favour.

    Thank you, Rawlinson, for confirming that the whole Myrtle Thornberry story is a vicious and scurrilous lie.

    Did you possess proof of the story [or could obtain it from Gene Vincent], then you would not have hesitated to publish it, given how much you enjoy kicking people when you tnink they are down. That you have not done so confirms that there is no proof of the story, and hence that it is, as I have always known, the nastiest possible personal attack on me mounted by a disgusting human being. I hope you feel good about allying yourself with a piece of shit like Vincent.

    Thank you and piss off.

    ReplyDelete