Now Detterling let's clear this up for once and for all.
In the matter of the dispute between myself and the feminist Geography HOD I never referred to her as a lesbian. Her sexuality was none of my business. OR IS IT OF YOURS.
The dispute between us arose over her extreme feminism. I felt that her stance on issues impinged on staff freedoms and also affected the Christian ethos of the school.
Yes, she did have an injunction taken out against me but it was quickly lifted when the full facts came before the courts.
Yes, she did make a complaint against me to the DfE but it got nowhere. So who was the winner? Gene of course as usual.
And that reminds me Detterling. You announced some time back that you would publish press articles from the coverage of this contretemps. What happened to that?
Tee! Hee! Hee! Scoff!
GENE
No, Gene, this won't wash - you have only just thought this self-exculpatory bullshit up. Had you not exercised your customary twattish bigotry in the case of the lesbian Geography teacher you would have thought up this lying excuse ages ago. It's like when you lied about meeting me at the Duke of York - it was six weeks before you concocted the lies that you still tell about it - a dead giveaway.
ReplyDeleteNo, I shall let my version stand, I think; it is true to your dirty-minded bigotry, as well as being juicier, nastier, painting you in the worst light possible and above all utterly convincing to anyone who knows you. And if you really "won", why are you trying to sell a sanitised version of this disgraceful and scandalously nasty episode thirteen years later?
As for this
"And that reminds me Detterling. You announced some time back that you would publish press articles from the coverage of this contretemps. What happened to that?"
all I can ask, through tears of laughter, is if there any limits at all to your credulous stupidity, gullibility and self-regarding dimness?
Did you SERIOUSLY imagine that I would spend time, effort and money ferreting about in old newspapers for stories about a trivial little shithouse like you? Do you SERIOUSLY imagine that I have time to waste on nasty, dirty minded little gobshites like you when there books to read [and one to write], music to listen to, and freshly painted doors to watch while they dry. You may or may not be a pompous cunt, but you will do until a pompous cunt comes along.
No, Gene, it was simply one more of the series of ridiculous hoaxes that I pulled on you throughout 2016 and most of 2017, all of which you swallowed whole and which kept your noisome apology of a blog from stinking out the internet for over a year. There was the fictional phone calls to The Good Yarn, then Newcastle Detectives [I nearly peed myself with glee when you fell for that one], then my stalking you in Uxbridge High Street [and thank you Google Earth], and best of all the bogus press release.
And why did you believe them? because you are a self-important twat - as you have just demonstrated again.
On the other hand, they could all have been real, and you are too thick to tell the difference. At any rate I shall incorporate this little exchange on Gene Vincent of Uxbridge before close of play tonight.
Yes, I think Christmas would be a good time to piss on your chips, come to think of it.
'And why did you believe them? because you are a self-important twat - as you have just demonstrated again.'
ReplyDeleteHmm.. 'The worst of all deceivers are the self-deceivers.' (cf Great Expectations by Charles Dickens.)
No hoax your wanting to publishes archival articles from the Uxbridge Gazette etc. If you could have got your hands on this material you would have published it.
You are a pathological liar Detterling. And an incompetents liar.
You memoirs will never be published - but if they are they will be so sanitised and mendacious that they will be pure fiction.
GENE