LGBTQ Catholics consider different ways to fit into the Church
Pope Francis recently gained media attention when he spoke
out against the criminalization of homosexuality ahead of a trip to Africa,
where many countries have such laws on the books. The move highlighted the
precarious situation of many LGBTQ people around the world, and was hailed in
much of the American press as a milestone. His follow-up statement, in which he
acknowledged the inevitable objection he would receive from some quarters within
his church—that homosexual activity is a sin—garnered less fanfare. (“Yes, but
it is a sin,,” Francis said. “Fine, but first let us distinguish between a sin
and a crime.”) This remark, however, echoed loudly in the LGBTQ Catholic
community, whose members hold diverse visions for their Church—which Francis
has called “a mother” who “cares for her children and guides them on the path
of salvation.” Like many mother-child relationships, it’s complicated.
Jesuit priest James Martin was on the cutting edge when he
published Building a Bridge, a book he wrote following the Pulse nightclub
shooting in Orlando, Florida, in 2016. “The book came in response to what I saw
as a real lack of response from the U.S. bishops after the Pulse massacre,”
Martin said in an email to Tablet. While the book drew him into LGBTQ ministry,
garnering invitations to speak to Catholic audiences on related issues,
including the Vatican’s 2018 World Meeting of Families, he said it also “caused
some intense reactions—both positive and negative.” Martin continues undaunted.
In 2020, he launched Outreach, an annual conference for LGBTQ Catholics, which
has expanded to include a website with resources and articles intended to
support them. The fourth Outreach conference was held June 16-18 this year at
Fordham University, and featured a variety of panelists and speakers
representing the spectrum of LGBTQ Catholicism.
A 2020 UCLA study estimates there are around 1.3 million
LGBT adult Catholics in the U.S., although, said Martin, “I would guess, given
how they often feel excluded and rejected, probably a lower percentage than
their straight counterparts” are practicing. This year, the Outreach conference
coincided with a rally at Dodger Stadium, as thousands protested the Sisters of
Perpetual Indulgence, who received a Community Hero award as part of the team’s
Pride night (the U.S. Council of Catholic Bishops voiced their disapproval of
the group’s recognition and urged prayer, but distanced themselves from the
rally).
The official teaching of the Catholic Church is laid out in
its catechism, a nearly thousand-page compendium of every Church teaching on
virtually every subject first commissioned by Pope John Paul II in 1986. He
approved its definitive form in 1992, drawing from the Bible as well as
Catholic theologians, saints, and thinkers throughout history. Its section on
sexuality lays out that sex must not be detached from its “unitive and
procreative purposes” within a heterosexual marriage, and that every baptized
Catholic is “called to lead a chaste life in keeping with their particular
states of life.” This stance is part and parcel of their official opprobrium of
gay sex (or indeed any sex outside of a marriage, including between a man and
woman). Nevertheless, the catechism says in the same section that gay people
“must be accepted with respect, compassion, and sensitivity. Every sign of
unjust discrimination in their regard should be avoided,” even as it
acknowledges its teaching on chastity may lead gay Catholics to encounter
“difficulties.” This, as Christians are fond of saying about more controversial
teachings, is a “hard saying.” So it may seem surprising that there are out,
gay Catholics who have embraced it. It may be even more surprising that there
are gay Catholics who disagree with the Church’s teaching on homosexuality, but
who have remained in the fold, working for change from within, rather than
decamping for other Christian denominations that already allow same-sex
marriage, such as the Episcopal Church, certain branches of the United
Methodist Church, or the Presbyterian Church (USA). The two sides of this coin
are often known in wider gay Catholic circles as “Side A” (supportive of gay
marriage and relationships, hopeful for church recognition), and “Side B”
(promoting celibacy). These distinctions are primarily used by LGBTQ Catholics
in the pews. Leadership is a different story. “Catholic teaching prohibits both
same-sex relations and same-sex marriage,” Martin said in his email. “But, for
example, the German bishops have been very vocal about thinking about blessing
same-sex unions.”
Like any binary, the Side A/Side B terminology contains
nuances, misses subtleties, and obscures touchpoints. What is clear from the
existence of groups and conferences allied with both sides is a sense that more
institutional support for gay Catholics is needed. And even in a church that
famously “thinks in centuries” instead of decades, there are indications that
they are beginning to respond to the signs of the times.
Before Martin, there was Father Patrick Nidorf, an
Augustinian priest in California who in 1969 launched Dignity, a group for gay
Catholics to address what he saw as “an excessive and unreal problem of guilt
that was sometimes reinforced in the confessional instead of being resolved.”
The name, he said later, “just came to me as appropriate since one of our basic
goals was to bring dignity into the spiritual and social lives of some very
special people.” Nidorf ran the group with extraordinary sensitivity, taking
steps to protect the identities and safety of members (age restrictions,
requiring applications—even occasionally personal interviews—to determine good
faith, holding closed meetings in private homes). The concept spread quickly,
initially by word of mouth around Los Angeles and San Diego, where Nidorf was
based. Nidorf published ads in the Los Angeles Free Press and later, The
Advocate, with an address to write to for more information. He would then
disseminate a newsletter with dates and addresses for upcoming meetings. “His
mission really was a place to provide a safe, affirming place for people to
find ways to integrate their sexual orientation and their faith,” said Marianne
Duddy-Burke, the organization’s current executive director, and a keynote
speaker at Outreach 2023. “Church teaching on sexuality was not terribly
articulated at that point, there was just an assumption that everybody was
straight.”
In 1971, Nidorf complied when his archbishop told him to
cease his involvement with Dignity. Now lay-led, it continued gathering steam,
and throughout the 1970s, chapters began to crop up around the country. As it
grew over the decades, Dignity representatives advocated for gay rights
legislation and cultural change on a broader level. Members also met with
bishops to encourage an end to anti-gay discrimination and the promotion of
civil rights, to call for more official Church outreach to gay Catholics, and
to express concerns over the U.S. bishops’ opposition to legislation supporting
initiatives like gay marriage and adoption.
Duddy-Burke attended her first local chapter meeting in 1982 at the suggestion of her straight roommate, who had read about the organization in The Boston Globe Sunday edition, and accompanied her that same night. Duddy-Burke was pursuing a masters in divinity at a Jesuit seminary in the city at the time. A recent college graduate, she had been asked as an undergraduate to resign from her position as president of the college’s Newman Society (a Catholic organization for college students), when the chaplain had learned she was a lesbian. Speaking to me over Zoom, Duddy-Burke was visibly emotional recalling the confrontation that occurred more than 40 years ago. “Catholicism had been just central to my life,” she said. “I was a sophomore in college at that point, and I just lost my connection to Catholic community. I didn’t lose my faith, I didn’t feel any less Catholic, but there just really wasn’t a comfortable place for me to pray and worship as a Catholic, so when my roommate read about Dignity, she’s like, ‘This sounds perfect for you!’” Duddy-Burke felt totally at home she said, and “never left.”
Duddy-Burke places Dignity’s founding within the context of
a changing, post-Vatican II Catholicism. What today is considered a challenge
to Church teaching was, at the time, “just another call for the Church to look
at things differently,” she said. “Here was this group of gay people, gay and
lesbian people, and some straight supporters, who felt like, OK, we’re part of
the church, too, and we’re not finding what we need.” Now called DignityUSA
(there are now chapters in Canada, as well), its mission statement reads: “We
believe that we can express our sexuality physically, in a unitive manner that
is loving, life-giving, and life-affirming. We believe that all sexuality
should be exercised in an ethically responsible and unselfish way. We believe
that our transgender and queer communities can express their core identities in
a sincere, affirming, and authentic manner.”
It would be an anachronism to call Dignity “Side A,” since
its foundation predated the term (and, by a few months, the Stonewall riots);
DignityUSA doesn’t use “Side A/Side B” terminology on its website, and
Duddy-Burke never used the phrase in her interview. But the organization
anticipated a Side A worldview that it continues to put forward today,
maintaining the classic Side A position that gay Catholics can express their
sexuality in a physical relationship. In its work, DignityUSA seeks to obviate
what it sees as a needless contradiction with Church teaching, and is
determined to ensure the Church hears its views.
Today, Duddy-Burke said DignityUSA has a network of about 37
active chapters around the country, as well as nationwide caucuses organized
around interest or identity (categories include women, trans, aging, young
adult, racial justice). “Our work today is really broad,” Duddy-Burke said. In
addition to “maintaining affirming communities for the queer community,” she
said, DignityUSA also engages in advocacy work. At Catholic institutions, that
means challenging the termination of LGBTQ employees, as well as what they see
as anti-trans policies; it also means sending reports to the U.S. Conference of
Catholic Bishops and the Vatican from listening sessions they’ve held with
LGBTQ Catholics. Outside the Church, she said, DignityUSA’s advocacy includes
“working with supportive presidential administrations to ensure that conscience
provisions that would allow health care workers to refuse to treat LGBTQ
people, or to provide certain medical services, are stripped from regulations,”
and working to make foster care “more suited to serving queer youth.” They also
send a contingent of queer youth to the Catholic Church’s international World
Youth Day, which will be held in August of this year in Lisbon, Portugal. “We
make sure that at these local, international church events, we have a group of
people who are willing to say queer people and family members are part of our
church now, and we need appropriate pastoral care, and we need theology and
doctrine that recognizes our humanity and affirms our rights.”
It’s difficult to generalize about “Side B” gay Catholics,
who are trying to live out fulfilling lives in observance of their Church’s
teaching on homosexuality. Eve Tushnet, author of Gay and Catholic: Accepting
My Sexuality, Finding Community, Living My Faith, and an outspoken apologist
for the Church’s teachings on this issue, and Grant Hartley, a celibate gay
Catholic master’s of divinity student, both spoke with Tablet about their
experiences.
Although the precise origin of the terms “Side A” and “Side
B” is unclear, they seem to have begun showing up in the 1990s. (Today, two
additional “sides,” X and Y, are sometimes included: X stands for “ex-gay”
Christians, and Side Y are gay Christians who eschew identifying as gay or
LGBTQ.) It’s a complex ecosystem with some overlap as well as wide chasms;
Christian podcast Life on Side B” provides a helpful if lengthy primer on the
different approaches on its website. A Side B Catholic himself, Hartley is one
of the podcast’s rotating cast of hosts, and, like Duddy-Burke, an Outreach
2023 panelist.
According to Hartley, the underlying idea behind adopting
the language of Sides A and B was so that gay Christians who took different
views on how to live out their faith and sexuality “could both be a part of
this community.” The intent was to avoid charged language, he said in a phone
interview, “like ‘affirming’ and ‘nonaffirming’ can sometimes be, or
‘traditional’ and ‘progressive.’”
A former evangelical Christian, Hartley has only been Catholic a couple of years. He attended the Rite of Christian Initiation for Adults, the Church’s required course for converts, for a year-and-a-half prior to his conversion. “I wanted to make absolutely sure,” he said. “I took my time.” He cites the Catholic Church’s historic and aesthetic legacies as the things that initially attracted him, as well as the biographies of Henry Nouwen and Gerard Manley Hopkins. “I sensed that there was a sort of gay Catholic, queer Catholic theme running through the Church tradition,” he said.
“I was sort of searching for something that would make sense
of sexual ethics for me,” Hartley said. “I had long been convinced of general
teachings about sexuality, about sex reserved for a marriage covenant between a
man and a woman for life.” However, Hartley said, “I never really had a high
view of celibacy until I sort of had to wrestle through, oh, maybe I’m supposed
to be celibate, so I gotta figure out how to love this. And it seemed that the
Catholic tradition—I didn’t have to reinvent the wheel. The Catholic tradition
had a lot to offer when it comes to sort of a system to understand sexuality
and marriage, and a lot of thinking about celibacy, just riches, that were
really encouraging for me.”
As Hartley surveyed the Catholic tradition, he found that
monasticism, celibacy, and same-sex love “are kind of intertwined in a lot of
spaces,” he said. “Maybe my being gay was actually more of a strength than a
weakness.”
Hartley is careful to note, “that’s not the vibe in the
whole Church. There’s portions of the Church I’ve come into contact with that I
don’t feel especially safe or welcome in.”
As for his relationships with his Side A counterparts in the
Church, Hartley is quick to respond when asked if he’s friends with any. “Oh
yeah,” he said. “I think one of the drawbacks of Side A/Side B language is that
it ends up grouping people who come to these conclusions for lots of different
reasons into the same sort of camp, and I think that maybe there’s some
distinctions. So, because one is Side B doesn’t say a whole lot about how they
got there, or about their approach to LGBTQ culture.”
Saying the Side A/Side B language can still be divisive, and
that he “has a lot in common with a lot of Side A folks,” and as an academic
and speaker, Hartley said he isn’t always warmly received by some on Side B
when he speaks positively about LGBTQ culture “in a nuanced and often really
positive way. I see a lot of beauty there.”
Hartley said his own approach is one of reserved humility
when approaching other gay Catholics who don’t share his theology. “We’re all
just trying to sort of survive,” he said. “I don’t want to judge anyone for how
they’re trying to survive LGBTQ Catholic world.”
From one side, Hartley said celibate Catholics can be
challenged by Catholics who view their choice as something that is either a
judgment on noncelibate gay Catholics, or minimized as simply a personal
decision. On the other side, he said celibate gay Catholics can receive pushback
from more conservative Catholics who object to the use of sexual identity
language as an identification “with sinful proclivities or temptations,” and
for their engagement with wider secular LGBTQ culture. Pride, he said, “feels
worse” this year. “It definitely feels like an uptick in anti-LGBTQ rhetoric in
the Christian world,” he said. “All the talk about drag that is just—I just
don’t think that people understand what drag is, actually.”
Duddy-Burke said something similar, observing that she
sometimes feels LGBTQ Catholics are “used as political pawns,” and it’s less
about the issues themselves than “it’s about promoting a Christian nationalist
agenda,” citing recent furor over drag queens and the Sisters of Perpetual
Indulgence being honored at the Dodgers game.
“Virtually anyone who considers themselves to be an LGBTQ or
same-sex-attracted Catholic has gone on some kind of journey,” she said.
Describing “overlapping, intertwining queer and same-sex-attracted
communities,” Tushnet said something that helps them understand each other is
that “we’ve often shared parts of our journey, we’ve wrestled with some of the
same things. Sometimes that makes it hard, I think for some people. It’s very
much like, ‘well, why didn’t you come to the conclusion that I did—the correct
one?’ But I think for other people, the fact of that shared journey can be very
powerful.”
Tushnet’s understanding of celibate gay Catholic life is
complex. Arguments against gay sex from first principles, she has said in
interviews elsewhere, have never made sense to her, but she was able to find
her way into the Church’s arguments around sexuality, marriage, and family life
through her trust in its interpretation of the Bible. However, in writing her
second book, Tenderness: A Gay Christian’s Guide to Unlearning Rejection and
Experiencing God’s Extravagant Love, she same to realize that other gay
Catholics, due to their experience with both the Church and their fellow
Catholics, were not able to arrive at that same sort of trust when it came to
living out something as profoundly countercultural and self-denying as lifelong
celibacy.
“There are still pockets of the Catholic Church where people
are still having experiences in 2023 that sound like they came from 1980,” she
said. “Like, I actually did a bunch of interviews with people who had gone to
Catholic schools, and I’ll have to say, the bad experiences especially, people
said the same thing from the ’70s and like, five years ago.” Echoing
Duddy-Burke, Tushnet said she found there is a persistent attitude that
everyone in Catholic circles is straight.
She is now working on an educational resource for Catholic
institutions, Building Catholic Futures, intended for both kids and parents.
The materials are “created by queer people to serve the needs of queer kids in
the next generation,” and while staying faithful to Catholic orthodoxy,
attempts to avoid catering to the paranoias and fears of what she described as
the “concerned mom person,” the parent who is perplexed by the way the world
has changed from the one she grew up in, and who might be swayed in an anti-gay
direction by some of the existing resources for Christian parents.
“People really said [to me], ‘One thing that would have been
really helpful to me is just to know that there had been gay Christians,
ever,’” she said. “So a real lack of any kind of role model and therefore any
kind of vision for my own future. This comes up again and again, this is why
Building Catholic Futures is called this.” She remembers being a “totally
secular progressive kid” in high school obsessively scouring history, pop
culture, and song lyrics to figure out who was or might be gay. “I think a big
part of that was kind of, ‘what are the possibilities for me?’ So not having
anyone who shares your faith, who’s in your world in that way, who shares the
thing that you’ve been told all your life is the most important thing in life,
and it is actually the most important thing in life, and there’s nobody who you
can look up to in a way that fits with this experience that you’re beginning to
realize that you have, is really devastating—and even with the internet does
still happen.”
Tushnet said she has found in working on Building Catholic
Futures that the gay Catholics she encounters frequently cite queer artists and
writers who had an influence on them, even if they were not themselves
Catholic, or were perhaps dissenters from traditional Catholicism.
“It made me conscious of how much overlap there really is in
both kind of like, the joyful and beautiful aspects of queer experience,” she
said, “and then also the like painful experience of being targeted and
marginalized, that we can really use the guidance of people who disagree with
us profoundly on the authority of the Church or the role of obedience or the
nature of sexuality.”
In speaking with Catholic adults who work with young people,
Tushnet said, “This is really an area where kids do not feel like the Church is
giving them anything to hold on to.”
Even though Duddy-Burke, Hartley, and Tushnet may differ on
the particulars, they all share a hope that the Church is beginning to listen
to new approaches being developed by the laity.
When we spoke, Hartley was amping up to speak in a few weeks
on the Bible and homosexuality and living a life of chastity at Outreach 2023.
He admitted to being less nervous about the chastity panel than another one, on
the Bible and homosexuality. “I feel really comfortable talking about why
celibacy has been really liberating for me, and not like a restrictive
straitjacket,” he said. “But I had to do a lot of research and thinking for the
panel on the Bible and homosexuality” and what he calls “the clobber passages”:
verses from Leviticus condemning homosexual sex, the destruction of Sodom and
Gomorrah, and various letters from the early Church thinkers to fledgling
Christian congregations. “Those aren’t really the bedrock of my sexual ethics,”
he said, “But they are something that LGBTQ folks in religious spaces have to
wrestle with because those are the ones that we’re confronted with.” The other
passages, such as some contents of the Apostle Paul’s letters, are not
necessarily the “slam dunks” against homosexuality that many Bible-quoting
Christians think they are, said Hartley: “I just don’t think that’s true.”
Virtually anyone who considers themselves to be an LGBTQ or
same-sex attracted Catholic has gone on some kind of journey.
For Hartley, historical and cultural context matters. “You
really have to enter into a story. It’s part of what brought me to the Catholic
Church to begin with, is wanting to find myself in a big story of God’s
involvement.” He cites the audience for the Apostle Paul’s letters, which are
famous for some lines that appear to condemn gay sex. “Some of the people
listening to [Paul’s] letters were not in a position to refuse sexual
activity,” Hartley said, “And so when Paul is saying these things, it’s
liberating for his audience. It’s about justice and not just about sexual
morality between equals. So that’s something really important to keep in mind when
thinking through these passages.”
The present matters, too. Citing Leviticus 20:13, Hartley
said, “It struck me that the death penalty for same-sex sex is on the books now
in countries around the world.”
As an evangelical influenced by Protestant sola scriptura beliefs, “I used to think it was just a matter of reading the Bible and applying it in a straightforward way to life,” said Hartley, a view he finds “now sometimes is just downright dangerous.” There is no talk of punishment or retribution for those who violate Church teaching in speaking to Tushnet and Hartley, who were both keen to express the breadth of experiences and viewpoints within the gay Catholic community, on both Sides A and B. Both made a point of stressing their lack of judgment for their fellow gay Catholics. Duddy-Burke said much of the outright opposition that organizations like DignityUSA receive comes from ultra-conservative Catholic individuals and organizations, and occasionally “ex-gay” Catholics. She said there is room for ideological tension within the Church, but “the line gets drawn” when people operating out of animus engage in attacks based on beliefs: calls to violence, “combing records to find out if Catholic school or Catholic parish staff have taken out marriage licenses, or combing Facebook pages or Instagram—it’s that kind of stuff that I think our Church leaders need to be better about challenging, like, that is bad action, your only goal here is to hurt another individual and that needs to be stopped.”
“Many Catholics are concerned more about LGBTQ people’s
sexual morality than almost any other moral issue,” said Martin in his email.
“For some reason (mainly homophobia) it’s the LGBTQ person whose moral life
gets looked at under the microscope. And yet, as you say, Catholics tend to
overlook all sorts of other people whose lives are not in total conformity with
church teaching: straight couples who use birth control, for example. More
fundamentally, we overlook people who are not forgiving, not generous to the
poor, not loving, and so on, things at the heart of the Gospel.”
“In places like sub-Saharan Africa and Eastern Europe,”
Martin continued, “any mention of LGBTQ issues in the Church is incendiary. The
Catholic bishops in Ghana, for example, supported criminalizing homosexuality.
This is one reason why Pope Francis’ call to decriminalize homosexuality, which
may seem tepid in the West, was such a big deal. He’s speaking to the worldwide
Church. In other places, like the U.S. and Western Europe, the discussion is
less contentious, but it is still a hot-button topic.”
Duddy-Burke said she knows gay Catholics in Uganda who have
encountered intense violence and discrimination, and are now fleeing the
prospect of death at the hands of their government. “For the pope to have said
[homosexuality should not be criminalized] is incredibly important for the
people of the world, certainly from a legal perspective but even more from a
cultural perspective,” she said. “I mean, the tone the Catholic Church, the official
Catholic Church, sets, impacts the lives of all 8-plus billion lives of people
on the planet in some ways. The Catholic Church runs the largest private
educational network in the world, the private social services network, private
health care networks. You know, so, so many people across the world, their
lives are just impacted in incredibly important ways by what our Church teaches
and what our Church does.”
It is this concern for the marginalized, that when asked why
she stays Catholic, Duddy-Burke said her reason was her “deep love of what the
Catholic Church is really about,” specifically love and justice. Those two
things, she said, “really are at the core of our Church teaching, and you know,
that means a lot to me. I love the sacraments, the rituals of our Church,” and
“truly believe that every person should have access to that.”
The final keynote speaker at Outreach spoke on Sunday, June
18. Juan Carlos Cruz is a gay Catholic who was appointed in 2021 to the
Pontifical Commission for the Protection of Minors, a whistleblower about
Church sexual abuse who was initially accused by Pope Francis of calumny for
sharing his own story of clerical sexual abuse. Today, “Juanca” and Francis are
good friends; Cruz spoke of the process by which Francis came to realize the
extent of the clerical abuse in Chile after more laity came forward with their
stories, and recanted and apologized to Cruz. Cruz spoke about how he and
Francis are in regular contact, initially with letters, then visits and
frequent phone calls, with Francis sharing movie recommendations with Cruz
during the pandemic. Cruz even helped draft Francis’ talking points on the
decriminalization of homosexuality back in January.
Cruz said he encounters attacks from Catholics for being
openly gay, and from members of the LGBTQ community for his close relationship
with the pope. Someone who speaks with disarming candor of Francis’ quirks and
habits with the easy articulacy of the PR professional that he is, Cruz insists
he is merely a friend and not the pope’s spokesperson. Rather, he feels he has
a responsibility, as someone with a foot in both worlds. “As part of the LGBTQ
community, I think it’s important for me to talk about it, to familiarize
people who have never had access or have been close to this, to normalize it,”
he said.
After his remarks, Martin asked Cruz when things are going
to change for gay Catholics in the Church. “I really don’t know,” Cruz said.
Contrary to the perception, it’s not easy for the pope to change doctrine with
the stroke of the pen, he said
For now, Cruz said of Francis, “I love that he is on the
side of those who suffer.”
Like Hartley, Tushnet looks to the past when thinking about
how the Catholic Church could develop its doctrine going forward.
“Real people who already have partners come to the Church
and say, you know, I made a life commitment to this person—nowadays, I may have
married this person—and I’m beginning to ask questions about my faith, and
wondering if I should kind of come home to the Church. What does that mean for
me?” she said. “In the past, I think it was more likely, sadly, that they would
be told to leave the person, and they would either be like, ‘Absolutely not,
well, I guess this really isn’t as true as I thought it was,’ or you know, make
some pretty tragic decisions.”
Tushnet believes that both the Bible and Catholic history
provide options to recognize same-sex love. She cites the covenant between
David and Jonathan, the love between Ruth and Naomi, as well as a practice from
Eastern Christianity known as adelphopoiesis, a kinship bonding ceremony
between two men that while not a marriage, was a liturgical recognition of
sacrificial same-sex love and support. Tushnet is a fan of the book The Friend
by Alan Bray, a historical examination of the deep emotional and spiritual
component that informed these friendships in Christianity’s past. “People
really rediscover these because they meet a reality, which is, that two people
of the same sex are loving and caring for and cherishing one another, and what
are we going to do about it?” she said. “Are we going to just say well, the
Church can’t acknowledge that at all? And you look, and you don’t have to say
that.”
But Tushnet is careful to caution against one-size-fits-all
solutions for LGBTQ Catholics, slotting covenant friendships “into the cultural
space now taken by marriage, with a loss of other models of community,” she
said, citing the Catholic Worker and intentional community as other
alternatives. “I really don’t want there to be one model and if you do not find
this one model, then you are sort of condemned to loneliness or isolation, or
you’ve failed in some way.”
Even DignityUSA doesn’t discount celibacy as a way of life
for gay Catholics. “Dignity believes that there certainly are people who are
called to celibacy either lifelong or for a part of their lives, and that’s
fine, and it’s a sacred way of life in the same way, you know, lots of other
ways of life are sacred. Our problem is that it should not be imposed based on
identity,” said Duddy-Burke. “There needs to be a recognition that gender
identity, that sexual orientation are an inherent part of who we are.”
Acknowledging that “there are people who choose celibacy for good reasons, for
healthy reasons, for whom it helps them to lead a good and healthy life,” she
added that “it should not be demanded of people” out of what she called “a very
outdated understanding of what humanity is.”
Although he arrives at a different conclusion, Hartley makes
a similar point. “There has to come a point as a Side B person,” he said, “when
you choose your life, too.” He notes a “long history of being constrained, of
being chosen, and it feeling like, I didn’t have anything to do with it, God
sort of has this for me.” He had to “choose it back,” he said. “Something opens
up, and you get to find a lot of joy in your life. So that’s what I’m
experiencing, or have experienced, over the past few years, and I hope to
experience even more.”
Tushnet said she has begun to place increasing emphasis on
solidarity in addressing LGBTQ Catholics. Whether or not gay Catholics choose
to engage with the broader secular LGBTQ culture, Tushnet said she tries to
remind them that “you do owe these people. You have not really fled to the
Church as your haven, and you can just sort of hunker down there and be happy,
you know, with the priest who knows and likes you. You do have some
responsibility to give back.”
This solidarity is a key part of the philosophy, “or rather,
the theology” behind the Outreach conference, said Martin. “It is very much
along the lines of Pope Francis’ model of the Church as a field hospital,” he
said, “which not only treats people who have been wounded—in this case, often
by the Church itself—but is radically open. What people sometimes forget is
that the heart of Church teaching is not a book. It’s a person: Jesus. And by
embodying his welcome of everyone, we are embodying Church teaching.”
No comments:
Post a Comment