THIS GUY TELLS IT LIKE IT IS!
Rev. Calvin Robinson
| Christianity SHOULD NOT allow gay marriage
| Oxford Union
" Bishops are promoting the idea of sacramental sodomy. Let them be Anathema. "
Hear! Hear!
More demented bigotry from the increasingly pathologically obsessed Gene Vincent.
ReplyDeleteIt is becoming blindingly obvious that Gene's obsessive hatred for homosexuality and homosexuals is curdling into a pathology, if not a psychosis. The strain of lying to himself about his own sexual ambivalence - evidenced not least by his over-wrought fixation on anal sexual intercourse, both hetero- and homosexual - is obviously approaching a point where something is about to give way.
Gene's personality crawls with clues - his claims to have fathered children with other men's wives - not only heterosexual but dominantly and piratically so; his boasting about his shameless sexual groping of young female colleagues [he would have run a mile had one of them opened her legs for him]; and of course his coarse scoffing at homosexuals - shirt-lifters, poofters, nancy-boys - all unmistakable evidence of his own self-loathing.
Most telling of all is his reaction to this insight - immediate censorship and removal of a post about it yesterday. Gene's inability to face the truth about himself is part of the series of fugues, flights from reality, of which the one he cannot face is the fact that the love he cannot stop himself obsessing about is also the one he dare not name in his own psyche. Sad, so sad.
Nor is there any point in refuting the crazed piffle of his current abusive posts about homosexuality. If you do, Gene will not engage with your arguments. Rather he merely selects statements from your counter-arguments, adds them to his original post and then simply gainsays them without engaging with your argument, usually adding an ad hominem insult about the your “impaired mental condition”. In this way he hopes to prevent any readers from following the argument below his original posts, thus distracting attention from the fact that his demented bigotry is, always and inevitably, humiliatingly and completely, exposed and defeated.
It also enables him to claim victory in arguments in which he is crushingly defeated. He used the same dishonest tactics years ago on TES Opinion, when his inept casuistry regularly turned him into a laughing stock, and his obtuseness used to both amuse and enrage.
I for one am done with wasting my time arguing with Gene, who has no regard at all for truth, honesty and integrity in debate. All he cares about is “winning” and, given that his arguments are so intellectually feeble and logically flawed, the only way he can even appear to win is to cheat.
He will, no doubt, claim that my resolve to stop debating his ridiculous bigotry is another “victory”, crowing about “bottle jobs” and insulting me as becoming senile - that is par for Gene’s malicious, nasty and shallow character. But somewhere, deep down, Gene knows what a shabby, dishonest, hypocritical fraud he is; and one day, I hope, he will find the guts to own this.
Miracles, after all, do happen.
Don't abuse me. Answer Rev. Calvin Robinson:
ReplyDelete" Bishops are promoting the idea of sacramental sodomy. Let them be Anathema. "
Sacramental is a word describing "an observance analogous to but not reckoned among the sacraments, such as the use of holy water or the sign of the cross.".
DeleteIt follows then, that Calvin Robinson is claiming that bishops are promoting the notion of an act of anal intercourse as part of a religious observance.
That is too stupid an idea to engage with.
Nor have I abused you: I have offered a reasoned analysis of your deplorable attitudes to homosexuality which actually provides excuses for your uniquely horrible nastiness. I prefer that to the idea that you have abused your intelligence and mine by behaving like a disgusting travesty of a human being all these years.
Delete"It follows then, that Calvin Robinson is claiming that bishops are promoting the notion of an act of anal intercourse as part of a religious observance."
DeleteNo it does not. It laments that, in promoting gay marriage in the C of E, bishops are giving a sacramental blessing to sodomy. Marriage is one of the seven sacraments.
And by the way, there is nothing homosexual about me. I, for some years now, have committed myself to fighting two great and damaging evils: abortion and the promotion of homosexual activity.
ReplyDeleteDamaging to the Faith. Damaging to our society.
It is becoming blindingly obvious that Gene's obsessive hatred for homosexuality and homosexuals is curdling into a pathology, if not a psychosis. The strain of lying to himself about his own sexual ambivalence - evidenced not least by his over-wrought fixation on anal sexual intercourse, both hetero- and homosexual - is obviously approaching a point where something is about to give way.
ReplyDeleteGene's personality crawls with clues - his claims to have fathered children with other men's wives - not only heterosexual but dominantly and piratically so; his boasting about his shameless sexual groping of young female colleagues [he would have run a mile had one of them opened her legs for him]; and of course his coarse scoffing at homosexuals - shirt-lifters, poofters, nancy-boys - all unmistakable evidence of his own self-loathing.
I wonder you don't present this to your online psychotherapists forum? You wouldn't dare. They may be a bunch of clapped out pseuds but nevertheless you would be laughed off the forum for this,
DeleteEvasion, bluster, bullshit. Not biting.
Delete"It follows then, that Calvin Robinson is claiming that bishops are promoting the notion of an act of anal intercourse as part of a religious observance."
ReplyDeleteNo it does not. It laments that, in promoting gay marriage in the C of E, bishops are giving a sacramental blessing to sodomy. Marriage is one of the seven sacraments.
It is a pity that more young men of the caliber of Rev Calvin Robinson are not coming through as priests in the C of E.
DeleteIf there were the C of E would not be f**ked.
And Calvin Robinson assumes, as you do, that all homosexuals couples express their sexuality via anal sexual intercourse. If he and you think that then you are making a ridiculous and unevidenced assumption.
DeleteNot to mention that a substantial number of heterosexual couples enjoy anal intercourse.
And come to think of it you once crowed about buggering my wife.
Another total fail for Gene Vincent, the Boris Johnson of morality.
"And Calvin Robinson assumes, as you do, that all homosexuals couples express their sexuality via anal sexual intercourse. If he and you think that then you are making a ridiculous and unevidenced assumption."
DeleteOh! yes. This often is the response from the Gay Lobby. The Gay Lobby do not wish to acknowledge that acceptance of the depraved act of sodomy is what it campaigns for.
But this cannot be disguised. Why do you think that the Reverend Ian Paisley called his campaign: SAVE ULSTER FROM SODOMY?
"No it does not. It laments that, in promoting gay marriage in the C of E, bishops are giving a sacramental blessing to sodomy. Marriage is one of the seven sacraments."
DeleteMarriage is not a sacrament in the Church of England. The Church of England celebrates only two rituals as sacraments - Baptism and Confirmation.
Yet another humiliating fail for Gene Vincent, the Joey Essex of theology.
"Marriage is not a sacrament in the Church of England. The Church of England celebrates only two rituals as sacraments - Baptism and Confirmation."
DeleteMarriage is one of the seven sacraments in the holy catholic and apostolic church. If the C of E says otherwise it is not holy and apostolic. And, don't let any of your High Anglican friends hear you say that there are only two sacraments.
"Oh! yes. This often is the response from the Gay Lobby. The Gay Lobby do not wish to acknowledge that acceptance of the depraved act of sodomy is what it campaigns for."
ReplyDeleteNo, this is not the case - they do not need to campaign for the acceptance of anal sexual intercourse, because it is not an offence in law,and has not since the Sexual Offences Act of 1967. This legalised anal sexual intercourse between consenting males in private. It follows therefore that there has been no need to campaign for its acceptance for the past 56 years.
The trouble with making stuff up, Gene, is that your offensive stupidity can be exposed by two minutes' research on the internet.
Yet another humiliating fail for Gene Vincent, the David Beckham of theology.
"Why do you think that the Reverend Ian Paisley called his campaign: SAVE ULSTER FROM SODOMY?"
Because he was a bigoted simpleton with a bogus degree like you.
"Because he was a bigoted simpleton with a bogus degree like you."
DeleteI shall be informing Oxford University about this.
Oh, grow up, you stupid bugger. On se
Delete"No, this is not the case - they do not need to campaign for the acceptance of anal sexual intercourse, because it is not an offence in law, and has not since the Sexual Offences Act of 1967. This legalised anal sexual intercourse between consenting males in private. It follows therefore that there has been no need to campaign for its acceptance for the past 56 years."
ReplyDelete!!!!! HOW COULD YOU WRITE SOMETHING LIKE THIS????
You have well and truly lost it Detterling. Yes, we all know about the legal position but that is far from the vile act sodomy being accepted. The vast majority in society recoil from accepting this depraved act. Such acceptance is what the Gay Lobby campaign for. But it is fighting a lost cause. Sodomy will always be seen with revulsion by most people.
Your bleating about my having "lost it" is no substitute for a reasoned argument proving my above statement wrong. Because, as usual, you can't produce one, you have to resort to piffling ad hominem.
ReplyDeleteIf this dazzingly barmy statement - "The Gay Lobby do not wish to acknowledge that acceptance of the depraved act of sodomy is what it campaigns for." means anything, it could be one of several things. Either that:
[a] homosexuals are campaigning for the legalisation of male homosexual anal intercourse - which would be a work of supererogation, given that this already happened, fifty six years ago.
or that
[b] homosexuals are campaigning for EVERYONE - heterosexuals, homosexuals, bisexuals - to practise male anal intercourse - which is demonstrable nonsense; produce me one printed or published source in which this is advocated by a homosexual pressure group
or that
[c] homosexuals are campaigning for all homosexuals to accept male anal intercourse as the norm for expressing their sexuality, and are pressuring those who don't to do so. This, again, is demonstrable nonsense; produce me one printed or published source in which this is advocated by a homosexual pressure group
or
[d] that homosexuals are campaigning for all heterosexuals to accept male anal intercourse as the norm for expressing their homosexual sexuality, and are pressuring those who don't to do so. Again, produce me a shred of evidence that this is the case.
You can't because there is none.
What homosexuals want - and are perfectly entitled to receive, is to be allowed to express their sexuality in whatever way suits them and their partners, without the bullying interference of the likes of Gene Vincent or the "Rev Dr" Ian Paisley.
All of which begs the question, which is that there is no such thing as the "Gay Lobby" - it is an invention of the foetid imaginings of prurient bigots like Gene Vincent. An overwhelming majority of homosexuals simply wish to live their lives peacefully and discreetly without imposing their views on others, or obliging them to know or approve of their private sexual practices, just as no-one gives a toss about how often Gene Vincent wanks himself cross-eyed over pin-up photographs of other repressed homosexuals like James Dean.
To maintain otherwise would be like maintaining that because the Roman Catholic Gene Vincent is a posturing, ignorant, bullying bigot and a thoroughly nasty piece of work, that all Roman Catholics are posturing, ignorant, bullying bigots and thoroughly nasty pieces of work into the bargain. This is as false an assumption as any of Gene's preposterous assertions about the non-existent Gay Lobby.
Another shockingly bad fail and thorough humiliation for Gene Vincent, the Richard Littlejohn of sexual politics.
Oh, I nearly forgot to ask: when is "Granny Barkes fell in Woolworths coming out?
"What homosexuals want - and are perfectly entitled to receive, is to be allowed to express their sexuality in whatever way suits them and their partners"
ReplyDeleteSUCH ACCEPTANCE WILL NEVER HAPPEN!
As I have pointed out the vast majority - religious or nonreligious - recoil from the depravity of sodomy and other homosexual practices.
And you must be the only person in the universe who denies the existence of the Gay Lobby.
Bluster, gainsaying, denial. No shred of argument. Not biting. Piss off.
Delete"Marriage is not a sacrament in the Church of England. The Church of England celebrates only two rituals as sacraments - Baptism and Confirmation."
ReplyDeleteMarriage is one of the seven sacraments in the holy catholic and apostolic church. If the C of E says otherwise it is not holy and apostolic. And, don't let any of your High Anglican friends hear you say that there are only two sacraments.
"The Church of England believes that there are seven sacraments."
ReplyDeleteNo, it doesn't.
"Two of these Baptism and the Eucharist (Communion, Mass or the Lord’s Supper) are considered ‘Sacraments ordained of Christ in the Gospels’."
True.
The other five are commonly called Sacraments BUT NOT TO BE COUNTED AS SACRAMENTS OF THE GOSPEL.
So the Church of England DOES NOT "believe in seven sacraments".
Christ, Gene, can't you get ANYTHING right?