Anyone who knows me knows that I am a man of absolutely searing honesty...
Anyone who knows me knows that I am a man of absolutely searing honesty, so I'll be honest about this. One of my little peccadilloes in my teaching years was to pat on the backside young female cutie colleagues. About this Detterling recently wrote:
"...is the kind of grubby, furtive sexually motivated behaviour to which you have admitted, which is disguised as something else - again to which you have admitted."
I must admit Detterling's comment has got to me. Yes, this behaviour was furtive and grubby. I repent. I blame my enormous libido. I could never resist a shapely backside - especially if the VPL (visible panty line) was on display. If I could put things right retrospectively I would.
VISIBLE PANTY LINES
What arse-crawling, self-serving BOLLOCKS.
ReplyDeleteYou congratulate yourself on the "searing honesty" which enables you to brush off your grubby, furtive sexually motivated behaviour, pawing and groping junior colleagues, as "one of your little peccadilloes". Your pathological narcissism is reaching psychotic levels. What a sickeningly smarmy get you are, one of the few people I know able to kiss his own arse.
But never mind that.
When are you going to tell us how you reconcile your "christianity" with your love of pornography, which exploits and degrades women?
And how do you reconcile your "christianity" with using pornography to insult and belittle a good christian woman, a superb mother and wonderful wife - who is worth fifty of you?
And how do you reconcile your "christianity" with groping young women sexually in a pretence of avuncular interest?
And date, place and verdict of the "Myrtle Thornberry" "inquest", please.
"When are you going to tell us how you reconcile your "christianity" with your love of pornography, which exploits and degrades women?"
ReplyDeleteI abhor pornography. You know that but you persist in these lies.
I have apologised for one of my little peccadilloes but you dismiss my apology. There is no pleasing you Detters is there?
BOLLOCKS.
ReplyDelete"I repent." That means bugger all unless you back it up with practical action - such as seeking out the women you groped and apologising to them for your grubby, furtive, sexually motivated behaviour, pawing and groping them.
"I blame my enormous libido." - OF COURSE! it's never YOU to blame, is it, Gene, you devious, hypocritical bastard? It's your enormous libido, something entirely separate from you over which you have no control....
Your apology, like your "searing honesty", is bogus; and you wouldn't have made it at all had I not cornered you.
As for pleasing me, yes, you can please me. You can take down this appalling blog once and for all, and thus relieve me of the task of dropping you neck deep in the shit. It's not something I am looking forward to doing, but you leave me no alternative.
And MAKE NO MISTAKE - it IS going to happen; and it will be timed to make the maximum noise and cause the maximum fuss. It is only a matter of time...and time is running out.
But apart from that, when are you going to tell us how you reconcile your "christianity" with your love of pornography, which exploits and degrades women?
And how do you reconcile your "christianity" with using pornography to insult and belittle a good christian woman, a superb mother and wonderful wife - who is worth fifty of you?
And how do you reconcile your "christianity" with groping young women sexually in a pretence of avuncular interest, and thinking that an "apology" published anonymously on a blog that nobody reads can somehow atone for it?
And date, place and verdict of the "Myrtle Thornberry" "inquest", please.
"seeking out the women you groped"
ReplyDeleteAre you totally obtuse Detterling?
How many times do I have to say that I have never groped any woman?
GENE
PS
The Church of England is f**ked.
Gene, YOU call ME totally obtuse? You, the grubby, furtive groper and pawer of women? You, the demented halfwit who thinks that a lie told a hundred times magically becomes the truth?
ReplyDeleteSo your lies about your no-show at Duke of York, the TES Opinion "Clique", about "Granny Pissfeatures crapped herself in C & A" or whatever that non-existent "novel" is called now, the "suicide" of "Myrtle Thornberry" [a name you made up and don't always spell the same way], correspondence with Clive James, Christopher Ricks, Libby Purves, Richard Dawkins, having been told hundreds of times, are now all facts are they?
As is the "fact" that you never groped or pawed young female colleagues. even though you have admitted to your grubby, furtive and sexually motivated behaviour in foisting your sleazy sexual attentions on them.
All of which leaves five big questions to which it would be good to have truthful answers, viz:
how do you reconcile your "christianity" with your love of pornography, which exploits and degrades women?
how do you reconcile your "christianity" with using pornography to insult and belittle a good christian woman, a superb mother and wonderful wife - who is worth fifty of you?
how do you reconcile your "christianity" with groping young women sexually in a pretence of avuncular interest, and thinking that an "apology" published anonymously on a blog that nobody reads can somehow atone for it?
how do you reconcile your claim to be "searingly honest" with the string of your outrageous lies referenced in my second paragraph above?
And when are you going either to publish the attested date, place and verdict of the "Myrtle Thornberry" "inquest", or finally admit that you made the whole thing up?
"... even though you have admitted to your grubby, furtive and sexually motivated behaviour in foisting your sleazy sexual attentions on them."
DeleteNO!
I have admitted to occasionally giving an avuncular pat on the backside to a young gorgeous bit of stuff - especially if she was showing VPL. Not really my fault - just a combination of my enormous libido and the visible pantie line.
I note that you have, ipso facto, admitted the the Church of England is f**ked.
BOLLOCKS.
ReplyDeleteAs you have admitted above, your behaviour was furtive, grubby, sleazy and sexually motivated, however desperately you are trying now to spin it as "avuncular" [pass the sick bag].
And, moreover, in your own words, you have owned your sexual motivation, which makes nonsense of your weaselling and whingeing above, as follows:
"Believe me no red-blooded middle-aged man gives a young gorgeous bit of stuff a hug with anything but lust his motivation."
And you really should look up the phrase ipso facto and find out what it really means. Not that it matters: neither I, nor the Church of England cares two straws about the pissy little opinions of a Catholic whose dirty-minded nastiness belies every tenet of the believes he professes, but betrays by almost his every action and word.
Or, in short piss off.
..."ipso facto" by not challenging my assertion that the C of E is f**ked you agree it is. Well according to your twisted logic in previous posts.
ReplyDeleteAnd 'ipso facto' can be used perfectly well here whatever your views.
I didn't challenge your assertion because it is the negligible opinion of an exceptionally negligible man, as well as being meaningless. Do you mean that it is fucked in the way that the Catholic Church is, being staffed in significant part by men who only stop raping small girls when they start buggering small boys, for example?
ReplyDeleteAnd my logic is not twisted, unlike your mind. If you are accused of three things and deny only two of them then you have, imnplicitly and tacitly, admitted the third. Research at the University of Pennsylvania shows that in court a defendant is seventy times more liable to deny a false accusation than a true one, however incriminating such an admission may turn out to be. This research formed the pivot of an absolutely fascinating seminar in my psychotherapists' online forum, involving a Catholic priest, a teenage girl and a male altar server. So your complete inability to reply to and refute any of the points I made in my previous post means that you have tacitly admitted the fact that your behaviour was furtive, grubby, sleazy and sexually motivated, however desperately you are trying now to spin it as "avuncular" [pass the sick bag].
Come to think of it, how are you getting on with your application to the forum? I haven't noticed any new members claiming to have written Tanya Byron's thesis for her whilst counselling the Archbishop of Westminster and shagging his secretary, so I'm guessing you got the knock back.
But never mind all that:
how do you reconcile your "christianity" with your love of pornography, which exploits and degrades women?
how do you reconcile your "christianity" with using pornography to insult and belittle a good christian woman, a superb mother and wonderful wife - who is worth fifty of you?
how do you reconcile your "christianity" with groping young women sexually in a pretence of avuncular interest, and thinking that an "apology" published anonymously on a blog that nobody reads can somehow atone for it?
how do you reconcile your claim to be "searingly honest" with the string of your outrageous lies referenced in my second paragraph above?
And when are you going either to publish the attested date, place and verdict of the "Myrtle Thornberry" "inquest", or finally admit that you made the whole thing up?
Gene Vincent is fucked and so is his blog.
ReplyDelete"I haven't noticed any new members claiming to have written Tanya Byron's thesis for her whilst counselling the Archbishop of Westminster and shagging his secretary, so I'm guessing you got the knock back."
What on earth are you talking about???
A few weeks ago you boasted that you had found the psychotherapists' forum I belong to and were going to join it because the qualifications were so easy to obtain. Had you joined I have no doubt we should have enjoyed rip-roaring good fun such as I describe above. However you have no chance of joining as you have no qualifications or experience, although you might form the subject of a study of what motivates past-it middle-aged men to grope and paw young women and pass it off as avuncular interest.
ReplyDeleteBut never mind all that:
how do you reconcile your "christianity" with your love of pornography, which exploits and degrades women?
how do you reconcile your "christianity" with using pornography to insult and belittle a good christian woman, a superb mother and wonderful wife - who is worth fifty of you?
how do you reconcile your "christianity" with groping young women sexually in a pretence of avuncular interest, and thinking that an "apology" published anonymously on a blog that nobody reads can somehow atone for it?
how do you reconcile your claim to be "searingly honest" with the string of outrageous lies you have told on this blog and in which you have persisted despite never being able to substantiate any of them?
And when are you going either to publish the attested date, place and verdict of the "Myrtle Thornberry" "inquest", or finally admit that you made the whole thing up?
Yes I know about the online psychotherapists' online forum - a haven for clapped-out pseuds if you ask me.
DeleteWhat I want to know is who is Tanya Byron and what is this about oounselling the Archbishop of Westminster and shagging his secretary?
Methinks you have lost it Detterling.
Come off it, Gene. If you don't know who Tanya Byron is you have no business trying to muscle in on a psychotherapists' forum - although if it really were a "forum for clapped out pseuds" you'd end up as webmaster. The A of W and his secretary [who is a man, by the way] is the kind of smarmy, grubby, nonsensical joke you write and think is funny. Now you know it isn't, perhaps you'll shut the fuck up.
ReplyDeleteBut never mind all that:
how do you reconcile your "christianity" with your love of pornography, which exploits and degrades women?
how do you reconcile your "christianity" with using pornography to insult and belittle a good christian woman, a superb mother and wonderful wife - who is worth fifty of you?
how do you reconcile your "christianity" with groping young women sexually in a pretence of avuncular interest, and thinking that an "apology" published anonymously on a blog that nobody reads can somehow atone for it?
how do you reconcile your claim to be "searingly honest" with the string of outrageous lies you have told on this blog and in which you have persisted despite never being able to substantiate any of them?
And when are you going either to publish the attested date, place and verdict of the "Myrtle Thornberry" "inquest", or finally admit that you made the whole thing up?
"The A of W and his secretary [who is a man, by the way..."
ReplyDeleteSo the A of W's secretary is a man. Now why would I, of all men, be interested in sexual congress with that individual?
Drop it, Gene, you are fooling no-one. Nitpicking of this kind makes it look as though you are replying, when in fact all you are doing is avoiding doing so. You can't even waffle competently. Is there anything you are actually good at, apart from writing incompetent pornography about sodomising other men's wives?
ReplyDeleteWhich reminds me:
how do you reconcile your "christianity" with your love of pornography, which exploits and degrades women?
how do you reconcile your "christianity" with using pornography to insult and belittle a good christian woman, a superb mother and wonderful wife - who is worth fifty of you?
how do you reconcile your "christianity" with groping young women sexually in a pretence of avuncular interest, and thinking that an "apology" published anonymously on a blog that nobody reads can somehow atone for it?
how do you reconcile your claim to be "searingly honest" with the string of outrageous lies you have told on this blog and in which you have persisted despite never being able to substantiate any of them?
And when are you going either to publish the attested date, place and verdict of the "Myrtle Thornberry" "inquest", or finally admit that you made the whole thing up?