Monday, 17 May 2021

 

President Biden and Public Scandal

Dear Friends: Today we have a hard-hitting column by our TCT colleague and my Papal Posse co-conspirator Fr. Gerald Murray on something that’s going to occupy all of us for at least the next four years: the scandal of an ardent pro-abortion and pro-LGBT president – nominally a Catholic – who seems hell-bent (I used the term advisedly) on using the power of the federal government not only to advance that radical social agenda but to force institutions like Catholic hospitals, schools, universities, adoption agencies, and many more to accept it. We also bring you a new podcast (click under TCT video) in which I discuss with Brad Miner the new edition of his book “The Compleat Gentleman.”  I’ve known Brad many years but reading those pages gave me even greater appreciation for his wisdom, wit, and good sense. Do yourself a favor: buy it and read it for pleasure but also inspiration. Many of you are also enrolled in our current online course on Dante’s Purgatorio. We’ve got other course offerings like that one lined up for later in this year – the sheer size of the response to the first offerings told us that many of our readers are eager to connect more deeply with our Catholic tradition. We’re determined to help with that. But this brings me to my reason for writing: we cannot do any of these things without you. In a few weeks, we’ll celebrate thirteen years of publishing The Catholic Thing. That means we’ve survived the housing bubble bursting, various other ups and downs, COVID and the lockdowns, and much more. And the reason for our longevity is that we have such loyal and generous readers – such as yourself. We only come to you twice a year, once around now and then again towards the end of the year. We can do that because my confidence in our readership has never proved false in all that time. So let me just say simply: you know why you come here every day, and you know the many battles in which we are engaged. My sense is we’ll have to be able to do even more for the rest of 2021 – and that includes returning to our analysis of things going on in Rome as those start up again. No one in the usual institutions is going to carry out his work; that puts the responsibility directly on all of us. So please – just click the Donate button below. Follow the simple steps. Do your part in keeping this Catholic Thing of ours alive and kicking in 2021 and for many years to come– Robert Royal


 

Should President Joseph Biden be admitted to Holy Communion when he attends Mass? The simple answer is, “No,” owing to his public and unwavering support for legalized abortion. Canon 915 of the Code of Canon Law states: “Those. . .obstinately persevering in manifest grave sin are not to be admitted to holy communion.” Abortion, the killing of innocent unborn children, is a grave sin, as is the legalization and promotion of this heinous practice. It’s a criminal violation of an unborn person’s right to life.

In the 2002 Doctrinal Note on some questions regarding the Participation of Catholics in Political Life, Cardinal Ratzinger, then Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (CDF), stated: “John Paul II, continuing the constant teaching of the Church, has reiterated many times that those who are directly involved in lawmaking bodies have a ‘grave and clear obligation to oppose’ any law that attacks human life. For them, as for every Catholic, it is impossible to promote such laws or to vote for them.” (Emphasis added)

In the 2004 Worthiness to Receive Holy Communion: General Principles Ratzinger specifically instructed the U.S. bishops that a Catholic politician engages in formal cooperation with the sin of abortion when he consistently campaigns and votes for permissive abortion laws. President Biden obviously promotes the abortion license and has directed that taxpayers’ dollars pay for abortions. He’s an unapologetic and determined promoter of this immoral attack on human life. This is an indisputable fact. Just ask his supporters at Planned Parenthood and NARAL.

Ratzinger told the U.S. bishops that, dealing with such a politician, “his Pastor should meet with him, instructing him about the Church’s teaching, informing him that he is not to present himself for Holy Communion until he brings to an end the objective situation of sin, and warning him that he will otherwise be denied the Eucharist.” He also cited a 2002 Declaration from the Pontifical Council for Legislative Texts: “When ‘these precautionary measures have not had their effect or in which they were not possible,’ and the person in question, with obstinate persistence, still presents himself to receive the Holy Eucharist, ‘the minster of Holy Communion must refuse to distribute it.’” (Emphasis added)

The Declaration explains: “The decision, properly speaking, is not a sanction or a penalty. Nor is the minister of Holy Communion passing judgment on the person’s subjective guilt, but rather is reacting to the person’s public unworthiness to receive Holy Communion due to an objective situation of sin.”

*

An objective situation of sin is scandalous in this case because such a Catholic politician who consistently promotes abortion by that very conduct actively encourages others to fall into the same sin. In Biden’s case, his well-known campaign promises to keep abortion legal and federally funded is clear evidence of his rejection of Catholic moral teaching. He plainly intended to convince other Catholics to join him in gravely sinful behavior. Such conduct renders him publicly unworthy to receive Holy Communion.

The facts, and the applicability of canon 915 to those facts, are indisputable.

For this reason, the recent Letter of the CDF Prefect, Cardinal Ladaria, to the American bishops is disappointing, even confounding. Remarkably, he never mentions canon 915. He calls for dialogue among the bishops “so that they could agree as a Conference that support of pro-choice legislation is not compatible with Catholic teaching.” But the matter is already beyond question. Any bishop who does not agree “that support of pro-choice legislation is not compatible with Catholic teaching” should change his mind or his job.

Ladaria then calls for dialogue with Catholic politicians “who adopt a pro-choice position. . .as a means of understanding their positions and their comprehension of Catholic teaching.” Really? After almost 50 years of legalized abortion, the “pro-choice” position needs no further study. Let alone “dialogue.” It is hard to imagine that President Biden and other Catholic advocates of legalized abortion are unaware of what the Church teaches about the sanctity of human life. They just don’t follow it.

Ladaria calls for further dialogue among the bishops, with other episcopal conferences, and further consultation with his office. How long would this process take? It’s a needless delay in tackling a major scandal.

The Church has a duty to teach God’s law and to sanction members who egregiously and continuously exempt themselves from obedience to that law – and encourage others to do the same. Depriving them of Holy Communion, we may hope, will jar them into reforming their conduct and their opposition to God’s binding law for all mankind.

Public defiance of God’s prohibition of unjust killing is an attack upon the faith and unity of the Church. The Church has a responsibility before God to lead the flock away from diabolical disobedience and into grace-filled obedience.

A Catholic who falls into immoral behavior, knowing that the Church has condemned it, should be presumed by his pastor to be imperiling his soul and the souls of those he is influencing. He needs to be told that his objectively sinful behavior constitutes a culpable offense for which he needs to seek pardon after repenting.

The American bishops should act as a group, and individually in their dioceses, to end the scandal of the continued administration of Our Lord’s Most Holy Body and Blood to the highest public official in our land. To fail to do so amounts to a refusal to uphold the Church’s canon law, to the grave harms of souls. It would be a negligent passivity, a failure to defend the sanctity of the Christ’s greatest gift to his Church.

And it would communicate to all the message that God may be mocked without consequence when an important Catholic public figure decides to support, not God’s law, but rather the gruesome linchpin of the sexual revolution, unfettered legal abortion.

 

*Image: During the 2020 presidential campaign, Joe Biden poses at the Bethel AME Church in Wilmington, Delaware [CNS photo/Jim Bourg, Reuters]


4 comments:

  1. Dear Mr Kennedy:

    In the process of closing down my husband's laptop computer I found this unsent letter from him. Noting your name I found your blog.

    What is your explanation for this outrageous, not to say obscene nonsense? Life is hard enough at the moment without having to cope with filth of this sort. I have passed this document, and several others i have found, to my solicitor to see if it is possible to take some sort of legal action against you.

    Yours etc, "Delia Detterling".

    My husband's letter is below. It is not dated, but it was probably written at some point during the summer of 2020.

    Dear “Marianne”:

    I felt that I should bring to your attention this deranged email I received this morning from your husband Robert Kennedy. It purports to analyse my attitude to homosexuality and the practice of sodomy and also to offer an insight into my relationship with my nephew.

    Factually, everything that your husband says about my nephew and me is complete and utter nonsense, and his supposed insights into my psychology are as wrong as they are impertinent. I have no problems whatsoever with accepting homosexuality and homosexuals as a fact of life, and whilst I may find sodomy distasteful purely on hygienic grounds, I regard what happens in private between consenting adults as no-one’s business but theirs.

    The reference to my wife and sodomy, is explained as follows: Some years ago, on his blog, your husband published the diseased fantasy below about my wife [whom he calls Delia]. The reference to “Fellini” references the film “8½” which refers to the fact that your husband claims that his penis is eight and a half inches long. This post was published on Gene’s Musings on Monday, June 12rh, 2017.

    “Detters I had a very powerful dream about Delia the other night. It was so erotic. A bit fuzzy about how things began in the dream but I remember it clearly from the point where I had just given her a good spanking. Nothing hurtful ... just a firm spanking. Afterwards Delia lay on her back saying,
    "That was wonderful Gene ... but now I really need Le Coq Sportif. I need Fellini in action."

    "Okay Delia, get on your hands and knees," I commanded.

    She did so and I mounted her from the rear Doggy style. As we know the Doggy position is Delia's favourite. Oops! Sorry, I forgot. You wouldn't know that Detters would you as you don't 'service' Delia.

    Tee! Hee! Hee! Hee! Chortle! Chortle!

    GENE”

    ReplyDelete
  2. Dear Robert Part II:

    The fact that Robert added the Tee! Hee! Hee! Hee! Chortle! Chortle! sign-off at the end points unmistakeably to a psychosis. Someone who could concoct this kind of nasty fantasy having sex with another man’s wife, publish it purely with the intention of hurting that man’s feelings and think that the whole thing is funny is someone in need of professional help.

    And when to that appalling piece of nastiness he adds the demented piffle I reproduce below, then I don’t feel that I can justify my continuing to stand aside and watch this man’s descent into madness any longer. I have known for years that Robert suffers from a narcissistic personality disorder – his fantasies about having published novels, his literary pretensions, his claims to friendship and correspondence with Clive James, Christopher Ricks and Libby Purves are all clues to this. But since he retired and is no longer surrounded by eager young faces going “yes, sir,”, “no, sir”, “three bags full, sir”, these fantasies are harder to sustain, which is why, I suspect, he is now drinking so heavily. It was the drink which led to the outburst of psychotic range that led to his banning from The Good Yarn after assaulting a customer, after all.

    You should read what is reproduced below: I have added nothing and changed nothing, and it was sent from your husband’s Google mail address on Tuesday July 16th at 10.51 pm. The address is bobbyslingshot8@gmail.com and the email is authenticated by the screen shot on a separate sheet of paper. Having read it, I feel sure that you will agree with me that it is the product, like the quotation from your husband’s erstwhile blog about my wife, of a personality in the process of disintegration which is in need of professional help, and soon.

    It is customary, when offering home truths of this kind, to do so “more in sorrow than in anger”, but were I to pretend to do this, then I would be lying. As a person acquainted with mental illness I am sympathetic in principle to anyone who suffers from it; but in Robert’s case my sympathy is tempered by fifteen years of his relentless nastiness towards my family and me; sneering, scoffing, taunting, lies, dirty-mindedness and malice. In recent months I have hit back ruthlessly, with the result that his terrible blog has been withdrawn from the internet, and so he has started pestering me with almost daily emails such as the diseased rubbish below. Your husband may have admirable qualities, but one thing is certain – he is a bully; and like all bullies, he can hand it out but he cannot take it. Hence this pestering, which had better cease forthwith.

    Yours sincerely,

    “James Woodforde”

    ReplyDelete
  3. Dear Robert Part III:

    “Detters what I am about to write is well-intentioned and based on a sound psychological analysis of evidence I have elicited from issues and themes you constantly reiterate.

    I figure you have a big problem with homosexuality and a disturbing obsession with the subject of sodomy. You give out such mixed messages on the subject: one the one hand condoning this vile sin, and on the other hand using alleged practice of sodomy in attempts to destroy a person's reputation. And you publish false allegations that your very own wife has engaged in this unnatural and imoral activity! To the outsider this can be so confusing - but not to me. I know you Detters. And I know that at the basis of this troubled psychology is your relationship with your gay nephew.

    Now Detters I just know that the very notion of sodomy and your gay nephew brings forth in your soul a reaction of abhorence and guilt. "Abhorence, yes, but why guilt?" I hear you ask. Well, let's go back to your postings on the TES Opinion Forum from about fourteen years ago. You posted that your gay nephew as a teenager approached you troubled as to his sexual orientation. You counselled him and no doubt in a laudable and competent way. You have experience as a counsellor after all. But something was left out. Your advice did not contain any spiritual/moral dimension. You know that you should have provided the young man with some catechesis and included in your advice the unequivocal doctrine of the Anglican Communion that 'homosexual acts are incompatible with the Scriptures'. You just know you should have done that and you constantly reproach yourself that you were so remiss. And of course, as many do in similar situations, you try various mechanisms to lay the guilt elsewhere.

    But all is not lost. How about a reconciliation with your gay nephew and a review of the morality of engaging in homosexual acts? The Catechism of the Catholic Curch might be very helpful here:
    2357 Homosexuality refers to relations between men or between women who experience an exclusive or predominant sexual attraction toward persons of the same sex. It has taken a great variety of forms through the centuries and in different cultures. Its psychological genesis remains largely unexplained. Basing itself on Sacred Scripture, which presents homosexual acts as acts of grave depravity,141 tradition has always declared that "homosexual acts are intrinsically disordered."142 They are contrary to the natural law. They close the sexual act to the gift of life. They do not proceed from a genuine affective and sexual complementarity. Under no circumstances can they be approved.
    2358 The number of men and women who have deep-seated homosexual tendencies is not negligible. This inclination, which is objectively disordered, constitutes for most of them a trial. They must be accepted with respect, compassion, and sensitivity. Every sign of unjust discrimination in their regard should be avoided. These persons are called to fulfill God's will in their lives and, if they are Christians, to unite to the sacrifice of the Lord's Cross the difficulties they may encounter from their condition.
    2359 Homosexual persons are called to chastity. By the virtues of self-mastery that teach them inner freedom, at times by the support of disinterested friendship, by prayer and sacramental grace, they can and should gradually and resolutely approach Christian perfection.
    In addition I have composed a short prayer that might be of help:
    Are there gays among you? Let them send for the priests of the Church and let the priests pray over them. Prayer of faith will save the gay persons. If they have commited any gay sins their sins will be forgiven them.
    Glad to be of help Detters.
    GENE

    I will be very interested to see how your respond on your blog to this message.

    DD

    ReplyDelete
  4. Delia, please allow me some time to respond.

    I have a lot to consider here.

    GENE

    ReplyDelete