Tuesday, 30 May 2023

 

Corporate America Has Launched A Religious War. It’s Time To Choose Your Side

BY: JOHN DANIEL DAVIDSON

MAY 26, 2023


In this war there are only two sides: the Tao and the Machine, God or Satan. You have to choose, but choose wisely.


Bud Light enlists a trans ladyface minstrel to sell beer. Target hires a trans Satanist to design LGBT clothes for kids and starts selling “binding” and “tucking” swimwear. North Face launches a marketing campaign featuring a creepy drag performer hocking LGBT gear to children ages 2 to 7. The Los Angeles Dodgers gives an award to a demonic hate group whose sole purpose is to blaspheme and profane the Catholic faith.

All this, and June “pride month” hasn’t even begun.

What’s happening? Why did so many major corporate brands decide to go all-in on promoting an aggressive, radical LGBT agenda that just a few years ago would have been considered totally unacceptable in civil society? Is this a psy-op? Is it real? What happens next?

The short answer to these questions is that we’ve entered a new phase of the culture war, and in some ways have transcended “the culture war” completely. What we’re in now is better described as a religious war — one that’s been launched by corporate America against all of us, and therefore demands we all choose sides.

Choosing sides in a religious war means you have to choose your religion. And in this particular religious war, there are only two sides. On one side is what C.S. Lewis called the Tao, which was his ecumenical shorthand for objective moral truth. “The Tao, which others may call Natural Law or Traditional Morality or the First Principles of Practical Reason or the First Platitudes, is not one among a series of possible systems of value,” Lewis wrote in The Abolition of Man. “It is the sole source of all value judgments. If it is rejected, all value is rejected. If any value is retained, it is retained.”

In America and in the West generally, the side of the Tao is the side of faithful Christians and Jews, as well as those atheists who, for practical reasons, cling to Judeo-Christian morality as the survivors of a shipwreck might cling to a lifeboat. It is the side that sees Target’s transing of kids as an intolerable moral evil, affirms the givenness of our nature and the created order, and recognizes not only that man isn’t God, but that man’s destiny is communion with God in a redeemed creation.

On the other side is what the writer Paul Kingsnorth, among others, has called the Machine, which at its root is a Nietzschean rebellion against God that turns out also to be “a rebellion against everything: roots, culture, community, families, biology itself.” Like the Tao, the religion of the Machine, of progress and technology and will to power, has a very long pedigree. It goes back to the Garden of Eden, where the serpent assured Eve, “You will not surely die,” that if she ate of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, she would become like God.

That was the first rebellion; we have been reenacting it ever since. It is perhaps easier to see in our own time how every rebellion against God, from the Garden to now, is also an attempt to overthrow Him, to become like God. Indeed, the desire to play God is the dark heart of both transgenderism and its close cousin, transhumanism. Like other evils of our age — abortion and euthanasia, to name the obvious ones — these are, at their roots, extremely candid manifestations of pride, the source of all sin.

The Machine is a religion that makes a claim over and against reality and the created order, which are denied and disfigured in man’s attempt to arrogate the power to recreate himself according to his own desires. In our day, he seeks to do so using new technologies, but that he would desire to do so is merely the latest iteration of the rebellion that began in the Garden. This is what J.R.R. Tolkien meant when he said “all stories are ultimately about the fall.” Tolkien also referred to the Machine at times when discussing his legendarium, often describing it as the urge to amass power and dominate, “bulldozing the real world, or coercing other wills” — a tyranny exercised over creation with the object of overcoming mortality. 

This is just what we see in the twin trans movements: a desire to overcome sex and a desire to overcome death. The transhumanists are as explicit about their desire to cheat death and attain godlike immortality as transgenders are about their desire to become the opposite sex. The latter appear to believe, like rebellious pagans of past ages, that children have an important role to play in the achievement of this desire. The Machine devoured children by fire on the altars of Moloch and Baal; it devours them now in the black mirrors of the internet and social media.

The temptation here is to dismiss this reading of our situation as hyperbole. Surely it isn’t as bad as all that, we want to say. But it really is. What’s happening now isn’t about corporate brands embracing “pride month,” as The New York Times recently framed it, or even about promoting tolerance in a diverse society. If Target were just selling T-shirts that said “fabulous” in rainbow letters no one would care. This is about transing kids. Everyone knows it, but no one wants to say so out loud. Corporations are the tip of the spear, pushing this stuff out and then letting the media turn around and accuse the right of being violent bigots for objecting.

We err, too, in thinking of all this as just a really bad case of “the culture war” that breaks along the familiar lines of left and right, blue and red. It’s partly that, but at its deepest level it’s a religious war, a spiritual struggle between light and darkness, good and evil, the Tao and the Machine.

All of which is to say that as this war develops, we should try not to get too caught up in how much Target stocks plummet or how low the price of Bud Light gets ($0, as of this writing). “Go woke, go broke” is — pardon the rhyme — a cope. That’s not to say we shouldn’t boycott these companies, even if it means financial hardship or inconvenience. Boycotting them is part of what we have to do in this religious war, but it’s not sufficient.

Corporate America is not going to stop, even if some corporations do go broke. What will be required of those who resist them is a deep religious commitment, a radical new way of living in the modern, digital age. If you’re a Jew, be deeply serious about your Judaism. If you’re a Christian, make the practice of your faith the central organizing fact of your life, not just something you do on Sundays. If you’re an atheist, pray that God gives you faith.

For adherents of the Tao, fighting this religious war is going to mean not just boycotting corporate brands but reorganizing your personal and professional life. It might mean quitting your job, or moving, or giving up certain things. It will require sacrifice. Perhaps great sacrifice.

And rest assured that every person in America is going to have to pick a side. If you don’t pick a side then your side will by default be that of the Machine, which dominates the heights of our post-Christian culture and economy. Whatever your opinion of transgenderism or identity politics, the Machine will suck you in and ensnare you unless you make a conscious choice to stand against it. So choose, and choose wisely. Your country — and, more importantly, your soul — depends on it.


 

 

GAY EX-ANGLICAN CLERIC TO BE CATHOLIC PRIEST

NEWS: WORLD NEWS

Allen Hall admits former openly homosexual, Church of England minister


WESTMINSTER, England (ChurchMilitant.com) - England's top cardinal is authorizing an openly homosexual former Anglican priest to be trained for the Catholic priesthood in his archdiocese despite Vatican directives cautioning against ordaining homosexuals to the priesthood.  

Image
David Cherry at the Westminster University LGBT event 

Cardinal Vincent Nichols, archbishop of Westminster and president of the Catholic Bishops' Conference of England and Wales (CBCEW) has endorsed the admission of David Cherry for priestly formation at Allen Hall Seminary, London. 

"I started formation in Allen Hall last September, two years after being received into the Catholic Church," Cherry wrote in the 2021 Easter edition of the seminary's newsletter.

Cherry said he "found the courage to take this great leap of faith" through his "involvement in Ignatian spirituality and discernment" and "with the patience and love of friends."

In September 2018, Cherry was received into full communion with the Catholic Church in the Parish of the Most Precious Blood — an Anglican ordinariate parish in the archdiocese of Southwark.

Sources at Allen Hall told Church Militant that Cherry no longer has a homosexual partner.

Cherry's Gay Pride

Seminarians stumbled on Cherry's involvement in gay activism on the internet when they found a flyer advertising "LGBT History Month" at the University of Westminster. 

It is a terrible thing to grow up with a secret that who you are must be kept a secret and must stay hidden.GabTweet

Cherry was billed as a "gay Anglican minister" on a panel discussion titled "How Faith and Sexuality Can go Hand in Hand," along with Stonewall policy advisor Alice Ashworth and other homosexuals from different religious backgrounds.  

Cherry said at the event:

It is a terrible thing not to be known and to have to keep a secret … It is a terrible thing to grow up with a secret that who you are must be kept a secret and must stay hidden; that some vital aspect of yourself must not be spoken of.

Some of you and especially some of us older people would have experienced what that was like, and now times are changing, and I'm sure, they need to change some more.

We become who we are by being seen and by having the freedom to express who we are. And this I take in Christian theological terms to be of the nature of God.  

The ex-Anglican cleric, originally from South Africa, spent over 25 years pastoring five parishes including St. Mary's Bourne Street — one of the most famous churches in the Anglo-Catholic tradition, and St. Barnabas Pimlico near Sloane Square, London. 

Cherry was also lead chaplain to Westminster University and coordinating chaplain to Greenwich University — where he was known by staff and students to be openly gay. 

Cardinal's Defense

Church Militant contacted Cdl. Nichols to ask if Cherry had publicly repented and changed his position on homosexuality both in lifestyle and theology. 

Is Cherry in "full agreement with the Catechism of the Catholic Church on human sexuality and willing to preach it and condemn the sin of homogenital practice publicly, including from the pulpit?" Church Militant queried. 

And during the controversies over the notorious Soho Masses, Cdl. Nichols' statements never once mentioned the necessity of chastity.GabTweet

Cardinal Nichols' officer responded: 

All those accepted for formation for the priesthood in the diocese of Westminster undergo a lengthy and thorough selection process. This process requires, on the part of all applicants, complete transparency, commitment to ongoing conversion of life as well as adherence to the Church's teaching on faith and morals. 

Candidates will have been expected to live the Church's teaching for a period of time. Once admitted to seminary, their capacity to live fruitfully the life that will be demanded of them as Catholic priests is constantly and carefully discerned by various means throughout their spiritual, human, pastoral and intellectual formation. 

Prior to admittance to Holy Orders all candidates make their profession of faith and take the Oath of Fidelity. These are a public witness to the candidates' firm acceptance of and readiness to "hold each and everything definitively proposed by the Church regarding teaching on faith and morals."

Image
Nichols ordains Alexander Balzanella at Westminster Cathedral

Church Militant also wrote to Cherry and to Allen Hall rector Canon John O'Leary but received no response. 

Ex-Gay? Dubious, Says Deacon

Speaking to Church Militant, popular British writer and deacon Nick Donnelly said he doesn't "discount the possibility of personal conversion, but there are reasons to doubt that Westminster archdiocese would insist strongly on candidates to the seminary upholding the Church's teaching on homosexuality." 

Donnelly elaborated: 

For example, Martin Pendergast and Terence Weldon, who are openly homosexual, admit that when they negotiated with Westminster archdiocese to establish the pro-LGBT Soho Masses, Bp. Longley — on behalf of Cdl. Cormac Murphy-O'Connor — at no time expressed any demand that they "remain celibate or agree with Church teaching." 

And during the controversies over the notorious Soho Masses, Cdl. Nichols' statements never once mentioned the necessity of chastity. This calls into question the reassurance of the Westminster archdiocese that all seminary candidates are required, in any meaningful way, to uphold the teachings of the Church on this matter.

In July, Bp. Marcus Stock ordained Christopher William Butler in Leeds Cathedral. Butler earlier bragged on social media about his same-sex civil partnership. 

One must in no way overlook the negative consequences that can derive from the ordination of persons with deep-seated homosexual tendencies.GabTweet

Church Militant reported in January 2020 that Butler and his former homosexual civil partner Alan Sumner had entered into a registered same-sex civil partnership before same-sex "marriage" was legalized in Britain.

Earlier in September 2020, Cdl. Nichols ordained Fr. Alexander Balzanella in Westminster Cathedral despite complaints that the ordinand had supported sodomy on social media — including Pride marches, queer events, gay nightclubs and same-sex "marriage."

Image
Fr. Christopher William Butler (right)

In June, Cdl. Nichols pulled Fr. Philip Dyer-Perry's appointment as pastoral director of Allen Hall after Church Militant exposed the priest's pro-abortion and pro-LGBT positions. 

Church Teaching

In 2005, Pope Benedict XVI approved the Instruction Concerning the Criteria for the Discernment of Vocations with regard to Persons with Homosexual Tendencies in view of their Admission to the Seminary and to Holy Orders. It addresses "whether to admit to the seminary and to Holy Orders candidates who have deep-seated homosexual tendencies."

The directive said it was "necessary to state clearly that the Church, while profoundly respecting the persons in question, cannot admit to the seminary or to Holy Orders those who practice homosexuality, present deep-seated homosexual tendencies or support the so-called gay culture."

"One must in no way overlook the negative consequences that can derive from the ordination of persons with deep-seated homosexual tendencies," it added.

It clarified that "homosexual tendencies that were only the expression of a transitory problem — for example, that of an adolescence not yet su