GOOD TO BE BACK...
Yes folks it's good to be back. I am refreshed after my sojourn in Brighton.
Now over this controversy that has blown up over that photo sent by Detterling: the best thing I can do is post the original unedited email (and responses).
Herewith:
2 of 2
Saw this picture, thought of you.....Inbox
Detterling your email has caused me a lot of distress. How could you send this to anyone - let alone a friend? Last week I had coffee with Tony of the big saloon and Mary W. at Harris and Hoole in the High Street. They both gasped in horror when I showed them your email. You'll be hearing from me. GENE On Sat, Jul 27, 2019 at 6:18 PM James Woodforde <kochel525@gmail.com> wrote:
Oh, come off it, you smarmy, attitudinising ponce - " a lot of distress" my arse [or rather your arse]. Since when did you - the nastiest man I have ever come across - start being so tender-minded? It's a picture of an anal sphincter from a medical textbook - we've all got one, even you. As I said, I saw this pictuire of an arsehole and I thought of you - just a piece of good humoured banter in the spirit of light-hearted to and fro, as you would no doubt call it in your usual greasy self-exculpation when you write filth about other men's wives. And did your friends clutch their pearls as they "gasped in horror" and reach into their reticules for the smelling salts? For fuck's sake, what do you take me for? Who are you - a man who, with malice aforethought, writes filth about buggering other men's wives and then laughs about it - to pretend to finer feelings? And if by "you'll be hearing from me" you are referring to the non-existent list of wind, piss and flatulent nonsense designed to frighten me iinto allowing your blog back on to the internet, forget it. When I designed my scheme for dropping you in the shit I began by asking myself how I would behave if I were a conniving, unscrupoulous blackmailing bastard like you and went on from there. You can't get round it. Remember two things: [a] start pestering me again and the letter to Marianne goes into the post; [b] your blog stays down and you stay in the clear; you bring it back and you are in the shit. Sod off.
' … about buggering other men's wives and then laughs about it' I've had about enough of this. This never happened. Got that? Indeed when I received the original email from you, accompanied by the appalling photograph, my first reaction was to believe that this was apropos your false claim that I had sodomised Delia. Look! What I wrote was clear and concise. I wrote that: I had asked Delia to turn over onto her hands and knees. I then mounted her from behind Doggy-style. I also mentioned that the Doggy position was Delia's favourite. Thus there was never the slightest hint or suggestion of sodomy. I realise now that the motivation for sending me that email does not involve Delia or myself. It is all about you ginger nephew. You email is a tortured cry from a soul consumed by grief, remorse and guilt. Why so? I hear you ask. It's all to do with the counselling you gave your gay nephew when he approached you as a teenager confused as to his sexual orientation. You counselled him, but you neglected to advise him on something extremely important. You did not give him advice on the dangers of taking it up the R. Sewell - the moral, spiritual, medical and psychological dangers. Your guilt overwhelms you. Detters you will be hearing from me. GENE PS All day, all night Marianne Down by the seaside sifting sand
And your madness now extends to discussing with me this issue AS THOUGH IT HAD ACTUALLY HAPPENED - what kind of psychotic do you have to be to do that???? And what kind of psychotic do you have to be to adduce the following as evidence for your argument? I had asked Delia to turn over onto her hands and knees. I then mounted her from behind Doggy-style. I also mentioned that the Doggy position was Delia's favourite. Thus there was never the slightest hint or suggestion of sodomy.So that makes it all right, does it? You didn't claim to have buggered my wife, but to have fucked her from behind, a reasonable and acceptable thing to have done; SO THAT'S ALL RIGHT THEN, IS IT? Jesus CHRIST, you stupid, psychotic oaf. Your narcissism has finally curdled into a dangerous pathology. And as for this diseased nonsense - I realise now that the motivation for sending me that email does not involve Delia or myself. It is all about you ginger nephew. You email is a tortured cry from a soul consumed by grief, remorse and guilt. Why so? I hear you ask. It's all to do with the counselling you gave your gay nephew when he approached you as a teenager confused as to his sexual orientation. You counselled him, but you neglected to advise him on something extremely important. You did not give him advice on the dangers of taking it up the R. Sewell - the moral, spiritual, medical and psychological dangers. Your guilt overwhelms you. - the most charitable conclusion I can draw is that you are pissed out of your head again. You have invented a situation which never took place and drawn conclusions of ridiculous falsity from it. It is insanity with which it is impossible to engage, as well as demonstrating anew your obsession with anal sex [homosexual for a change - does this perhaps signify a subconscious desire on your own part to be buggered?] In point of fact, I have no idea how my nephew and partner express their sexuality physically, for the simple reasons that [a] I am not interested in how anyone expresses their sexuality and [b] it is none of my business - any more than it is yours, you dirty minded, interfering, prurient old sod. Come to think of it, only a repressed shirt-lifter would harp for so long and so often about homosexuals and obsess so much about sodomy. Is it, perhaps, time that you minced out of the closet Gene? . But however any of that may be, all this crap stops - NOW - or Marianne's letter will go in the post special delivery for addressee only first thing on Tuesday morning [with this email exchange added to it]. I am sure she will be as staggered as I am by your saying that your claim to have fucked my wife from behind was perfectly acceptable, whereas claiming to have buggered her wasn't. I have had enough of your demented whining, whingeing and pestering, and if it goes on I will drop you in the shit without further warning. OF COURSE IT NEVER HAPPENED AND OF COURSE I'VE GOT IT, YOU STUPID BUGGER - but it's such a sure-fire way of winding you up though that it saves me the trouble of thinking up fresh ways of taunting you. Indeed when I received the original email from you, accompanied by the appalling photograph, my first reaction was to believe that this was apropos your false claim that I had sodomised Delia. Once again, that was what I meant you to think, you demented dirty minded bastard. And your madness now extends to discussing with me this issue AS THOUGH IT HAD ACTUALLY HAPPENED - what kind of psychotic do you have to be to do that???? And what kind of psychotic do you have to be to adduce the following as evidence for your argument? I had asked Delia to turn over onto her hands and knees. I then mounted her from behind Doggy-style. I also mentioned that the Doggy position was Delia's favourite. Thus there was never the slightest hint or suggestion of sodomy.So that makes it all right, does it? You didn't claim to have buggered my wife, but to have fucked her from behind, a reasonable and acceptable thing to have done; SO THAT'S ALL RIGHT THEN, IS IT? Jesus CHRIST, you stupid, psychotic oaf. Your narcissism has finally curdled into a dangerous pathology. And as for this diseased nonsense - I realise now that the motivation for sending me that email does not involve Delia or myself. It is all about you ginger nephew. You email is a tortured cry from a soul consumed by grief, remorse and guilt. Why so? I hear you ask. It's all to do with the counselling you gave your gay nephew when he approached you as a teenager confused as to his sexual orientation. You counselled him, but you neglected to advise him on something extremely important. You did not give him advice on the dangers of taking it up the R. Sewell - the moral, spiritual, medical and psychological dangers. Your guilt overwhelms you. - the most charitable conclusion I can draw is that you are pissed out of your head again. You have invented a situation which never took place and drawn conclusions of ridiculous falsity from it. It is insanity with which it is impossible to engage, as well as demonstrating anew your obsession with anal sex [homosexual for a change - does this perhaps signify a subconscious desire on your own part to be buggered?] In point of fact, I have no idea how my nephew and partner express their sexuality physically, for the simple reasons that [a] I am not interested in how anyone expresses their sexuality and [b] it is none of my business - any more than it is yours, you dirty minded, interfering, prurient old sod. Come to think of it, only a repressed shirt-lifter would harp for so long and so often about homosexuals and obsess so much about sodomy. Is it, perhaps, time that you minced out of the closet Gene? . But however any of that may be, all this crap stops - NOW - or Marianne's letter will go in the post special delivery for addressee only first thing on Tuesday morning [with this email exchange added to it]. I am sure she will be as staggered as I am by your saying that your claim to have fucked my wife from behind was perfectly acceptable, whereas claiming to have buggered her wasn't. I have had enough of your demented whining, whingeing and pestering, and if it goes on I will drop you in the shit without further warning. Take heed, you smarmy little ponce. And remember: Your blog stays down and you are in the clear. Your blog comes back and you are in the shit. GOT THAT? |
Thanks for posting all this - I have screenshot the whole lot and added it to the collection of material due to be posted later this week. The scope and depth of your stupidity beggars belief, Gene. I now have you on recorded as arguing that whilst buggering another man's wife is filthy and perverted, simply shagging her from behind is fine. I wonder what Fr Schofield will make of that particular casuistry. At least you'e abandoned the Mary Winterbourne stupidity, but regrettably you have done so only in order plumb yet greater depths of oafishness.
ReplyDeleteAnyway, that's that. You have chosen to be exposed to the people whose respect feeds your bloated self-esteem. Too bad.
Okay, much in this email conversation does not reflect well on me. But I did say I would publish this without editing or redacting. You should know me by now: a man of searing honesty.
ReplyDeleteKind regards,
GENE
"Searing honesty" my arse: whenever the possibility arises that you might be identified as the man who publishes filth like the above whilst cowering behind a pseudonym, you shit yourself with fright and run away, pretending to be on holiday, and then reincarnate yourself either as the fictitious "Mary Winterbourne" or "Mr and Mrs Anonymous of Torquay". No, you published the above because, as ever, you didn't think things through. You never do, which is why I am going to enjoy the spectacle of you being humiliated.
ReplyDeleteDetterling I propose a truce. A truce that may lead to a permanent settlement - something akin to the Good Friday Agreement.
ReplyDeleteKind regards,
GENE
I will honour a truce if the following conditions are met to the letter.
ReplyDelete[1] that all references of any kind on this blog to my wife, my son, any members of my family and myself are removed forthwith - this includes all such references made at any time in the last eleven years.
[2] that all references to TES Opinion, my role on TES Opinion and "the clique" on this blog are removed forthwith - this includes all such references made at any time in the last eleven years.
[3] that no references of any kind, overt or covert, to the subjects listed at [1] and [2] above are made on this blog ever again. The term "references" must include written posts or pictures - photographs, cartoons, paintings, drawing - which purport to portray my wife, my son, my family and myself.
Finally, you will post a withdrawal of the accusation that "Myrtle Thornberry" committed suicide after being persecuted by "The Clique", and make an unconditional apology for having both made, and persisted in, that accusation.
For my part I undertake never to post on your blog ever again unless you breach any of the conditions outlined at [1], [2] and [3] above.
Those are my terms for a truce, and they are not negotiable.
"For my part I undertake never to post on your blog ever again..."
ReplyDeleteHurray!
You accept my terms then. Very sensible, as the alternative does not really bear thinking about.
ReplyDeleteI didn't say that I accepted your terms. I am now handing over all negotiations in this matter to Mary Winterbourne. You'll be hearing from her.
ReplyDeleteKind regards,
GENE
Forget it, Gene.
ReplyDeleteThere is no such person as Mary Winterbourne, and I will not respond to any posts purporting to be from her: don't waste your time, and then I won't waste mine.
There will be no negotiations of any kind: those are my terms and they are absolute: my way, or no way.
And if there is no truce, you are still as much in the shit as ever.
Detterling the terms you propose are totally unacceptable. What you are asking is in effect a total capitulation by Gene. Would the Good Friday Agreement ever have taken place had one side submitted proposals so heavily weighted in its favour?
ReplyDeletePlease rethink things and let me have proposals for terms balanced and reasonable.
Kind regards,
Mary Winterbourne
Detters from now on all negotiations in this matter will be handled by Mary W. I will concentrating on updating my blog. It's time some new threads were posted.
ReplyDeleteKind regards,
GENE
Forget it, Gene.
ReplyDeleteThere is no such person as Mary Winterbourne, and I will not respond to any posts purporting to be from her: don't waste your time, and then I won't waste mine.
There will be no negotiations of any kind: those are my terms and they are absolute: my way, or no way.
And if there is no truce then you will regret it for the rest of your life.
Detterling I'm a no-nonsense gal. These negotiations will begin with you withdrawing two allegations:
ReplyDelete1 That Gene sodomised or claimed to have sodomised Delia.
2 That Gene groped young female colleagues.
You will see to it that these allegations are withdrawn forthwith. Negotiations proper can then proceed.
Mary Winterbourne
Detterling I most certainly exist. I spent my working life as a Religious Education teacher. Retired at the age of 60. I never taught in the same school as Gene but knew the Church of England Busy-body R.I.P.
ReplyDeleteAs to the matters in hand, you have no chance of negotiating unless you withdraw those two false allegations. Also, you are in big trouble if you go ahead with your plans to blackmail Gene.
Blackmail is a heinous crime. It is evil and ugly and represents the lowest level to which the soul can sink.
Kind regards,
Mary Winterbourne
Gene, you should look up the word negotiation and see what it actually means - it means two people of equal standing solving a problem between them to their mutual benefit, neither of which criteria apply to us.
ReplyDeleteWe do not enjoy equal standing: thanks to the your nastiness and malice, the perverted filth and the dirty minded nonsense you have published about me and mine over the years, I am in a position to ruin your standing among the Catholic community of Uxbridge and the Westminster Diocese, and I will not hesitate to do so.
You have no such power with regard to me, and hence you are in no position to negotiate, hence the bluster, and this nonsensical business about "Mary Winterbourne" - don't insult my intelligence.
You wish to benefit by continuing your blog, and I am prepared to allow this if you fulfil the conditions below to the letter during a time scale to be mutually agreed - I suggest Midsummer's Day:
[1] that all references of any kind on this blog to my wife, my son, any members of my family and myself are removed forthwith - this includes all such references made at any time in the last eleven years.
[2] that all references to TES Opinion, my role on TES Opinion and "the clique" on this blog are removed forthwith - this includes all such references made at any time in the last eleven years.
[3] that no references of any kind, overt or covert, to the subjects listed at [1] and [2] above are made on this blog ever again. The term "references" must include written posts or pictures - photographs, cartoons, paintings, drawing - which purport to portray my wife, my son, my family and myself.
Finally, you will post a withdrawal of the accusation that "Myrtle Thornberry" committed suicide after being persecuted by "The Clique", and make an unconditional apology for having both made, and persisted in, that accusation.
For my part I undertake never to post on your blog ever again unless you breach any of the conditions outlined at [1], [2] and [3] above.
Those are my terms for a truce, and they are not negotiable.