Friday, 16 May 2025

 

Thursday, 15 May 2025

 


Essential holiday reading this summer

 

Julian of Norwich’s Radical Trust

Yesterday was the feast day of the medieval mystic Julian of Norwich (circa 1342–after 1416). Although she was never formally canonized, Julian’s legacy as the author of Revelations of Divine Love, the earliest book known to have been written by a woman in the English language, is an enduring one. In it, Julian recounts visions she experienced during a near-fatal illness and uses them to meditate on God’s mercy and love. She lived in England during a time marked by political upheaval, repeated outbreaks of plague, and religious conflicts. Though little is known about Julian’s personal life, it is speculated that she survived the plague herself, and we know that she chose to withdraw from the chaos of her world by becoming an anchoress. Her writings remind us that, no matter the tides of history, surrendering in trust to both the goodness and the unknowable immensity of the divine has always been a radical act. While Julian is well-known in certain academic and Anglican circles, her recent feast day is a good reminder of her lasting relevance to all Christians.

While I would, of course, recommend reading Julian’s Revelations of Divine Love itself, I recently enjoyed a fictional portrayal of her in Victoria Mackenzie’s 2023 debut novel For Thy Great Pain Have Mercy On My Little Pain. The novel brings Julian into dialogue with her contemporary Margery Kempe (circa 1373–after 1438). Both women experienced religious visions, and Margery’s Book is often considered the first autobiography written in the English language. But this is where the obvious commonalities end. The two women lived radically different lives, and Mackenzie interweaves their contrasting voices to great effect. The result is a short but powerful insight into medieval female mysticism that avoids filtering their lives through modern feminism. Mackenzie’s light touch refrains from diagnosing or pathologizing these women (as many modern scholars tend to do), taking their religious experience at face value rather than dismissing them.

The sections written from Julian’s perspective are gentle and lyrical. As an anchoress, Julian committed herself to solitary contemplation in a cell adjoining a church. Although we know so little about her (even the name “Julian” may have been taken from the church her cell was attached to), Mackenzie crafts a voice that resonates with the writing in Julian’s Revelations: “I want my mind to be driven deep into God like a nail,” she reflects, capturing an intensely introspective spirituality. The medieval anchoritic life was even more extreme than joining a cloistered convent: “A nun is a bride of Christ and so has a nuptial mass, but becoming an anchorite is a death.” To symbolize this, Julian attends her own requiem Mass, lying on the floor of the church under a black pall. After receiving the last rites, she enters her cell, and the door is bricked up behind her. She is figuratively buried alive. From this moment on, her only connection with the world occurs through small windows; she can receive food, observe Mass, and impart spiritual counsel to those who come to seek it from her.

Julian initially finds it difficult to adjust to the confined space and turns inward: “I spent these early months in a state of nothingness and weeping. . . . Stone walls. Stone walls. Stone walls.” But it is this turning inward that eventually allows her mind to blossom into a comprehension of God’s omnipresence and love in even the smallest of things. Drawing on one of the most famous passages in Julian’s Revelations, in which she comes to understand all of creation as only a “little thing,” the size of a hazelnut, Mackenzie imagines Julian contemplating a literal hazelnut: “as I looked at the hazelnut nestling in my palm, I understood that all things have being through the love of God.” Julian does not seek recognition or an immediate audience to her insights: “I have never found it easy to begin speaking. To disturb the silence.” But in the silence of her cell, she writes down the visions she received before becoming an anchoress and the understanding she has gained during her enclosure. It is this capacity to disappear—into silence, into God, into the unknowing—that defines Julian’s spiritual genius. 

The same could never be said of Margery Kempe who, in her lifetime, staunchly refused to disappear into any form of silence. Even now she is not silent: We know much more about Margery than about Julian, because Margery tells us a lot about herself in her autobiographical Book. She came from a well-to-do merchant family, was a wife, a mother of at least fourteen children, a businesswoman, and enthusiastic traveler, going on pilgrimages as far as Jerusalem. Those familiar with her original writings will recognize her strong personality, which Mackenzie has effectively captured. Margery’s visions are intense; she assists the Virgin Mary during childbirth, attends the crucifixion, and enters a marriage with Christ. Overcome by her experiences, she frequently weeps, roars, and writhes around on the ground. Some townsfolk dismiss her as a drunk, some clerics accuse her of heresy, but some are touched by her displays of passionate piety. Admiration and praise please Margery; she is satisfied—almost smug—when she elicits gasps or tears from her audience and is happy to take the coins offered to her. She takes pleasure in the idea that, as Christ tells her in one vision, “one day those few of my neighbours that are permitted into heaven will see me sitting beside God as the most beloved of all the saints.” The desire to be exceptional, and recognized as such, radiates both from Margery’s original Book and Mackenzie’s interpretation of her.

Mackenzie allows both the stillness of Julian and the tempest of Margery to unfold without authorial comment. When the two finally meet at the end of the novel, a meeting which we know from Margery’s own account did occur in 1413, the encounter feels like a spiritual summit. Though wildly different in temperament, they recognize a shared trust in the divine: “You saw what I see!”

As we mark Julian’s feast day, Mackenzie’s novel offers a fresh way into her luminous and mystical world. Among her most enduring words is that serene, almost defiant affirmation: “All shall be well, and all shall be well, and all manner of thing shall be well.” This is not a naive platitude, but a hard-won spiritual truth. Julian lived through illness, as well as spiritual and social upheaval. And now, as Catholics stand at the beginning of a new papacy, it is worth remembering that the last time we had an Anglophone pope, he spoke the very language of Julian and Margery: Middle English. Then as now, the world felt uncertain, unstable, liable to break and tip over into chaos on many different horizons. The hazelnut in Julian’s palm, in which she sees all of creation upheld by divine love, is not so different from the Church in 2025: miraculously held together by grace.

Wednesday, 14 May 2025

 

Hemingway’s faith, Mary’s apparitions, echoes in Pope Leo

ERNEST HEMINGWAY
facebooktwitter-xemail
Mary Claire Kendall - published on 05/13/25
facebooktwitter-xemail
Hemingway's Catholicism "came mainly from the apparitions of the Virgin Mary." He was gravely wounded just a year after Fatima.

Today’s feast of Our Lady of Fatima calls to mind Ernest Hemingway’s spiritual transformation during World War I as recounted in Hemingway’s Faith.

Ironically, Hemingway was on the same wavelength spiritually as newly elected Pope Leo XIV, Cardinal Robert Francis Prevost of Chicago.That both were Midwesterners transformed in Italy is of no little interest.

On July 8, 1918, Hemingway was gravely wounded in Northern Italy when Austrian mortar shells were lobbed across the Piave River, hitting the forward listening post where he was delivering cigarettes and chocolates — leaving him with 227 pieces of shrapnel lodged in his legs like “little devils driving nails into the raw,” he wrote a month later.

He was a Red Cross ambulance driver who had sought adventure in Italy and wanted to be where the action was. He got more than he bargained for.

As he lay bleeding, he prayed “with almost tribal faith” for the intercession of “Our Lady and various saints,” that he might be saved, he wrote years later.

So he was.

Father Bianchi Guiseppi, who had befriended him in the officers’ mess hall, anointed him with the sacrament of extreme unction and gave him Holy Viaticum after which Hemingway considered himself a Catholic, Charles Scribner III told me as I began this journey 14 years ago to try and understand what made Hemingway tick.

One thing is certain. His heart beat with the heart of Mary.

When Chris Matthews recently challenged me to defend my thesis, he was much taken with Hemingway’s focus on Mary’s apparitions, reading what George Herter, known for Bull Cook and Authentic Historical Recipes and Practices, told the late H.R. Stoneback, foremost scholar of Hemingway’s Catholicism:

“Hemingway was a strong Catholic. His religion came mainly from the apparitions of the Virgin Mary. He told me several times that if there was no Bible, was no manmade Church laws, the apparitions proved beyond any doubt that the Catholic Church was the true church.” 

Don Guiseppi — a double for the priest in A Farewell to Arms — had, no doubt, spoken with Hemingway about the Fatima apparitions that had occurred not a year earlier in nearby Portugal. It had all made a deep impression on the young ambulance driver from the Midwest. So much so that “Hemingway,” Herter wrote in earlier correspondence to Stoneback, “could not understand why the Catholic Church did not publicize (the apparitions) … I have heard him mention all of these (Lourdes, Fatima, etc.) and others at one time or another.”

Pope St. John Paul II certainly had a great reverence for Our Lady of Fatima — on full display when he brought the bullet that nearly killed him on the Feast of Our Lady of Fatima, in 1981, and placed it in her bejeweled crown, exactly one year later on her feast day.

Now with the election of Pope Leo XIV, the apparitions will surely be front and center.

“Mary walks with us,” the new pope said, echoing Hemingway’s feelings, who told Herter, he considered Mary the “listening post” on earth for Jesus and God the Father.

Such a poignant way for Hemingway, injured at that forward listening post, to describe Mary.

Truly, she is walking with us, listening, and poised to help, if asked.

Pope Leo XIV ended his first public address in St. Peter’s Square by showing how to ask as he led the crowd of tens of thousands with a recitation of the Ave Maria. He continued teaching by example with his first visit outside of Rome, on Saturday, May 10, to the Shrine of Our Lady of Good Counsel, founded by a 15th-century Augustinian nun, in the small town of Genazzano, 19 miles southeast of Rome. Later that day he visited another Marian shrine, the Basilica of St. Mary Major, where Pope Francis is buried

As Pope Leo XIII, the new pope’s namesake, wrote in his papal encyclical on the Feast of Mary’s birthday five years before Hemingway was born: “The recourse we have to Mary in prayer follows upon the office she continuously fills by the side of the throne of God as Mediatrix of Divine grace; being by worthiness and by merit most acceptable to Him, and, therefore, surpassing in power all the angels and saints in Heaven.”

From her heavenly post, as Hemingway imagined, and Pope Leo XIV reminds us, she has work to do here on earth as she “walks with us,” and listens.