Thursday 17 October 2024

 

British Man Convicted of Thought Crime After Praying Silently Outside Abortion Centre

International  |  Steven Ertelt  |   Oct 16, 2024   |   7:57PM   |  London, England

The UK’s campaign against free speech and pro-life Christians continues as a British man was convicted of silently praying outside an abortion business.

British Army veteran Adam Smith-Connor has just been found guilty of praying silently. This is the first conviction for a thought crime in the UK.

Adam Smith-Connor stood still and silent on the public street for a few minutes before being approached by “community safety accredited officers”. He had his back to the clinic in order to be mindful of the privacy of staff and attendees of the abortion facility. Video footage shows the council officers asking what he was doing. Smith-Connor informed them that he was “praying for my son, who is deceased”.

Click here to sign up for pro-life news alerts from LifeNews.com

A censorship zone or “buffer zone” has been enforced since 13 October 2022. The zone was implemented by local authorities through a Public Spaces Protection Order (PSPO) which criminalises engaging in “an act” or even “attempted act” of “approval/disapproval, with respect to issues related to abortion services, by any means. This includes but is not limited to graphic, verbal or written means, prayer or counselling” within the area surrounding an abortion facility. The PSPO further prohibits religious acts, including reading scripture or crossing oneself. See the full PSPO terms here.  

Smith-Connor has now been issued a fine on the basis of the PSPO. The Council stated in their email that the fine is based on his statement that he had been “praying for his son, who is deceased”.

ADF UK is supporting Smith-Connor and has engaged a legal team to challenge his fine. 

“Nobody should be criminalised for what they believe – especially not when they express that belief silently, in the privacy of their own minds. Just like in the case of Isabel Vaughan-Spruce last month, Adam could now face prosecution for holding thoughts, and lifting those thoughts to God in prayer, within a censorship zone. The rapid proliferation of orders criminalising volunteers such as Adam and Isabel should be a wake up call to all those who value freedom of expression – even freedom of thought – no matter their views on abortion,” said Jeremiah Igunnubole, Legal Counsel for ADF UK, the legal organisation supporting Adam Smith-Connor.   

Penalties for Prayer 

Upon learning that Smith-Connor was praying for his late son, the council officer responded, “I’m sorry for your loss. But ultimately, I have to go along with the guidelines of the Public Space Protection Order, to say that we are in the belief that therefore you are in breach of clause 4a, which says about prayer, and also acts of disapproval…”. When Smith-Connor interjected, “I’m just standing praying,”, she again responded, “I do understand that. But the PSPO is in place for a reason and we have to follow through on those regulations.” 

Reflecting on the penalty, Smith-Connor said: 

“22 years ago I drove my ex-girlfriend to a facility and paid for her to have an abortion. It was a pivotal moment in my life. The consequences of my actions that day came back to grieve me years later, when I realized I had lost my son Jacob to an abortion I had paid for. Recently, I stood outside a similar facility and prayed to God for my son Jacob, for other babies who have lost their lives to abortion, for their grieving families, and for abortion clinic staff.” 

“I would never have imagined being in a position to risk a criminal record for praying silently. In the past, I assisted with abortions in hospital as part of my army medical training, but now I pray for those who perform abortions because I realise how harmful abortion is to women and families, and that every single human life is valuable – no matter how small. Most of all, I’m moved to pray because of what happened to my son, Jacob,” he continued.  

Isabel Vaughan-Spruce faces trial for prayer 

A video of the arrest of Isabel Vaughan-Spruce after she said she “might” be praying silently in a PSPO went viral last month. The charity volunteer will go before the Birmingham Magistrates’ Court on 2 February after being charged for breaching the local PSPO by silently praying in her mind. 

After saying they believed that Vaughan-Spruce was silently praying, police officers searched, arrested, and charged Vaughan-Spruce with “protesting and engaging in an act that is intimidating to service users”. Since the creation of the PSPO censorship zone, Vaughan-Spruce had only prayed nearby the abortion facility while it was closed. It is therefore hard to see how any “service users” could have been present while she prayed silently.  


 

 

How Princess Diana’s Fascination With the Occult Guided Her Choices in Real Life

In the late ’80s and early ’90s, the late princess relied on psychics, spiritualists, astrologers, energy healers, and more for comfort and guidance as her marriage to Charles unravelled.


By Hadley Hall Meares


It was quite a sight. Inside her Kensington Palace apartmentDiana, Princess of Wales, lay on her coffee table with her shoes off. Energy healer Simone Simmons stood above the princess, hands outstretched, engaged in an impromptu spiritual session. Simmons had just cleansed the apartment of bad energies. She was exhausted, having spent 40 minutes alone, clearing all the negativity from the marital bedroom of Diana and the then Prince Charles.

“Diana, on the other hand, was on a high,” Simmons writes in Diana: The Last Word. “She said that…she could already feel a change in the atmosphere. She wanted to capture more of that mood change and she said she wanted me to do some healing.”

Bottom of Form

It was a typical day for Princess Diana, whose calendar was crowded with appointments with psychics, spiritualists, astrologers, energy healers, palmists, tarot readers, and dowsers. Desperate to solve her problems and seeking comfort and guidance, Diana also indulged in frequent sessions with alternative medical treatments, including colonic irrigation, reflexology, aromatherapy, acupuncture, and hypnotherapy.

“In the late eighties and early nineties she was with every different sort of person,” a former palace official told Sally Bedell Smith, author of Diana in Search of HerselfPortrait of a Troubled Princess. “They marched in and out, and I don’t know how they got there, but once you get into that scene, it’s a cry for help.”

Bodyguard Ken Wharfe agreed. “Diana was in the thrall of all these mad psychics,” he told Tina Brown in The Diana Chronicles.

Princess Diana’s introduction to the mystical world seems to have been facilitated by Prince Andrew and Sarah, Duchess of York. In 1986, the couple referred a despondent Diana, tortured over her failing marriage to Prince Charles and the pressures of royal life, to astrologer Penny Thornton. “I just wanted to see,” she told Thorton, “if there is light at the end of the tunnel.”

Thorton read Diana’s chart, noting that she was a Cancer sun with Libra rising and an Aquarius moon. “During our first meeting, my endeavor was to provide her with the means to turn her situation around from being a passive victim to an active member of the royal family who was equal to her husband,” she recalled. “I suggested she used her suffering to relate to those who also suffered. I think you could say it worked.”

With her best friend the Duchess of York often acting as her guide, Diana would rely on Thorton and a succession of spiritualists, including the grandmotherly psychic Betty Palko, naturopath Roderick Lane, celebrity psychic Sally Morgan, astrologer Debbie Frank, clairvoyant Vasso Kortesis (who would later write about Fergie with the publication of Duchess of York: Uncensored), medium Rita Rogers, and homeopathic dowser healer Jack Temple.

“Temple’s contribution to princessly peace of mind,” Brown writes, “was to take Diana out of the twentieth century and back in time through fossils taped to her body, or make her sit and renew her energy in a stone circle.”

Diana had long been a spiritual seeker, much like her husband Prince Charles. “She was one of the most spiritually attuned people I have known, and she had a profound belief in God and good and evil, not merely as words but as powerful forces that directly affect us all,” Simmons writes.

She also had a strong belief in the afterlife. 

According to Bedell Smith’s Diana: In Search of Herself, the Derbyshire-based Rogers, a psychic of Romani origin, helped Diana believe she had communicated with her alleged former boyfriend Barry Mannakee, her uncle Baron Fermoy, and her grandmother Countess Cynthia Spencer, who she felt looked after her from the spirit world.

Diana also frequently experienced déjà vu and believed that, in a past life, she had been both a nun and an ancient Christian martyr.

Despite the loads of money and time Diana spent on these esoteric endeavors, Bedell Smith notes that she was also often ambivalent about their validity:

Diana said that she would listen to astrological predictions, but added that she didn’t “believe [astrology] totally. It’s a direction and a suggestion rather than it’s definitely going to happen.” But she seemed to have greater faith in astrology than she let on. “She was not ruled by every prophecy,” [Andrew] Morton wrote, but “her belief at times [was] all-consuming.”

Diana also played down her engagement with such things. “She was heavily involved in spirituality. Mediums, psychics, astrologers, etc.,” her butler Paul Burrell recalled. “I watched her, and she would giggle afterward and say, ‘You don’t believe, do you?’ and I would say well I’m not sure.”Her public silence was the opposite of the Duchess of York, who was open about her new age beliefs. Always savvier than her earnest sister-in-law, Diana was, according to Smith, “Wary of telling people about her ghostly encounters, because she was scared of being called ‘a nut.’”She had reasons to be worried. The press caught on to her esoteric interests and openly mocked her. But for Diana, always scared and wary of conventional therapy, this roster of spiritualists occupied a valuable place in her life—that of reassurance and friendship. “When she came to visit, she used to throw her arms around me,” Rogers recalled. “She always used to leave me a present... we had such laughs and such a fantastic relationship.”Simmons concurred. “She was one of the closest friends I have ever had, and we talked about everything and anything in an open, girlie way, without secrets or subterfuge,” she writes. “I found that I was able to unburden myself with Diana, who was also a good listener, and, because of her own problems, had a ready understanding of other

According to Simmons, Diana not only wanted to know her own future but that of those she loved. “She would ask about what the future held for Princes William and Harry, and about Charles’s health, which always caused her great concern,” Simmons says. “And she was always asking if good things were going to happen to Fergie.”

She worried about her eldest son’s destiny, continually asking Sally Morgan if William would indeed become king.

So distrustful of many in her life, Diana often turned to these paid confidants when faced with major life decisions. According to Brown, when Diana was debating whether to collaborate with Morton on 1992’s explosive Diana: Her True Story, she held a two-hour session with astrologer Felix Lyle for guidance. Brown writes:

I said, “Well, there’s scandal here,” Lyle [said]. “Neptune was playing a devious game and also Pluto was playing a very strong role … and so there was complete transformation in a way. She felt if this is what’s happening anyhow, I might as well facilitate it. And we smiled and said, ‘Well, that’s it, then. The book is going ahead.’”

In the last four years of her life, Diana would grow particularly close to the chain-smoking Simone Simmons, who lived above a Hendon supermarket. Simone was so close to Diana that she was there the first time Martin Bashir called Diana asking for an interview. She would later testify in the inquiry into Bashir’s manipulation of Diana that led to her infamous 1995 Panorama interview:

She came in very excited and said “Simone, he is going to do a programme about my charities, isn’t that wonderful?” I thought it was brilliant…. But as time went on nothing transpired and we all know what happened. He lied to her…He was an out and out bastard. He destroyed her psychologically and made her paranoid — saying the royals wanted to bump her off and to distrust her loyal staff and friends.

The spiritualists who worked with Diana all noted how childlike and vulnerable she was, desperately trying to fill an inner void stemming from childhood trauma. Some believed it was written in the stars. “The two biggest problems in her chart were a Mars-Pluto conjunction, which supplied a reason for her self-destructive tendencies and was active at the time of her death,” Thorton said, “and Saturn’s placement at the base of the life-direction axis, which echoed her deep sense of being unloved and unlovable.”

But even some of these healers believed that Diana had become a “psychic junkie,” who was being taken advantage of by false prophets. “Diana was one of the most insecure people I had ever met,” Simmons writes. “That inner pain drove her to seek relief and comfort in some very odd ways, and there was hardly a therapy that, at some time or other, she hadn’t tried. Some were of undoubted benefit. Others were pure quackery. A few were downright harmful.”

With her deep empathy for others’ suffering, Diana asked Simmons for help in learning to heal the people she met. She also occasionally turned the table on Simmons and attempted to heal her healer:

She had a collection of rune stones with symbols inscribed on them which she kept in a small cloth bag. She would sit on the floor, ask me to relax and to think of what was all around me. Then she would pick out the rune stones herself, spread them out on the carpet (which she insisted on doing herself), tell me to close my eyes and concentrate, and then she would do a reading. She was very pleased when her predictions came true, which I have to confess, they always did.

She also started to believe she could recognize sickness in others. “She decided that Nelson Mandela had something wrong with his spleen and his kidneys and told him so during her visit to South Africa in 1997 when he had a swollen elbow,” Simmons writes. “Mandela was very fond of Diana, but goodness knows what he thought of her diagnosis.”

Like so many in her short life, several of these healers would capitalize on having worked with Diana—sitting down for paid tabloid interviews, appearing on TV, and after her death, writing tell-all books. They also were at a loss over their inability to foretell or prevent her death.

Rogers would claim to have prophesied Diana’s doomed romance with Dodi Fayed. “I’d told her she would meet a man of foreign descent with the initial ‘D’ on water—and that the man would be connected with the film industry,” Rogers said. “Not long after, she rang me one day and said, ‘Rita, guess where I am? I’m on a boat with a man I’ve just met called Dodi Fayed.’”

According to Rogers, Diana was so impressed she took Fayed to receive a reading. Rogers claims she told Fayed that he would be in a car accident in a tunnel, but did not see Diana in the vision.

Thorton would also claim to have dreamed of Diana’s untimely death years before. “Diana had often told me that she would never make old bones,” Simmons recalls, “and was certain that she would ‘die young in unnatural circumstances.’”

Whatever the insights or truth gleaned from her years exploring the unknown, there is no doubt Diana had a certain kind of otherworldly gift. Brown writes:

“It was an indefinable quality, something very rare and rather beautiful,” one of her relatives said. “I was not surprised years later when she emerged as a great communicator. Even as a young child she had a strange way of getting through to people.” Diana’s gift as Princess of Wales was that she was able to “channel” ordinary people while actually having less and less real exposure to them.

Since her death in 1997, Princess Diana has become a kind of occult figure herself. Her erstwhile butler Burrell, now a believer, claims to have been visited by her spirit, and she was portrayed as a ghost on the TV show The Crown. In his memoir Spare, Prince Harry recalls going to visit a woman with “spiritual powers,” who told him: “You’re living the life she couldn’t. You’re living the life she wanted for you.”

Even from beyond, it seems Diana’s playful spirit came through. The woman mentioned to Harry an ornament of Queen Elizabeth’s that his son Archie had accidentally broken. “Your mother,” the medium said, “says she had a bit of a giggle about that.”

 

Wednesday 16 October 2024

 I attended Mass this morning. Wonderful First Reading - an excerpt from Saint Paul's Letter to the Galatians...

       If you are led by the Spirit, no law can touch you. 

When self-indulgence is at work the results are obvious: fornication, sodomy and sexual irresponsibility; idolatry and sorcery; feuds and wrangling, jealousy, bad temper and quarrels; disagreements, factions, envy; drunkenness, orgies and similar things. I warn you now, as I warned you before: those who behave like this will not inherit the kingdom of God. What the Spirit brings is very different: love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, trustfulness, gentleness and self-control. There can be no law against things like that, of course. You cannot belong to Christ Jesus unless you crucify all self-indulgent passions and desires.
  
Since the Spirit is our life, let us be directed by the Spirit.

 

Assisted dying bill dangerous, says Archbishop

Media caption,

Watch: Archbishop of Canterbury warns of "slippery slope" on assisted dying

  • Published

The Archbishop of Canterbury has called the idea of assisted dying "dangerous" and suggested it would lead to a “slippery slope” where more people would feel compelled to have their life ended medically.

The head of the Church of England was speaking with the BBC ahead of the first reading in Parliament of a bill that would give terminally ill people in England and Wales the right to end their lives.

Kim Leadbeater, the MP who introduced the bill on Wednesday, told the BBC she disagrees with the archbishop’s “slippery slope” argument, saying their proposal is for people who are terminally ill and suffering at the end of their life.

Polling in recent years has consistently shown 60-75% of the British public supports such a law.

Forms of assisted dying are legal in several countries around the world – and supporters say the UK could benefit from looking at where those systems have operated best.

But Archbishop Justin Welby told the BBC he believed legalising assisted dying “opens the way to it broadening out, such that people who are not in that situation [terminally ill] asking for this, or feeling pressured to ask for it”.

He and 25 other Church of England bishops and archbishops have seats in the House of Lords and can vote on legislation.

“For 30 years as a priest I've sat with people at their bedside. And people have said, ‘I want my mum, I want my daughter, I want my brother to go because this is so horrible,’” he said.

He said that, as a teenager, he had sometimes harboured similar thoughts about his own father in the final years of his life. He also referred to the death of his mother, Jane, 93, last year, saying she had described feeling like a “burden”.

But he said he did not want people to feel guilty for having such thoughts and added he was worried people would feel compelled to ask to die if they felt like a burden - an idea he said was wrong.

He said he had noted a marked degradation in his lifetime of the idea that “everyone, however useful they are, is of equal worth to society”. He said the disabled, ill and elderly were often overlooked, in a way that would have an impact on whether they might access assisted dying.

But Kim Leadbeater, the Labour MP who introduced the assisted dying bill to Parliament, said the bill was only about terminally ill people, not people with disabilities or mental health conditions, and there would be clear criteria set for access, as well as medical and judicial safeguards.

"There has to be a change in the law. I'm very clear about that. But we've got to get the detail right,” she told Victoria Derbyshire on BBC Newsnight on Tuesday.

"The status quo is not fit for purpose and unfortunately I have spent time with lots of families who have been through similar, horrendous, end of life situations and that was one of the reasons I wanted to put this legislation forward."

Members of the public have also expressed support for the government taking action on enacting such laws.

One woman told the BBC her 54-year-old husband had suffered from Huntington's, an incurable degenerative condition, and had tried to take his own life three times because he wanted to go before the condition "robbed him of his dignity".

Jane Vervoorts said her husband Dick, eventually died with a number of police officers and paramedics around his bed. She was subsequently investigated and says she was "made to feel like a murderer", before the police decided it was not a criminal matter.

She said they had talked about Dignitas - the Swiss clinic offering assisted dying for the terminally ill - but could not afford to go and " I would have been in trouble for taking him".

Sarah Wootton, chief executive of campaign group Dignity in Dying, described the bill as a "historic opportunity" and said the ban on assisted dying was "forcing terminally ill people to suffer despite the best care, spend their life savings travelling to Switzerland, or take matters into their own hands at home, with relatives often left traumatised".

Dr Gordon Macdonald, chief executive of Care Not Killing described the latest plan to try to legalise assisted suicide or euthanasia as “dangerous” and “ideological”.

He said: “No doubt, there will be those who claim that legalising assisted suicide or euthanasia is progressive, but it is not...Instead, I strongly urge politicians and the Government to focus on fixing our broken palliative care system."

Assisted dying has been one of the main issues prompting discussion over the presence of religious figures in parliament.

Secular groups in the UK have long called for religion to be removed from the debate and even for senior bishops to lose their right to sit in the House of Lords where they can vote on the matter.

The last time the topic was voted on at General Synod in 2022, only 7% of the Church of England’s national assembly said they supported a change in the law.

That contrasts with the strong majorities in favour of the law reflected in public polling.

“There will be people who look at that and say the Church is totally out of touch, that they totally disagree with us, and say they are going nowhere near a church, but we don't do things on the basis of opinion polls,” the Archbishop of Canterbury told the BBC.

Last week Cardinal Vincent Nichols, head of the Catholic Church in England and Wales, also urged Catholics to write to their MPs to express their opposition to assisted dying.

But it is the Church of England that also has the privilege of being the “established Church” in England, and it is 26 Church of England bishops and archbishops who automatically get seats in the House of Lords.

A second reading of the bill will be heard in Parliament on Friday 29 November.


Tuesday 15 October 2024

 

Fr Hugh Mackenzie shares a couple of angles upon why the Church opposes legalising assisted suicide or euthanasia, inspired by some philosophy and some deathbed ministry at St John’s Hospice. 

Human beings are good beings. This is true even if they do bad actions, but especially if they have bad suffering. To be alive is to have an importance. This basic value is not earnt but received along with life itself. Love of someone affirms that importance. Denying the importance of someone’s life is not true love. 

The basic concepts of good and bad, right and wrong, compassion and trust, emerge from this intrinsic value of the human. Goodness is ultimately about fostering the human person. To set criteria by which the importance of someone staying alive can be evaluated, undermines their basic value and the very basis of morality and civilisation.

You don’t need to believe in God to understand this, but it does complete the picture. In the light of faith, we believe that life is a gift of God and that every human being has an eternal dignity.  The basic value and vocation of human life is not earnt but given, by God.

This all means that St Paul was right, the way we live and die affects everyone else (Rom 14:7). No one is an island. It is wrong to argue as some do that euthanasia is a matter of personal choice.

Legalising euthanasia would profoundly change the relationship between medical professionals and patients in hospitals and care homes. It would also damage trust within families. The sick and elderly often worry that they are a burden on others and could easily feel pressurised into asking for help to end their lives. In countries where euthanasia is legal, resources for hospices and funding for research into better end-of-life treatments have been tragically reduced.

Far from life becoming pointless in the face of terminal illness, such moments can be occasions of amazing grace, as I and many hospital chaplains can attest. Loving when carrying a cross saves the world.

The end of life’s journey can present serious physical and mental challenges, yet pain is always easier to bear when we are at peace. Research shows that persistent requests for assisted suicide are rare when people's spiritual needs are adequately met. Our ‘quality of life’ is not just about physical health and autonomy, but about our spiritual well-being. Human dignity is sustained by the love we receive and the love we give and ultimately, real peace comes from living, and dying, in the love of God.

This is why we should surround the dying not just with the best physical care but with constant prayer, like Our Lady at the foot of the cross. This is the true meaning of ‘assisted dying’.