Wednesday 18 November 2015

The astonishing prayer of Fatima

The astonishing prayer of Fatima



A pilgrim walks on her knees at the Marian shrine of Fatima in central Portugal (CNS photo/Rafael Marchante, Reuters)
Surely the 'O my Jesus' prayer is too deep for three shepherd children to have invented all by themselves?
On Sunday the Bullivant family went to Barnes, to visit the touring relics of Blessed Jacinta and Francisco, the little shepherd seers of Fátima fame. Fátima means a lot to me: I visited in 2005, when still an unbaptised atheist.
So I’ll no doubt be writing more about it as we move through the imminent Year of Mercy and then into the apparitions’ centenary in 2017. (Incidentally, this is a happy coincidence of dates that can scarcely have escaped our Holy Father’s notice.)
One thing that has always struck me about Fátima – amongst a great deal that is nothing if not striking – is the sheer profundity of the most famous prayer that bears its name: O my Jesus, forgive us our sins, and save us from the fires of hell, especially those with most need of thy mercy.
The theological depth of these brief lines alone would likely convince me of their revealed nature, even without the testimony of the sun dancing in the sky.
Consider just the first three words. ‘O my Jesus’ is not a mode of address that comes naturally to us. For how could it? Who dares to speak to the ‘Lord of glory’ (1 Corinthians 2.8) in so familiar, so intimate a fashion? Who would presume to be on first-name terms with the ‘saviour of the universe’ (St Athanasius)?
In the gospels, not a single one of our Lord’s closest followers addresses him directly by name. Most often, they call him Kyrios: ‘sir’ or ‘Lord’. Peter, for example, thinks it suitable for all occasions, from expressing mortal panic (Matthew 14.30), to pledging his enduring love (John 21.17). Even when actually arguing with Jesus – ‘God forbid it, Lord!’ (Matthew 16.22) – he is nevertheless careful to signal his deference with a sufficiently respectful title.
Other such honorifics, used by the disciples and others, play a similar role: rabbi, rabbouni, didaskolos.
Jesus is by name several times, however. Most of these occasions fall into two main types: demons, revealing their supernatural insight to who precisely he is and why he has come (e.g., Mark 1.24); and strangers, humbly begging Jesus to have mercy on them.
Luke has his lepers implore ‘Jesus, Master, have mercy on us!’ (17.13; see also 18.38; Mark 10.47-8). Note that in each of these cases, even though Jesus is indeed named, some other, more formal mode of address is swiftly added.
But there is nothing like that in the Fátima prayer: just ‘O my Jesus’. Peter and the disciples, Mary Magdalene, the desperately hoping for a personal cure, even the demons… not one is so bold as to speak so informally with ‘my Lord and my God’ (John 20.28). So how then can we?
At the end of Luke’s gospel, God himself, scourged and humiliated, hangs dying on two rough planks of word. Perversely, in this degradation he is surrounded by titles and terms of respect. His claims to be the Saviour, indeed ‘the Christ, the chosen one of God’ (23.35), are turned against him in mockery. Above his head, a sign sarcastically proclaims him ‘the king of the Jews’.
It is only now, alone within the entire gospel witness, that the Messiah is addressed by just his first name: ‘Jesus, remember me when you come into your kingdom’ (23.42).
These words, of course, come from the repentant thief. They are spoken out of true humility. He acknowledges his own guilt, and regards himself as justly condemned. He is beyond hope of reprieve. Offered the opportunity to ask the Christ for anything at all, he asks not for rescue or redemption, but merely to be remembered.
And yet the one that miserable thief speaks to, the one whom he believes will soon ‘come into his kingdom’, is likewise a condemned criminal. Jesus is indeed the ‘Christ, the chosen one of God’, he is ‘the king of the Jews’. But he is these things precisely because he can be addressed as a social equal by an abject, and justly condemned, sinner. The two men – one executed, the other murdered – hang side-by-side as social equals.
This is, of course, precisely the point of the incarnation: God himself comes to hang beside us, as a ‘man among men’ (St Irenaeus); the only one who can offer us the mercy we need, beside us as one whom we might actually dare to ask mercy of.
And this is, more or less, the over-riding message of Fátima: that while we – all of us – are in dire need of mercy, we’re on first-name terms with him on whom we have to call. Now that’s a rather deep bit of theology for three illiterate shepherd-children to have come up with all by themselves.
O my, Jesus!

Monday 16 November 2015

Thomas Merton library donated to US prison

Thomas Merton library donated to US prison



Timothy Muise and Shawn Fisher unveil the John Collins and Edward Farley Thomas Merton Resource and Research Centre at a state prison in Shirley (CNS)
The 'resource and research centre' is housed in Our Lady of Guadalupe Chapel at prison in Shirley, Massachusetts
A Thomas Merton library dedicated to Worcester Catholics and willed to a Trappist abbey has now been donated to a prison.
The gift was said to be a reminder of points Pope Francis made during his recent US visit.
Fr Merton, the famed Trappist, was one of the people “outside of the establishment” whom Pope Francis spoke about, Michael Higgins said at the dedication of the John Collins and Edward Farley Thomas Merton Resource and Research Centre at a medium-security state prison in Shirley last month.
Higgins is president of the International Thomas Merton Society and vice president for mission and Catholic identity at Sacred Heart University in Fairfield, Connecticut.
During his visit, Pope Francis pointed to Fr Merton and three other Americans as examples to follow. He used their lives to make several points, among them support for “the global abolition of the death penalty” and the belief that “society can only benefit from the rehabilitation of those convicted of crimes.”
The other Americans the Pope cited were Abraham Lincoln, the Rev Martin Luther King Jr. and Dorothy Day.
Speaking to Congress on September 24, Pope Francis quoted Fr Merton talking about being free by nature, in the image of God, but the prisoner of his own violence and selfishness.
“Merton was above all a man of prayer, a thinker who challenged the certitudes of his time and opened new horizons for souls and for the Church,” the Pope said.

“He shares his own woundedness,” Higgins said of the Trappist priest. “We all ache into holiness. … That’s why people read Merton. … They discover a companion on the way. … He was one of us.”
At the dedication prisoners unveiled a sign over the Merton resource and research centre housed in Our Lady of Guadalupe Chapel at the Shirley prison.
“I am especially honoured to have the centre named partially after me and Edward Farley,” said John Collins, of St Mary Parish in Shrewsbury. “My hope is that this will generate enthusiasm on the part of the prison population” to study Father Merton.
Collins started the Merton Society chapter at the Shirley correctional facility — the only one in a prison. He said he believes this is the second largest collection of Merton materials in the world. The largest is at the Thomas Merton Centre at Bellarmine University in Louisville, Kentucky, not far from the Abbey of Gethsemani where the Trappist lived, he said.
Collins said he donated to the prison library, as did other Merton scholars and followers, but the biggest donation is the collection Edward Farley of Lowell willed to St Joseph Abbey in Spencer, the local Trappist community.
Thomas More Farley, son of the late Edward and Margaret Farley, said he asked the monks about donating his father’s collection — which includes about 1,000 books, videos, tapes and other materials — to the prison chapter. Margaret Farley Lombardi, Thomas’s sister, said the monks, who have an extensive Merton library themselves, agreed.
“Our dad would be so pleased with this dedication today,” she said. Edward Farley died last April.
Lombardi told the prisoners, “We know that Dad’s collection is in the right place. These materials will help each of you to grow in your faith. … You are in our prayers as you learn about Thomas Merton.”
Collins said the story of his work with Edward Farley is recorded in the Merton scholars’ autobiography, We Are Already One.
He said they met in the 1980s as fellow educators. He was a school superintendent and adjunct professor various places; Farley was an assistant superintendent in Tewksbury.
In 1991, they started a Merton Society chapter in Bedford, which they ran for 19 years, and in 2002 he started one at his parish that he ran for 11 years. In August 2013 he started the chapter at the Shirley prison — after prisoners, who saw his Merton columns in The Catholic Free Press, Worcester’s diocesan newspaper, asked him to come speak and to come back again.
At the October 21 dedication, Deacon Arthur Rogers, Catholic chaplain at Shirley, thanked God for the Merton collection and said special people wanted it there.
Prisoners shared things they’ve gained from Fr Merton and the chapter.
Shawn Fisher had volunteer Ruth Marie read Father Merton’s poem, The Five Enemies. It talks about “the robber” and “the respectable citizen” both losing “the original simplicity of man” by love of what dazzles the senses.
“Much like Merton’s monastic life, a prisoner can certainly identify with many of the simplicities of life,” Fisher said. They can identify with Fr Merton’s comparison of sacrificial vessels and wood in the ditch, which both came from the same tree.
“(We) all originated from the same place … our beauty enhanced or diminished by the choices we make,” Fisher said. “Yet, as we shed the extravagances of life we find our way back to our original ‘simplicity.'”

Friday 13 November 2015

Catholic art is in the doldrums and nihilism has filled the void

Catholic art is in the doldrums and nihilism has filled the void



Tracey Emin's 'My Bed' installation at the Tate Britain (PA)

There is nothing Catholic at all in the emblematic works of our time
Last night I was extremely lucky to catch the final performance in the latest run of The Barber of Seville at the English National Opera. This has long been one of my favourite operas, and I had had tickets to see it on the night Pope Francis was elected, but alas, destiny intervened, and I never made it to the opera house that night.
Rossini is one of the most accessible composers, and the libretto of The Barber is of the highest quality, which means that the story and the characters are worthy of the music that is given to them. Jonathan Miller’s production brought out the full comic potential of this wonderful story, helped by a witty translation.
It was also great to see the opera performed in the sort of costumes that Rossini would have recognised, and not tediously updated to some other place or era, in an attempt to make a point about something extraneous to the opera’s concerns. And if all this were not enough, we were treated to the stellar performance of the charismatic baritone Morgan Pearse, in the title role. I do like opera, and this is particularly the sort of opera I like, and so I was royally entertained.
And yet, as I have remarked many a time, in the twenty-five or so years I have been going to the opera at the Coliseum and, to a lesser extent, at Covent Garden, opera in London seems to be attracting declining numbers. At the Barber of Seville I sat in the stalls – incredibly good seats in the second row, which had failed to sell at the usual price and had been knocked down for a mere twenty pounds. Gone, it seems, are the days, when operas sold out, or at least attracted a devoted following. Gone, long gone, are the days when opera was a popular form of entertainment.
I find this rather sad. Opera is in its origins a Catholic art form. First came the Mass, with its magnificent musical settings; then came the Oratorio, the religious drama celebrated in the Oratory or side chapel (St John’s in Valletta has a fine example of what an Oratory should look like.) Finally, the Oratorio lost its religious nature and became a secular drama, exiled to the theatre. But secular as opera is, the link is there to its origins in the sacred drama of the Mass, seen in the way that music expresses meaning in a way that words unaided simply cannot.
Opera, as we have heard many times, is a deeply artificial phenomenon, which is a mere statement of the obvious: it is a work of art, and it employs artifice. Artifice is a way of conveying meaning. It is not to be sniffed at. Great art communicates such meaning that you cease to notice the artifice, so great is the impact of the truth conveyed.
Liturgy too works in a way that is similar to opera. There is artificiality in liturgy. The vestments, the stylised words, these are not naturalistic. But to try and purge the liturgy of these elements would in the end, I am convinced, severely limit its impact and its ability to convey truth as well. There was, after all, nothing naturalistic or indeed ordinary about the Last Supper: it was an occasion on which the words used evoked a world of meaning that will never be easily exhausted. That is why we constantly need to pay attention to the ars liturgica and the ars celebrandi. It is also a good reason why to be a Catholic is not easily reconcilable with being a Philistine!
Rossini was born in 1792 and died in 1868: that era was hardly a golden age for the Catholic Church, it has to be said, which was contested by more or less everyone during that period. And yet the nineteenth century was also a very fertile century for Catholic music and Catholic art, the adjective intended in both the narrow sense, and the wider sense too. We now live in an age where both are in the doldrums, and where nihilism seemingly reigns supreme. There is nothing Catholic at all in the emblematic works of our time, such as Tracey Emin’s bed or Damian Hirst’s pickled shark.
One could ask where it all went wrong. Or one could look for signs of hope. My guess is that the first such signs will be seen – indeed are already visible – in new compositions, new works of art, and a renewed ars celebrandi and ars liturgica.

Saturday 7 November 2015

Can Bad Catholic Music be stopped?

Can Bad Catholic Music be stopped?



'The choice of music at Mass matters as much as the quality of the sermon' (cartoon by Christian Adams)

When Benedict XVI was in his prime choirmasters quietly reintroduced chant and polyphony to Catholic parishes. But it may have been too little too late



“Extraordinary how potent cheap music is,” says a character in a Noël Coward play. And it’s true. Even in church. A morbid Victorian hymn or a Christmas carol can reduce even the most cynical atheist to tears.
But even more potent, I’d argue, is church music that isn’t so much cheap as embarrassingly bad.
I can’t speak for other denominations, but I’m convinced that the distinctive awfulness of the music in many Catholic parishes helps explain why Mass attendance has fallen off a cliff since the 1970s.
I’m lucky. I live in a London parish where the priest can tell the difference between a good hymn and a bad one. The tragedy is that so many priests either can’t or, more likely, don’t want to upset the choir by banning the dispiriting rubbish written “in the spirit of Vatican II”.
The choice of music at Mass matters as much as the quality of the sermon. That’s always been my opinion, anyway, and recent experiences have only served to confirm it.
At the 9.30 Sunday Mass a few weeks ago we sang “Glorious Things of Thee are Spoken”. The tune is by Joseph Haydn. He wrote it as an unofficial Austrian national anthem and was so proud of it that he used it as the basis for the slow movement of his “Emperor” String Quartet. It was the last music he played, falteringly on the piano, before he died. Later the Germans stole it and sang it to the words “Deutschland, Deutschland über alles”. It’s still their national anthem, though funnily enough that particular verse has been dropped.
But I digress. The organist at this Mass was a professional musician who revealed the lovely proportions of this apparently simple hymn, on which Haydn worked extremely hard.
And people sang – not lustily, exactly, but loud enough to be heard. It’s a congregation of many nationalities; I doubt they knew the words (I certainly didn’t); but they recognised the tune and liked it. Hearing it made my day.
Then, a week later, I went to the Saturday evening Mass for the first time. The organ started up, but within seconds it was clear that the performer would be lucky to scrape through his Grade 1 piano exam. If you listened carefully you could hear the feeble strum of guitar chords.
The hymn, if you can call it that, was one of those numbers that puts the congregation in persona Christi by asking them to pretend that they’re Jesus – “I am the bread of life”, “Come follow me”, “I am the way”. I don’t think the parish priest enjoys this sort of thing and, judging by the squirming in the pews, neither did anyone else. Presumably it’s a legacy from a previous era – when I visited the parish back in the Nineties that was the only style of music on offer.
The folk hymn and the near-identical antiphons that kept breaking out at odd moments during the Mass were completely forgettable. But for me they were also potent. They brought back grim memories.
In the 1980s I was the organist of a parish in Reading. The little choir sang a bleak and tuneless vernacular setting of the Mass (it was the only one we had the music for) but the old PP had no objection to rousing Protestant hymns such as “All People That on Earth Do Dwell” and “Now Thank We All our God”.
Then a new man arrived, demolished the baldacchino in the sanctuary and ordered that every hymn must be folky garbage that made the organ sound as if it belonged in a fairground.
I resigned and for years afterwards I successfully avoided Bad Catholic Music (in my mind it’s always capitalised, like the Second Viennese School). My strategy involved not going to Mass at all. I don’t recommend it – but it worked, because the only place you encounter those smug, gloopy songs is a modern Catholic church.
Bad Catholic Music (BCM for short) is uniquely inauthentic. It doesn’t sound like any other sort of music. Whether “inspired” by folk, jazz or chant, BCM has the knack of always sounding more or less the same.
There’s no precedent in the history of church music for such a clumsy cobbling together of musical ideas and styles.
It’s true that Gregorian chant didn’t resemble the music that worshippers heard in their everyday lives outside church. But it had evolved so gradually – we can trace it back to the psalms of anchorite communities in the late Roman Empire – that it had a timeless quality.
The intricate polyphonic Masses of the 16th century were “art music”, requiring expert performers; but they were rooted in Gregorian chant and when the composer wove in a popular tune it didn’t have the effect of secularising the music.
The greatest Anglican hymn book, the 1906 English Hymnal, was eclectic – but the hymns themselves weren’t. Their tunes came from early English, Nonconformist and Lutheran sources, together with gently adapted plainsong melodies (“O come, O come Emmanuel”). More recent hymns included Parry’s “Dear Lord and Father of Mankind” and “For All the Saints” by Vaughan Williams, the English Hymnal’s musical editor.
Admittedly, English Catholics of the same era didn’t have the same riches to choose from. I remember my father telling me that, back in the 1940s, his local parish sang “Soul of my Saviour” every week and “dragged it out for ever”. When I was a child you could still hear those sentimental favourites and I was snooty about them. Hearing them today, however, they sound like Bach’s motets compared to the horrors that replaced them.
When Cardinal Basil Hume died, the choir of Emmanuel College, Cambridge, recorded 20 much-loved old Catholic hymns as a tribute. I bought the CD and it was a revelation. Even the octave leap in “Sweet Sacrament Divine”, traditionally a painful geriatric swoop, makes musical sense if the voices are fresh and someone is beating time.
Yes, the words of all the hymns are sentimental; but the sentiments themselves – adoration of the Blessed Sacrament, identification with the suffering of Calvary, devotion to Our Lady – reflect the ancient, self-effacing piety of medieval worship. They are authentically Catholic.
What a contrast with post-Vatican II Bad Catholic Music. The hymns or “worship songs” that accompany folk Masses reek of spiritual narcissism.
The first person to spot this was the American choirmaster Thomas Day, in his 1990 book Why Catholics Can’t Sing: The Culture of Catholicism and the Triumph of Bad Taste. In many hymns, he says, “the congregation plays the role of God, and a very laid-back God at that”. Day cites a psalm setting by Fr Michael Joncas, “On Eagle’s Wings”. The “moaning and self-caressing quality of the music”, writes Day, “indicates that the real topic of the words is not the comforting Lord but ‘me’ and the comforts of my personal faith”.
Joncas is one of the stars of contemporary Catholic liturgical music in America, along with Marty Haugen, best known for his Mass of Creation. Haugen isn’t actually a Catholic, belonging to the doctrine-lite United Church of Christ, but that doesn’t stop him tapping into the “spirit of Vatican II” as it’s understood by the BCM lobby.
And what a tight-knit lobby it is, on both sides of the Atlantic. To follow its manoeuvres, read a blog called “Pray, Tell”, whose prose is as moaning and self-caressing as Joncas’s music. Indeed, there are 165 posts by Fr Joncas, one of which announces a documentary about “On Eagle’s Wings” featuring a tribute by… Marty Haugen!
Another contributor reports from a meeting of Universa Laus, an international group of BCM liturgists. They sang from the Heritage Mass by Owen Alstott, which – like the music of his wife Bernadette Farrell, a big name in BCM circles – is pleasantly bland. Then it was time for a dose of Marty’s Mass of Creation, with harmonies straight out of a Donny and Marie Christmas Special.
The report, incidentally, was written by Paul Inwood, for my money England’s foremost composer of Bad Catholic Music, whose hymns I once described in The Daily Telegraph as Hildegard of Bingen meets Joan Baez in a 1970s cocktail lounge.
In that article I described how bishops’ liturgical advisers in Britain and the US were “shunting commissions in the direction of ageing trendies”, some of whom made a lot of money out of it.
That was in 2007, when Benedict XVI was in his prime. Anti-BCM choirmasters were reintroducing chant and polyphony to Catholic parishes – but quietly, because there was always the risk of being shopped to the diocesan authorities.
Eight years on, how much progress have they made? In the south-east of England and certain university towns, quite a lot. Young, middle-class practising Catholics take a counter-cultural delight in traditional worship. They’ll travel a long way to avoid what Thomas Day calls the “studied whimsy” of BCM, whose elevator-music harmonies sound quaint to anyone born after 1990. Some of them will join choirs to sing Byrd and Victoria; there are a surprising number on Facebook.
But, in the end, I’m sceptical of conservative musicians’ claims that Catholic music will recover as soon as congregations discover the simple joys of of plainchant, whether in Latin or English.
That’s because, in Britain and most of the West, we’ve lost the habit of communal singing. The only people required to sing together are primary school children, but it’s been decades since they were encouraged to stretch and develop their voices. As a music teacher told me the other day: “Modern adults just can’t reach the high notes that the old hymns demanded. So they don’t even try.”
All of which leaves the producers of Bad Catholic Music free to carry on selling material that few worshippers sing and even fewer actually like. They know that Pope Francis – in private, even more passionate about classical music than the Benedict XVI – does not interfere in matters liturgical.
This year there was a competition to write the music for Misericordes sicut Pater, “Merciful like the Father”, the official litany of the Year of Mercy. Given that the Catholic liturgy has inspired masterpieces from Josquin, Palestrina, Byrd, Monteverdi, Vivaldi, Haydn, Mozart, Beethoven, Schubert, Bruckner, Verdi, Britten and Messiaen, we might have expected something extraordinary. Instead, the winning entry was churchified musical wallpaper.
And the composer? Paul Inwood.


Damian Thompson is associate editor of The Spectator and editorial director of the Catholic Herald
This article first appeared in the Catholic Herald magazine (06/11/15)

Sunday 1 November 2015

YAROOLEGGOYOUBEASTS POSTS ... CAN YOU HELP?



YAROOLEGGOYOUBEAST  POSTS  ...  CAN YOU HELP?




On my thread on here,   Today I shall shed a manly tear at the passing of the Times Educational Supplement Opinion Forum  I am in effect writing a potted history of the TES Opinion Forum. I would be very grateful if any of you out there who may have saved posts from Yarooleggoyoubeast (active 2005 - 2008) could forward them to me at my email address on this blog: bobbyslingshot8@gmail.com.



[I am hoping that Detterling may be a useful source. I know that he has saved a substantial tranche of Gene-related material which he has announced will be forwarded to the editor of The Times on his (Detterling's) demise.]